Besides some people being batshit crazy conspiracists, there's another very valid reason for this kind of crap to be promoted.
Ad hominem fallacy.
Why is it that the supposed charges were placed exactly in the same places as the aircraft hit the towers?
Wrong. The explosive devices were planted deep within the elevators and within the core of the building itself while on the OUTSIDE and thus the PERIMETER of the floor plan, the OFFICES where people worked were on the outside edge of the square which is why you could look out of the building across New York City through the office windows. Plus if you observe how the plane hit the south tower, you would realize it MISSED THE CORE/COLUMNS/ELEVATORS of the building itself.
You are proving once again you are not paying attention. The 18 minute video from Xendrius explains it all. You are just closing your eyes and insulting people. At least blake has something to contribute and he deserves respect for that.
It's about the money that can be made on books and films, promoting alternative theories from the government's factually true story.
1. Xendrius doesn't charge money for his videos on youtube. Neither do many others. You have no point.
2. What about the people who believe the government's version and promote it in the media? Don't they get a paycheque too? OOPS I GUESS THAT INVALIDATES THEIR CLAIM MUSLIMS DID IT. Your own logic has been turned against you.
Now maybe you should realize that you can't disprove something a priori with little tricks like that and let science be the arbiter. Not whether someone charges or doesn't charge for their youtube videos.
The manipulation of time by extraterrestials, martians, spooks, whatever, is something that needs to be considered much more carefully Werd!
The fact that you're injecting nonsense and I guess, comedy, into the discussion shows you are trying to lead it astray. Which means I have to remind you once again. You are free to pick any of the three 9-11 topics on this board and pick a spot that you think been-there, myself or someone else made an error, point it out and then we can discuss it. You can behave with dignity and honour like blake. Or the opposite. Which is what you have done so far.
What is hilarious about that idiot who likes to play with pennies is that his whole argument about how fast pennies can fall has to do with pennies simply moving by the force of gravity with NOTHING UNDERNEATH THEM TO SLOW IT DOWN. In other words, it completely IGNORES the argument that guys like Richard Gage have made. That there was too much "stuff" below the top, broken and tilted part of the south tower for it to come down nearly in free fall time. In other words "penny-brain" compared apples and oranges when he compared pennies with NOTHING under them, to one section of the south tower with ABSOLUTELY ALMOST EVERYTHING ELSE under them. He just ignores the opposition, restates his argument and uses different, more fancy words to appear to know what he is talking about. Flowery language aside, I'm able to cut through his bullshit and detect his main argument and destroy it.
I'm not questioning his ability to do physics. He has obviously been to college. But even philosophically I can see it is being misapplied. Reason: He says it would only take X amount of time for one floor to collapse, and then something of a second for the next floor to collapse. SAYS WHO? That's what's being debated
and questioned by guys like me due to all the STUFF that was left in the south tower below the part where the snap occurred and the top section fell off the center of gravity. He just takes the quick collapse pancake theory FOR GRANTED and then PLUGS it into his equation. HE BEGS THE QUESTION!