What Eric wants to do is take the debate to the deniers;EricHunt2020 wrote:Ultimately I need a platform where I allowed to respond otherwise the denier tricks continue.
That has obviously caused deniers to get upset. PrudentRegret is trying to frame the debate in the form deniers prefer;Present evidence that instead they were sent to some other massive camps for useless eaters.
In other words, Eric has to produce all of the evidence and arguments for others to then examine, so avoiding the elephant in the room, which is the lack of evidence to back up denial. As Eric states;PrudentRegret wrote:You are taking the affirmative position, and you are the challenger for that matter, so you should accept the condition of providing the evidence you will be citing in the debate.
No contribution is made by any denier that suggests they are up for a debate. So, the answer to the topic question is no, there will not be an open debate. Debate taken to denial, where deniers have to evidence and prove their claims is not tolerated.There is no proof of any kind that validates your alternate negationist theory invented by deniers years later. It's just denial.