You're still not understanding Werd, I'm saying that his 911 conspiracy theory nonsense does damage to his credibility. Very few rational people take 911 theories seriously anymore. And unless you're abandoning your own, it's going to do damage to you too.Werd wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 3:12 pmYou're the one who said that because of been-there's 9-11 beliefs, anything he says is highly questionable. Since he does revisionism is accurate, that means according to you, revisionism is highly questionable. If you disagree revisionism is highly questionable, THEN YOU HAVE JUST DISOWNED YOUR PREVIOUS ARGUMENT.montgomery2 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 3:11 pmso you go off on Rudolf not being credible, which is not logical.Werd wrote: ↑Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:59 pmWhich according to your logic is his holocaust revisionism.
Oh shit. I just refuted holocaust revisionism. I guess Germar Rudolf better pack up his publishing house and stop being a PhD level trained chemist. A few untrained lay revisionists' beliefs in a 9-11 conspiracy wipe out all of the University level training Germar used to write his book THE RUDOLF REPORT to refute the gas chamber hoax.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Are you? Or have you run away now?