Werd wrote: ↑
Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:01 am
Scott wrote: ↑
Wed Nov 27, 2019 4:26 am
It can be argued that Israeli-inspired wars in the Middle East with U.S. and Western backing have directly led to the migrant crisis.
And since many white nationalists or white identity persons also don't like the migrant crisis, this also logically means they CAN'T BE PRO WAR OR PRO INVASION. They can't maintain this "white man's burden" to keep going into brown parts of the world and enslaving and plundering innocent brown countries that did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to them. Offense is not defense.
The interesting thing is that in the U.S. in the current year it is the LEFTISTS who are pro-War and the "White Nationalists" or the Alt-Right are the ones against Interventionism in all of these wars. i.e., Interventionism sounds good to Liberals on college campuses and to gin-up the military-industrial-complex, ostensibly for social justice crusading, but Intervention is not necessarily in American national interests. As such, Nationalists have often been opposed to foreign crusades since the time of George Washington, so this is not really anything new.
The hysteria from this course of events became evident comparing the 2016 Presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, who as Obama's Secretary of State never saw a campaign that she did not want to widen, and Donald Trump, who has openly used the venerable "America First" slogan, and tended to put the brakes on military interventionism (in spite of his pro-Israel rhetoric).
The Anti-Defamation League of B'Nai B'rith regards the phrase "America First"
as anti-Semitism and Hate Speech by definition.
The original America First movement from before World War II echoed the advice of President George Washington in his Farewell Address, which was largely written by Alexander Hamilton, both Nationalists who advised against foreign meddling and Interventionism.
Prior to the Japanese attack on the American Pacific naval fleet at Pearl Harbor, the America First movement, led by aviator Col. Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr. (1902-1974)
who was the son of the renowned Senator Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. (1859-1924
) , were Isolationists who were against American involvement in foreign quarrels like WWI and WWII, it not being in American national interests to do so. After aviator Charles Lindbergh, Jr. successfully flew solo across the Atlantic Ocean in 1927 he was regarded as a popular hero on par with the Apollo astronauts a generation later. President Roosevelt was already sending Lease-Lease aid to the Allied powers, and shooting German ships on sight─acts of war─so it was a matter of time before such machinations would mean that America was officially in the war.
When Col. Charles Lindbergh spoke at rallies and on the radio in the autumn of 1941, he correctly identified the three interest groups that were clamoring for war with Germany or Japan.
These bellicose interest-groups were:
- 1) the Roosevelt Administration itself,
- 2) British Agents (like the so-called "man called Intrepid"), who were conspiring to bring the USA into the war as an Allied participant, and
- 3) "the Jews," a bloc who had a collective axe to grind with Nazi Germany.
Even cartoonist Dr. Seuss (Theodor Seuss Geisel
) got into the pro-war craze shamelessly bashing Col. Lindbergh.
President Roosevelt, knowing that the public were overwhelmingly opposed to entering World War II, intensely feared Col. Lindbergh's popularity with the public until the anti-war effort became moot after the Pearl Harbor attack on December 7th, 1941. After the sneak Japanese attack on the American naval base, it was not possible not to go to war, so the American First Committee
had to be disbanded.
Who is today responsible for these modern Third World migrations and the pathological need to bring such alien immigration into Western countries?
And what is to be done?
We need to be able to aggressively ask such questions, whether this constitutes Hate Speech or not.