I suspect based on my own research that Zionist Jews want global domination, and they can only get it when there are no more white majority countries in the world that can wake up to their scam. Been-there NEEDS TO TELL ME HIMSELF if that is what he also believes. IT IS NOT MY JOB TO FUCKING GUESS!!! Besides, if Zionists get their NWO, how long will it last before Jewish inbreeding starts to happen? Are the conspirators not even considering that, or are they and they have a way around it or a backup plan or something? I don't know. Apparently been-there has all the answers but he just refuses to share them.Werd wrote: ↑Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:19 pmStop dodging:been-there wrote:You mean you really haven't understood yet what benefit pro-Israeli 'Jews' get from influencing as many people as possible in the West to regard all non-Jewish people from Middle-Eastern countries as fanatical, mysogynistic, clit-clipping, throat-cutting, terrorist muslims?
Erm... er, allright.
The ultimate conspiracy of the Jews is to trick gentiles into getting angry over nothing. Funny. I thought the ultimate conspiracy was first to INFILTRATE FEMINISM and preach the lie of tolerance and multi culturalism. THEN, AFTER THAT, open the borders and let the savages into live next to the middle class while the Jews get to leave the country or live in safer communities. Not in been-there's world. The Jews never took the conspiracy THAT far. Despite them fucking admitting it. Been-there still can't explain what it gains Jews to lie about Islam to the gentiles? Why do the Jews do it? What do they want this culture clash for? For us to kill each other off so the Jews can come in and take over all the governments after most of us are gone? What? What is the ultimate conspiracy? Been-there can't say.
From what I have seen so far Been-there thinks Jews are lying about Islam, the Koran, the Hadiths, and also crime rates of Muslims. He seems to think Islam and Muslims are benign and are no more a problem than naturally born Europeans in Europe. Okay, so if Jews are orchestrating Muslim immigration THEN WHERE IS THE PROBLEM? According to been-there, if Muslims aren't causing problems at a disproportionate rate and are well behaved people THEN THERE SHOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM. But according to him, THERE IS A PROBLEM and I am apparently an "unwitting shill for the Jewish organised destruction of Europe." So if there is a problem of some kind, it's not that Muslims are here per say. It must be because they are here AND Jews are lying about their religion and/or their actual crimes committed and the related crime rates. In other words, been-there thinks this is TWO PRONGED conspiracy of the Jews. I see it as a SINGLE PRONGED CONSPIRACY.
When it comes to Muslim crime rates, this is about STATISTICAL PROOF OF PEOPLE FROM A CERTAIN CULTURE COMMITTING MORE CRIMES THAN THEY SHOULD GIVEN THEIR POPULATION PERCENTAGE IN RELATION TO THE HOST POPULATION NUMBERS. The argument about what's in the religious texts or not is ultimately a red herring to distract from the reality that people who SELF IDENTIFY AS MUSLIMS FROM A CERTAIN PART OF THE WORLD STILL CHOP CLITS, COMMIT TOO MUCH INCEST WITH COUSINS AND ALSO BELIEVE IN HOMICIDAL JIHAD, AND RAPING OF WHITE WOMEN.Werd wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2017 11:34 pmMy conspiracy theory makes more sense than his.He thinks the Jews would waste extra time AFTER bringing in a culture that allegedly has nothing harmful and has had no bad results apparently in "integration" in the west, to then subsequently spend so much time and money LYING about how bad Islam is. My conspiracy theory is supported by Occam's razor and is more logical. Jews deliberately PICKED a hostile anti western culture and THRUST it into the neighbourhoods of gentiles. The work would do itself and the gentiles would see the results.
The Jews would not waste their time injecting a culture and then lying about how bad it is. Being historically notorious parasites, they would do as little work as possible to get the job done. Hence, they picked a nasty culture they wouldn't need to waste time and money lying about.
So when we boil it down, I still don't know what been-there means when he says of me that I am an “an unwitting shill for the Jewish organised destruction of Europe” He has refused to explain himself. All he has ever done when I have brought things up like this before is avoid giving a direct answer. You don't know? How can you not see that you're being used? Do I have to use the Socratic method? He evades giving a direct answer just like Nessie. And he justifies it under the pretext that I am not worth dignifying anymore because I allegedly failed is challenge to find the missing word "unwitting" with only one chance.
Nope. My post that I edited twice DOES contain the word "unwitting." We have seen that clearly above.So you failed the test. Even though you edited your post twice.
That is why been-there engaged in a BAIT AND SWITCH. He moved the goal posts to claim that what he really meant was that I was only given one chance.
I took it to mean one post, but apparently he wants me to think he meant "one post with no edits." He intentionally splits hairs (possibly equivocate) on what is meant by one as I already showed here.
So why does been-there want to claim I misunderstood by what he meant when he said "one attempt?" Simple. To DISTRACT FROM THE LIE that I failed to put the word "unwitting" back into my twice edited post that was first created Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:06 am but last edited on Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:35 am. Again, this lie of his that I never put "Unwitting" back into my two times edited post was exposed for the lie it was back here.Werd wrote: ↑Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:54 pmBeen-there wants to split hairs because my 8:06 am post was last edited at 10:35 am. Even though it is one post, the fact that it was edited must therefore mean to him that my "one" chance doesn't count as one post in and of itself with its own unique snapback hyperlink, but that "one" chance only means the first attempt and no edits permitted beyond that. Um, okay. Still doesn't change the fact that I found the missing word and put it back before he made his 1:09 pm post accusing me of still not finding "unwitting" and putting it back.
Been-there is still free anytime to prove his false accusation that I apparently hate all Muslims, with a clear definition of "hate."
Been-there is still free anytime to explain what he means when he says "an unwitting shill for the Jewish organised destruction of Europe"
which is odd considering I have made three topics exposing the Jewish role in immigration and fighting to keep the borders open.