Who really does have no evidence?

Do your trolling, venting, goofing-off, and testing here. "Siberian Exile" is the proverbial "cooler" for over-heated RODOH participants. "Siberian Exile" is an almost uncensored free-speech landfill--and readers be warned: Free-Speech ain't always pretty. Please exercise your free-speech rights wisely and judiciously. You Have Been Warned!

Moderator: Joe Future

User avatar
Trolljegeren
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:20 am
Location: Raufarhöfn
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Trolljegeren » Mon Jan 28, 2019 12:49 pm

lassie post wrote:
Mon Jan 28, 2019 8:34 am
More crap;



Turnagain rightfully claims

1 - "is the fact that NO mass graves exist at Treblinka". There is no evidence to show no mass graves. A Richard Kreige surveyed the site with GPR and tried to claim no sign of ground disturbance, but he has been totally debunked. Photographs, other GPR and various surveys prove buried remains at the site in the area where witnesses say bodies had been buried in mass graves. There are aerial photos which show the outline of some of the graves.

2 - "there were NO exhumations by excavators". There is evidence from various witnesses excavators were used to exhume bodies. We just do not now what type of excavator was used.

3 - "the magic Jew barbeque is a total bust". That is mere opinion and it is countered by numerous witnesses to mass pyres at the camps, complaints about the smell of burning and the large amounts of cremated remains left behind.

4 - "NONE of the witnesses in the USC videos said anything about the odor of burning flesh OR the smell of decomposing bodies". That claim is based only on an edited down presentation of some of the witnesses in a video that concentrates only on transportation and selection.

Turnagain is stuck in a loop of repeatedly making debunked claims and assertions as he tries to reinforce his desired believe.

Sorry Lassie you will need to speak up we cannot hear you. Must be the cold up there.
Image

Ekkert er eftirsjá
Nordisk motstandsbevegelse

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 25013
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Nessie » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:46 am

It is to protect arguments like this;

"As usual, DP gets it arse to front again. The witnesses did NOT say anything about noxious odors and until you can prove that they did, you're just pissing in the wind."

that certain posters on this forum are forbidden to join in the Holocaust section debate.

Not only do deniers refuse to evidence their own claims, they demand others do it for them.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Trolljegeren
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:20 am
Location: Raufarhöfn
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Trolljegeren » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:51 am

Nessie wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:46 am
that certain posters on this forum are forbidden to join in the Holocaust section debate.

Not only do deniers refuse to evidence their own claims, they demand others do it for them.
True you are one and Goody is another. On its final "death bed" as all must face, "it" will demand evidence of its own demise; when it happens, as it heads to Mithlond, all can answer but cannot hear, cannot see. Something will never change. There can be no redemption, it refuses to ask for forgiveness but continues on its own mortal ways in the swamps of the "dead marshes" which are found only in Siberia and of course Middle Earth..
The Dead Marshes was an area of swampland east of the Emyn Muil and bordered on the east by the Dagorlad plain, site of the ancient Battle of Dagorlad during the Last Alliance of Elves and Men.
Image

Ekkert er eftirsjá
Nordisk motstandsbevegelse

User avatar
Trolljegeren
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:20 am
Location: Raufarhöfn
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Trolljegeren » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:53 am

lassie post wrote:
Mon Jan 28, 2019 8:34 am
More crap;



Turnagain rightfully claims

1 - "is the fact that NO mass graves exist at Treblinka". There is no evidence to show no mass graves. A Richard Kreige surveyed the site with GPR and tried to claim no sign of ground disturbance, but he has been totally debunked. Photographs, other GPR and various surveys prove buried remains at the site in the area where witnesses say bodies had been buried in mass graves. There are aerial photos which show the outline of some of the graves.

2 - "there were NO exhumations by excavators". There is evidence from various witnesses excavators were used to exhume bodies. We just do not now what type of excavator was used.

3 - "the magic Jew barbeque is a total bust". That is mere opinion and it is countered by numerous witnesses to mass pyres at the camps, complaints about the smell of burning and the large amounts of cremated remains left behind.

4 - "NONE of the witnesses in the USC videos said anything about the odor of burning flesh OR the smell of decomposing bodies". That claim is based only on an edited down presentation of some of the witnesses in a video that concentrates only on transportation and selection.

Turnagain is stuck in a loop of repeatedly making debunked claims and assertions as he tries to reinforce his desired believe.

Sorry Lassie you will need to speak up we cannot hear you. Must be the cold up there.
Image

Ekkert er eftirsjá
Nordisk motstandsbevegelse

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 25013
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Nessie » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:59 am

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3606#p143143
Of course after a gassing the reports were that the bodies were blue/green/black not white as snow: if cyanide was used as alleged they of course would have a lovely reddish hue which would certainly show up. These bodies are like a "white out" one may experience in snow. As there was quite a time differential between photos lividity conditions would have shown.
The Sonderkommando bodies had been moved from the gas chambers to outside the building. Lividity cannot settle and form when the body is moved as the blood cannot pool. That is one reason why there is no sign of skin discolouration. The other is that the blood flows down, so out of sight as we are mainly seeing the tops of the bodies. The other is that there is pressure on the skin, so the blood cannot pool into the skin. It is the discoloured blood that causes the skin to discolour.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 2658
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Mönchweiler
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Huntinger » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:01 am

Shut up you stupid idiot. Blah blah blah blah... a mad man talking to itself.
Alles hat ein Ende, nur die Wurst hat zwei

User avatar
DabbingIsSoMuchFun
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:19 pm
Location: Controlling the World by virtue of my existence.
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by DabbingIsSoMuchFun » Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:03 pm

I don't know what happened, but that I didn't get banned means that this forum is effectively a Real Open Debate on the Holocaust. It's safe to say that 90% of people here are revisionists and that 10% are counter-revisionists (estimating here). That said, aside from me, I haven't seen anyone active on the counter-revisionist side.


Besides, you could always create a new account.
Holocaust-Leugnung ist keine Geschichte!

User avatar
DabbingIsSoMuchFun
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:19 pm
Location: Controlling the World by virtue of my existence.
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by DabbingIsSoMuchFun » Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:29 pm

Also, holy scheiss, do you guys hate each other! Like, damn, this is something else entirely.
Holocaust-Leugnung ist keine Geschichte!

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 25013
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Nessie » Sun Feb 03, 2019 5:04 am

DabbingIsSoMuchFun wrote:
Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:03 pm
I don't know what happened, but that I didn't get banned means that this forum is effectively a Real Open Debate on the Holocaust. It's safe to say that 90% of people here are revisionists and that 10% are counter-revisionists (estimating here). That said, aside from me, I haven't seen anyone active on the counter-revisionist side.


Besides, you could always create a new account.
Try holding denial to the same standard it holds those who say there was a Holocaust. Demand that the deniers evidence what they believe and show what did happen. Then keep on doing that no matter how often you are trolled.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Trolljegeren
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:20 am
Location: Raufarhöfn
Contact:

Re: Who really does have no evidence?

Post by Trolljegeren » Sun Feb 03, 2019 6:54 pm

lassie post wrote:
Mon Jan 28, 2019 8:34 am
More crap;



Turnagain rightfully claims

1 - "is the fact that NO mass graves exist at Treblinka". There is no evidence to show no mass graves. A Richard Kreige surveyed the site with GPR and tried to claim no sign of ground disturbance, but he has been totally debunked. Photographs, other GPR and various surveys prove buried remains at the site in the area where witnesses say bodies had been buried in mass graves. There are aerial photos which show the outline of some of the graves.

2 - "there were NO exhumations by excavators". There is evidence from various witnesses excavators were used to exhume bodies. We just do not now what type of excavator was used.

3 - "the magic Jew barbeque is a total bust". That is mere opinion and it is countered by numerous witnesses to mass pyres at the camps, complaints about the smell of burning and the large amounts of cremated remains left behind.

4 - "NONE of the witnesses in the USC videos said anything about the odor of burning flesh OR the smell of decomposing bodies". That claim is based only on an edited down presentation of some of the witnesses in a video that concentrates only on transportation and selection.

Turnagain is stuck in a loop of repeatedly making debunked claims and assertions as he tries to reinforce his desired believe.

Sorry Lassie you will need to speak up we cannot hear you. Must be the cold up there.
Image

Ekkert er eftirsjá
Nordisk motstandsbevegelse

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests