Which is why I’d want a chemist available during any interview with him. It’s rather pointless to discuss something with Germar Rudolf if it doesn’t involve chemistry.
Does that go along with your fake Gestapo credentials?(as is mine, in explosives and being a good Nationalsozialist
Except that if Rudolf is involved then I’m sure he’d want to discuss the chemistry. That is a reasonable expectation for him to have and one where I would expect him to go. I’ve read some of his work but as I am not a chemist I don’t know how to evaluate his conclusions. Only another chemist can properly evaluate what he has to say.), there are many many more aspects to this alleged holocaust that can be discussed so long as there is an agreed common ground, and as long as all parties talk in common English and not jargon. The idea is communication to the people, not to scientists.
That’s completely asinine. You simply dislike the conclusions he and the others come up with.This is where Dr Terry fails, he talks in lingojango which sounds very technical and expert but on analysis says nothing at all.
Basically he full of technobabble.
That aside, no one wants to listen to a discourse on say the mass cremations only to get the "flipperism" of the century by asking "where did they go".
Actually I’ve seen that and what it turns into is a collective circle jerk of “yes I did” “no you didn’t” that is boring as Hell. Frankly anything dealing with denial and it’s endless back and forth now strikes me as pointless. It’s why I mostly don’t bother anymore. The answers are given and then then endlessly shoved back and forth until no one even remembers what the original point was in the first place. All these threads rumble on and on this way. I watched this first hand with Stephen, who created interesting threads that devolved into discussions of Jewish BBQ’s and “where did they go?”
SSF klowns....This is what all the SSF klowns do; adjuncts thrown in at random.
Versus the endless circle jerk I see going on here?
I think Baddiel did what anyone would do and it’s what I did when I first stumbled across denial:I doubt if Baddiel is suitable for impartial interviews considering how he botched this one up.
Figure stuff out on the run.
Was it particularly informative? For someone who’d never dealt with deniers I guess it was. For someone like me who has seen it? Not particularly.