Re: Who really does have no evidence?
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:30 am
Yes it is.Huntinger wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 9:39 amNessie it is not us denying it.Nessie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:19 amScott shows the problem about the denier argument;
The denier claim is that gassings could not have been done as CLAIMED, not EVER. The issue with that is, as deniers admit, witnesses are unreliable, so witnesses should not be sole source that something could not be done. It is wrong to argue that it could not be done as CLAIMED, therefore it cannot have been done EVER.Scott wrote:A key problem with studying the homicidal gaschambers--which Faurisson was certainly correct in doing and doubting--that is easily overlooked in such discussions, is that it is ONE THING to say that something could not have technically worked EVER, and quite another that this could not have worked AS CLAIMED.
So, other evidence has to be found to establish if what the witnesses said happened did happen or not. Deniers then refuse to do that, because they know the other evidence, documents, photos etc support the gassing claim and nothing else.
Instead deniers resort to the logical fallacies of incredulity and ignorance, whereby they argue because it cannot be done AS CLAIMED, it could not have technically worked EVER. That is a non sequitur.
Not true.The British have admitted that it was a hoax, scaremongering by the Poles and Jude to get greater allied involvement to their cause.
I will only reconsider my position based on evidence. Something you do not have.See the formal propositions above. They said they used this fake information in their propaganda war so please pull the blanket over your face and go to sleep and non sequitur to heaven. They have stated there were no gassing but claim there was genocide so you may be well advised to re think instead of being stuck in your rut. You live in an eternal bog hole which not even the muds of Poland or Russia could create. That is hell and no amount of evidence will get you out of it.