Witness credibility

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
All you need to do is search "gulags" and there is a ton of information...
Nessie weasel dodges.
Explain and evidence how someone writes about something, is a more accurate way of assessing their truthfulness, than corroboration.
So where did Solzhenitsyn claim to see 2-3,000 cadavers self cremate? Where did he claim that whole bodies were exhumed with a clamshell equipped dragline. Where did he claim to have been subjected to a lethal masturbation machine? Where did he describe an electric Jew dunking tilt-a-whirl? He described real world events about real people, not weird fantasies by some obvious liars.

Solzhenitsyn wrote a CREDIBLE account of what happened to him after he was arrested. How he was interrogated, tried and convicted and sent to the gulag. Your witnesses speak to bizarre fantasies and ridiculous lies.

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31358
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:39 am
Nessie wrote:
All you need to do is search "gulags" and there is a ton of information...
Nessie weasel dodges.
The favourite denier source of information;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag

Some photographic evidence;

https://www.google.com/search?source=un ... 36&bih=722

A witness to the gulags

https://forward.com/culture/134265/forg ... the-gulag/

A general history of the gulags;

https://gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/stalin/

There you go, corroborating evidence that what Solzhenitsyn claimed is true.
Explain and evidence how someone writes about something, is a more accurate way of assessing their truthfulness, than corroboration.
So where did Solzhenitsyn claim to see 2-3,000 cadavers self cremate? Where did he claim that whole bodies were exhumed with a clamshell equipped dragline. Where did he claim to have been subjected to a lethal masturbation machine? Where did he describe an electric Jew dunking tilt-a-whirl? He described real world events about real people, not weird fantasies by some obvious liars.

Solzhenitsyn wrote a CREDIBLE account of what happened to him after he was arrested. How he was interrogated, tried and convicted and sent to the gulag. Your witnesses speak to bizarre fantasies and ridiculous lies.
You claim that you can assess credibility merely from what someone says. Please show your evidence that is an accurate and credible method of establishing witness truthfulness.

Remember, the Nazis did not use hyperbole and emotive language as the Jewish Sonerkommandos did, and they say the same things happened.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
There you go, corroborating evidence that what Solzhenitsyn claimed is true.
From wiki:
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature, who survived eight years of Gulag incarceration, gave the term its international repute with the publication of The Gulag Archipelago in 1973.
Right, Nessie claims that Solzhenitsyn wasn't credible until his work was "corroborated".

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31358
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 12:34 pm
Nessie wrote:
There you go, corroborating evidence that what Solzhenitsyn claimed is true.
From wiki:
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature, who survived eight years of Gulag incarceration, gave the term its international repute with the publication of The Gulag Archipelago in 1973.
Right, Nessie claims that Solzhenitsyn wasn't credible until his work was "corroborated".
We are repeating the debate over Wilkomirski, where you refuse to acknowledge that journalists and historians did have to find corroborating evidence before a claim was accepted. You still ignore that only denial thinks it can determine truthfulness merely from how someone describes something.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Turnagain »

Wilkomirski's book was accepted as gospel truth until it was debunked. Let's see you debunk Solzhenitsyn.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31358
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:08 pm
Wilkomirski's book was accepted as gospel truth...
Which was by people who like you, think they can determine truthfulness merely from what someone states, without looking at the evidence.
until it was debunked.
Debunked by a journalist and historian who looked at the evidence and found it contradicted, rather than corroborated Wilkomirski's claims.
Let's see you debunk Solzhenitsyn.
The evidence corroborates him. From corroborative evidence, I know he told the truth about the gulags. You claim that you can assess credibility merely from what someone says. Please show your evidence that is an accurate and credible method of establishing witness truthfulness.

Remember, the Nazis did not use hyperbole and emotive language as the Jewish Sonerkommandos did, and they say the same things happened.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 9406
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Huntinger »

Nessie wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:48 pm
Remember, the Nazis did not use hyperbole and emotive language as the Jewish Sonerkommandos did, and they say the same things happened.
The NSDAP did not say anything of the sort; its representatives denied the fake claims.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
Remember, the Nazis did not use hyperbole and emotive language as the Jewish Sonerkommandos did, and they say the same things happened.
Uh-huh, the Jew's told fantastic and impossible lies and the German witnesses were coerced. Other witnesses denied the holyhoax but Nessie says that isn't acceptable because they didn't use his list of words spoken in the order of his choosing.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31358
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:57 pm
Nessie wrote:
Remember, the Nazis did not use hyperbole and emotive language as the Jewish Sonerkommandos did, and they say the same things happened.
Uh-huh, the Jew's told fantastic and impossible lies and the German witnesses were coerced. Other witnesses denied the holyhoax but Nessie says that isn't acceptable because they didn't use his list of words spoken in the order of his choosing.
- Both the Jewish and Nazi witnesses are corroborated by documentary and physical evidence.
- There is no evidence of coercion for most Nazi witnesses.
- You are alleging a massive conspiracy involving millions of people all cooperating and either pretending to have worked as gas chambers or pretending to have been gassed and then agreeing to go into hiding somewhere.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Witness credibility

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
Both the Jewish and Nazi witnesses are corroborated by documentary and physical evidence.
There's no physical evidence of steam/gas/vacuum chambers, mass graves, exhumations and cremations on the magic Jew barbeque. Stamp your feet and shriek from now til forever but such evidence doesn't exist.

There's a plethora of documentary evidence that the Germans were responsible for Katyn and even "corroborating" German witnesses.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 25 guests