In my opinion, this Kiev case, as well as the 1840 Damascus murder of Father Thomaso, and the 1475 case of Simon of Trent are the three best proven cases. If I had to think of a fourth top case, I would pick the Tiszla Eszlar case in Hungary 1882.
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!
- Posts: 6274
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
- Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
𝕴𝖈𝖍 𝖇𝖊𝖗𝖊𝖚𝖊 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙𝖘...𝕾𝖔𝖟𝖎𝖆𝖑 𝖌𝖊𝖍𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖗 𝕹𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖑
38:05 mentions the case of Andreas Youshinsky. It comes up again at 1:13:00.
Jeffk1970 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 11:16 pmhttps://www.chabad.org/library/article ... ctures.htm
Jeff bitches about the fact that no witnesses claims to have seen Beilis dump the body. But he is VERY quick to ignore a surviving child witness (poisoned, but her two friends died that also were poisoned) who said Beilis abducted the boy while the children were playing.The cave in which the mutilated body of thirteen-year-old Andrei Yushchinsky was found. He had been killed by members of a criminal gang led by Vera Cheberiak, who suspected that Andrei had betrayed them to the police.
Absolutely no proof is given of any kind. In fact, she was offered money by Jews to confess. Schramm already explained that Cheberyakov family belonged to the few non-Jews who lived in the vicinity of this miserable property. In fact, HER CHILDREN were witnesses to Mendel abducting the boy and therefore it was HER CHILDREN that were poisoned by a corrupt cop who brought them sweets. The surviving child testified in court Mendel abducted the boy and she ALSO fingered another corrupt cop who were clearly bought by Jews.Vera Cheberiak, the criminal who was responsible for Yushchinsky’s murder, became the main witness against Beilis. State prosecutors and investigators collaborated with her to fabricate false testimony and evidence.
Next.Ludmilla screwed her face up, tears were in her eyes. The presiding judge: "Why are you crying?" -- "I'm scared," replied the girl! The representative of the civil plaintiff: "Who brought you the pies?" -- "Vygranov and Krasovski." -- "Do you know them both?" -- "I know them." -- "Who threatened you?" --
Poleschtschuk."(28) -- "And what did Krasnovski say?" -- "He said that I was supposed to say only two or three words!" -- "Turn around and say whether you don't see Poleschtschuk?" -- "Yes, Poleschtschuk is here!" -- "Point him out to me!" -- The girl walks up to Poleschtschuk, points at him, he
gazes at her threateningly, and she begins to cry. "Why are you crying?" asks the presiding judge, "no one will do anything to harm you here!" The girl cannot calm down and replies: "I'm afraid, I'm scared. . .They threatened, (361) if we would testify, then the same thing would happen to us as with Yustschinsky. . ."
Wild claim. No sources. Well probably none other than Maurice Samuel's book which we have already seen was playing slippery with trial transcripts.Zhenya Cheberiak, Vera’s son, and a playmate of Andrei Yushchinsky. He was likely the last person to see Andrei before he was murdered. He took ill a few months later, and when he attempted to convey what he knew to investigators, his mother treacherously covered his mouth with kisses.
One need only consult the supplement mentioned already to see that this is totally justified.Gregory Zamyslovsky, a member of the imperial Duma and a key player in the conspiracy to frame Mendel Beilis. It was he who falsely accused the Schneersohn tzaddikim, the leaders of the Chabad-Lubavitch stream of Chassidism, of being behind every case of Jewish ritual murder in the Russian empire.
THIS WAS THE CORRUPT COP THAT POISONED THE WITNESSES WHO SAW MENDEL ABDUCT THE BOY! And the Jews are calling him a hero. One need only consult the full English translation of prosecutor Gregory Zamyslovsky's book in order to see how corrupt this man was. You know, the same lawyer, that along with many others, were murdered by the Jewish Bolsheviks when they took over Russia and classified the book for 100 years!Nikolai Krasovsky, the police detective labeled “Russia’s Sherlock Holmes.” After refusing to pin the murder to Beilis, Krasovsky determined that it was Vera Cheberiak who was really responsible for the murder. Krasovsky paid dearly for his honesty: he was removed from his post and himself prosecuted by the government.
Um, no, that was David Maddison and other liars who claimed the boy had 14 wounds when in fact THERE WAS 13. Five of the marks on the head being used to resemble a Hebrew Letter!Ivan Sikorsky, a famous and well-regarded psychiatrist who lectured at the University of Kiev. His reputation soured when his late-blooming anti-semitism caused him to abandon scientific principles, violently skewing his analysis of Yushchinsky’s wounds to support the accusation of Jewish ritual murder.
Refute what claims? That a secret occult Jewish sect that practices black magic and demonology permits the use of blood, which is sacred and central to black magic? Laughable! They can quote the old Testament 1,000 times, and that has no bearing on what is in the more occult texts of Judaism such as the Talmud and Kabbalah. Quality over quantity, folks!
A stack of Jewish religious books entered as evidence by the defense. It fell to Rabbi Yaakov Mazeh of Moscow to refute the bogus claims of the “experts” who propped up the prosecution. Rabbis Mendel Chein, Avraham Chein and Levi Yitzchak Schneersohn assisted him in his research, helping him locate and familiarize himself with a very wide range of relevant sources.
No proof. Possible regurgitation of more lies from Maurice Samuel's book. Funny how this article is loathe to mention Jewish money and attempted bribery by Jews!Interior Minister Nikolai Maklakov was a party to the conspiracy against Beilis. Prior to the trial, he allocated money to bribe witnesses from the tsar’s secret Ten-Million-Ruble Fund.
More unproven claims likely to originate from Maurice Samuel. I'd like to know the circumstances of his 180 degree turn. What money was he offered to turn? Or what threats were made to him? Did this paper report on how the judge had to tell Jewish newspapers to stop reporting perverted renderings of court evidence to the public or they would be banned?Vasily Shulgin, an avowed anti-semite who served as the editor of the right-wing newspaper Kievlianin during the trial. After a meeting with Jewish leaders, the paper’s editors determined that despite their prejudices they could not in good faith support the blood libel. Instead they became vocal advocates on Beilis’s behalf, and decried the travesty of Russian justice.
False for reasons clearly explained in my first post on page one.Justin Pranaitis, a Catholic priest from Tashkent, was the only religious authority the government could find to back the charge of ritual murder. A thoroughly unscrupulous plagiarist who claimed to be an expert Hebraist, the defense unmasked him as a fraudulent ignoramus.
Yep. He's not leaving anything out about the Talmud and the Kabbalah. He's also certainly telling the jury who Eisenmenger was and what his book was Endektus Judenthum, a book that Jews bought and put under lock and key to hide from the general public. The Board of Deputies of British Jews did the same thing to Richard Burton's book which exposed the ritual murder trial in Damscus in 1840.Rabbi Yaakov Mazeh, the government rabbi of Moscow, was renowned for his scholarship and his eloquent Russian oratory. In the last days of the trial, he delivered a resounding defence of Jewish moral values and demonstrated that the chassidic movement had never perverted Jewish tradition or its precepts.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests