That sums up your hypocrisy whereby you have ignored Bankdraft's strawman fallacies and then linked to you condemning me for supposedly using fallacies.been-there wrote:Yes. That about sums up his approach.Bankdraft wrote:Sounds like you're saying you have no interest in actual debate or learning anything? You're going to keep on posting no matter what evidence is provided?Nessie wrote:I would say my hide is thicker than a rhinos when it comes to participating here and on other Holocaust forums. I am sure [they] are actually rather pissed off that no matter what they say, it does nor deter me from posting...
Just a couple of examples were his methodology have previously been exposed are here and here
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!
Is to be taken within the context of this topic. In which case, he would be correct as I have shown here.You're going to keep on posting no matter what evidence is provided?
Werd wrote:I will take that as a concession.
Anyone who wants to take this issue of the history of manipulated American economics seriously, who wants to peruse the material I provided and the books and authors I mentioned instead of trolling and looking for pathetic excuses/arguments to NOT read the material, all the while going back to beating the same dead horse about the semantics of 'conspiracy theory', can do just that.
1st link. Web archive here.Werd wrote: ↑Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:26 pmSECURITISATION IS 100% ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LEGISLATION
http://www.worldreports.courtofrecord.o ... egislation
2nd link. Web archive here.
Where Story largely based his analysis from:
http://fdnpro.com/reference-material/do ... legal1.pdf
AUTHOR: MICHAEL NWOGUGU, Certified Public Accountant (Maryland, USA);
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 17 guests