Yes we all know onetruth that whitey is bad and has done some bad things and shed much blood. But guess what? That's INTERNATIONAL BANKING FAMILIES and their puppets in GOVERNMENT. That is political
. That has nothing to do the sociological
issue of why middle class white people should be opening their doors and neighbourhoods to third world filth coming from war torn countries that their corrupted lying leaders attacked without proper consent. Does anyone need reminding that at least one of the wars Bush II launched in America's name was illegal and WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CONGRESS? The idea that bankers
can cause political wars in countries with backwards attitudes to women, and have the refugees come and bring their garbage attitudes to the middle class
in the west is absurd. It's not even an argument!
Islam was bloody before the 20th century. The Moors/Barbars captured and killed many white slaves. They cited the Koran to their liking to justify their nonsense.
Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters by Robert C. Davis
This is a study that digs deeply into this 'other' slavery, the bondage of Europeans by North-African Muslims that flourished during the same centuries as the heyday of the trans-Atlantic trade from sub-Saharan Africa to the Americas. Here are explored the actual extent of Barbary Coast slavery, the dynamic relationship between master and slave, and the effects of this slaving on Italy, one of the slave takers' primary targets and victims.
White Gold by Giles Milton
An interesting read about the Moroccan Jew/Moslem slave trade is the 2005 book edited and compiled by Giles Milton, entitled WHITE GOLD. The Extraordinary Story of Thomas Pellow and Islam’s One million White Slaves. It is the true story of Thomas Pellow a Cornish cabin boy who was forced into Moslem/Jew slavery in Morocco from 1713 to 1736; his memories were published in London in 1739.
White Slaves, African Masters by Paul Baepler
It has been said that the Indian captivity narrative, in which kidnapped or captured colonials reported the hardships of imprisonment at the hands of native people, is the first truly American literary genre. In White Slaves, African Masters, historian Paul Baepler shows that this genre had a precursor in the so-called Barbary captivity narrative, in which some unlucky European (or, later, American) describes life as a slave of the Algerian and Moroccan pashas, rulers of the Barbary Coast. Such narratives form part of Cervantes's Don Quixote and Defoe's Robinson Crusoe; they also make up a large canon of literary, historical, and autobiographical works that are scarcely known today, even among historians. Yet in their time, these writings were widely circulated. Cotton Mather, the famed New England cleric, used several of them to denounce the Muslims of North Africa, proclaiming from the pulpit that being their prisoner was "the most horrible captivity in the world," and Benjamin Franklin drew on Barbary captivity narratives to decry the slave trade of the Southern United States.
Barbarian Cruelty by Francis Brooks
It was during the 1600s that Barbary corsairs-pirates from the Barbary Coast of North Africa were at their most active and terrible. With the full support of the Moorish rulers of North Africa, these Muslim slavers raided southern Europe, the Atlantic European coast, Britain and Ireland almost at will. Most estimates indicate that by 1780, at least 1.2 million Europeans had been seized. Very few ever managed to escape, and most ended their days dying of starvation, disease, or maltreatment. This remarkable book, first published in 1693, contains one of the few genuine eye-witness accounts, written by a white slave who managed to escape. Its graphic description of the lot of white slaves, the Moorish relations with the Jews of North Africa, the conditions of the time and the author's eventual escape, cast a dramatic and nowadays, oft-hidden light upon the time when whites were enslaved.
Sorry liberals but simply reading "Orientalism" by Edward Said won't cut it.
Nobody is saying that just because a culture is backward or not liberal enough that we should kill them all or that we want to kill them all. This is a strawman created by the left. The argument is to KEEP THAT SHIT OUT OF THE WEST. Why wage war? It costs money and enriches the rich and harms the middle class via taxation. Any true right winger or conservative should be AGAINST WAR if they are truly looking out for the interests of the middle class. Isolationism is a good thing. Not intervention. I'm surprised these days to see so many liberals actually balking at whether or not war should be waged. I guess they have to be pro war like Hilary just because she's a leftist and they want to troll all those horrible straight white men that are against war.
They are so against straight white middle class men they will defend Islam even when it cuts up the clits of little girls. That's how batshit crazy a lot of them are now, including the so called progressive feminists.