Some Jew talking about other Jews owning mass media etc. might be proud or an idiot. Some socialogist researching the origin or impact of Jews owning mass media is doing science. Me writing about Jews owning mass media etc. somewhere is raising an issue. But you talking about Jews owning mass media etc. on an forum soaked in antisemitism denying the Holocaust in a thread legitimizing hate towards Jews and babbling about a "Jewish problem" is antisemitic. It's all about context.Scott wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:05 amIn a famous article published in 1920, Winston Churchill summed up "Zionism vs. Bolshevism" as a "struggle for the soul of the Jewish people." Churchill suggested that they focus on Zionism, and he was not shy of taking Zionist money for his own support.
Likewise, in Mein Kampf (c. 1925) Adolf Hitler explained that Zionism was not really a movement to seek a homeland for the Jewish people because few Jews would ever actually live there. Once a Jewish nation-state was created, it would be an alibi vehicle for the tribal goals of international Jewry.
Today most of the Diaspora lives in the United States, and not that they are monolithic, but they overwhelmingly consider Israeli interests to be American national interests--and certainly not the other way around.
Jews own or manage the corporate mass-media almost exclusively, and they overwhelmingly fund almost all American politicians.
Even to point this out is considered to be anti-Semitism.
The bottom line is that if a small minority such as the Mormons dominated the Deep State to the degree of the Zionists, would any criticism of them automatically be considered Hate speech?
I think not.
That is the essence of the Jewish Problem here, I think.
FYI, you guys destroy with your open antisemitism any of your credibility on the Holoaust. Picture this, fellows who display how they hate the Jews in almost any instance say the Holocaust did not happen. So what? I mean, who else? Who should care?
Now, if I were a genuine Holocaust denier, the first action would be to focus on the actual issue and make those deniers openly hating the Jews shut up. Then trying to recruit (convince) other genuine Holocaust deniers. With a critical mass of genuine Holocaust deniers reached, the whole thing would start rolling, unstoppable.
Interestingly, there are almost no genuine Holocaust deniers. You encounter mostly antisemitic freaks like Fritz, Wannabe Nazis, antisemitic conspiracy theorists. Even the pool of antisemitic talents is so dry that the Holocaust denial publishing seems to die of thirst once Mattogno bites the dusts.
Why is your Holocaust denial not at all appealing to talented people, let aside to genuine Holocaust deniers? Perhaps because it's just that, a heap of crap? There is nothing substantial in any denier argument, as it is not the underlying root. E.g. we have demonstrated - ad nauseum and for the dumbest to understand - that the Diesel issue is irrelevant, yet you get some 2000 search hits here. Because you just don't care. You guys sneer about interrogations from West-German investigations without ever having checked out the files. Because you just don't care. The gas vans docs, all forgery you say, without ever having examined the actual files of the RSHA motor pool. You would experience that the paper feels and looks authentic, the style is authentic, all signatures and handwriting (down to the colors of the pencils) look authentic. Perfectly genuine German docs. But why should you care? There were no Nazi gas vans after all - that's demanding your faith.