rollo the ganger wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:42 am
Been There, since you refuse to actually explain the conclusions of the book by Piper
or any facts supporting his book's conclusions I, and others, can only speculate on your reasons for embracing it.
I have spent a great deal of time answering you and explaining my own understanding based upon my own meagre research of the topic. So its dishonest of you to say I am refusing to explain.
And then most of my posts on this topic have had nothing at all to do with anything I learnt from Piper's book. I haven't even read it yet myself. I've just dipped in using the search option available with a digital PDF version of it. So you are again replying from a position of arrogant ignorance.
Plus I have already provided links to Piper giving lectures and also to his complete book online. So you could read it for yourself, if you are genuinely interested.
Regarding it being censored/banned, did you read what it said at the links you yourself provided?
Michael Piper’s Final Judgment on JFK Assassination now back in stock
Author Michael Collins Piper’s famous work Final Judgment is being reintroduced by American Free Press for the first time in many years.
For those who don’t know, Final Judgment is considered to be one of the definitive books on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Through meticulous research...
America's #1 Banned Book and controversial underground bestseller is back again in its sixth edition. The missing link in the JFK Asssassination Conspiracy, decide for yourself.
So argue with them if you want to be pedantic about the word "banned".
But, c'mon, let's face it, you are NOT genuinely interested in any information that doesn't point to Oswald as the lone assassin, are you? Otherwise, if you WERE genuinely interested in Piper's research and conclusions, you could have read his book and watch his filmed lectures.
Anyway, answer me this: why would anyone capable of independent thought themselves, repeatedly ask someone else “to actually explain the conclusions of the book by Piper”
I have no Judeophobia. That's a calculated smear. Its also a classic Jewish tactic to silence and discredit someone who is exposing facts that Jews and Jewish organisations don't want to get a wider audience. Some have been secretly filmed admitting EXACTLY that is the number one tactic, on the banned Al Jazeera 'LOBBY' documentary. [See here
Q. So why would YOU you buy into that kind of ad hominem
over-simplification. Is this why you stalked Fritz Berg with your ridiculous misrepresentation/misunderstanding of his argument on disinfectant tunnels?
. . . . . .
Anyway, for anyone else reading
If anyone finds and provides evidence of Italian mafia involvement in organised crime no-one accuses them of being anti-Italian.
If anyone finds and provides evidence of masonic involvement in corruption and favouritism no-one accuses them of being anti-masonic.
If anyone finds and provides evidence of paedophilia and the crime of cover-up in worldwide Catholicism no-one accuses them of being anti-Christian or Christianophobic.
But as soon as anyone finds and provides evidence of Jewish involvement in organised corruption everyone accuses them of being anti-semitic.
If anyone finds and provides evidence of Jewish mafia involvement in organised crime everyone accuses them of being anti-semitic.
If anyone finds and provides evidence of Jewish involvement in organised political or societal deceit and corruption everyone accuses them of being anti-semitic.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Is anyone here really not aware yet why, if anyone finds and provides evidence of false details in Jewish WW2 history, everyone accuses them of being anti-semitic?
Does anyone else pretend to genuinely not understand why Prof. Faurisson was so accused and was repeatedly violently attacked, harassed, indicted, fined etc?
Does anyone else pretend to genuinely not understand why Ernst Zündel was so accused and was repeatedly demonised, threatened, attacked, harassed, indicted, arrested, imprisoned, exiled, silenced, etc?
Does anyone else pretend to genuinely believe it was because these courageous pursuers of truth were Judeophobic/anti-semites and so deserved their persecution?