So if the lower 79 floors are strong enough to support a stationary 31 story building, do you think they will be strong enough to support a 31 story building falling at 19 mph?
The answer is emphatically no!
And does the person who talks about static versus dynamic address the molten metal, the pyroclastic flow, the power down and the ease with which to rig the towers with explosives? His whole theory is basically that the top was heavy enough to rip apart everything else that was below the entry point of the plane to the point of even causing molten metal, pyroclastic flow and secondary explosions witnesses picked up. And at near free fall speed. 10.5 seconds. That's pretty close to 8.5 seconds which is what free fall would have been. He even admits it.
the building collapsed at nearly free-fall speed.
But it's not because of what conspiracy theorists point out. It's because the weight is no longer static but operating under gravitational pull and plummeting because of a lack of support underneath which is what exists when the buildings just stand there. In other words, he is saying nothing new.
Nothing in that 16 minute video that I posted from Xendrius is addressed in this link
. He can play around with math and pennies all he wants, but he still hasn't explained all the other oddities including the molten metal, the pyroclastic flow, the power down and the ease with which to rig the towers with explosives all shown in that 16 minute video from Xendrius.