Sorry for the focus on character Werd. I won't do it again and so we can both elevate this discussion to staying on topic.Werd wrote: ↑Thu Oct 25, 2018 9:42 amYou want to focus on character instead of arguments? You have already lost the debate.You believe that explosives brought down the WTC because the laws of physics makes it impossible to believe that it was done by airplanes. And that tells me pretty well what I wanted to know about your character.Wrong.Fwiw, my position, which is in agreement with the laws of physics, is that it happened exactly the way it is said by government to have happened. There were no explosives involved at all.
I'm going to ask you if I can assume that your postion is that explsive charges were placed in the twin towers and that the aicraft hits either had no effect on bringing them down, or, had minimal effect as compared to explosive charges. If that's correct then please state that as your position. Or how it varies from that?
I'll start by having a look at your first link. Or, I'll start with any of the other links, depending on your preference. I think the link that explains your theory most thoroughly would be the best one so please advise.
And for now I'll just say that I'm delighted to be able to debate this topic with you, on a civil level of course, as you have seemed to have asked of me.