A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

The RODOH Lounge is a place for general discussion, preferably non-Holocaust. The Lounge is only lightly moderated but please keep this a friendly place to chat with and get to know your fellow board participants.
Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:38 am

http://www.unz.com/article/jews-and-imm ... or-change/

Jews and Immigration: Time for Change
Marcus Alethia • March 26, 2017 • 1,400 Words • 73 Comments • Reply


Our country and its Jewish intelligentsia are currently torn by a debate about immigration. On one side the Trump administration is trying to pass executive orders limiting immigration from particular, though certainly not all, Muslim-majority countries while also deporting people — largely from Mexico or Central America — who are in the US illegally.

On the other side are activist judges shutting down these executive orders and what seems like the entire constellation of journalists, pundits and activists in the country decrying these moves. From looking at the writers of many op-ed pieces or from looking through Jewish publications such as Forward, it is clear that Jews are disproportionately lobbying in favor of immigration and against deportation or immigration restrictions. Jewish organizations ostensibly formed to lobby for Jewish interests are on the side of resettling more Muslim refugees. Some voices on this side go so far as to call for “open borders” as in a recent piece in Salon. Most of the left has long decried the idea of White interests or White rights as being inherently racist in a way that Black rights or Latino interests aren’t. See for instance David Aaronovitch’s recent op-ed “Defending ‘white interests’ can never be right” in the Financial Times.

I think Jews are on the wrong side of this debate, and have been for decades. Countries are not arbitrary designations on a map; and borders are not imaginary lines. Countries are defined by their people, and borders generally demarcate necessary walls between peoples. Good fences make good neighbors, as the saying goes. Globalization and mass immigration result in what amounts to demographic invasion. It is natural for host populations to resist this being forced upon them.

The Jewish support for so-called “immigrant rights” is supposed to be rooted in the Jewish experience of diaspora and constant movement. Being exiled from our home in ancient times, we should feel sympathy with others who need to leave their homes in modern times. Jews have prospered in America because it is a multicultural society with such a rainbow of peoples that no true majority exists, or will soon, if current demographic trends continue.

I think Jews should be looking at this in another way.

My ancestors hid from the Nazis and their Eastern European allies as small children. Shuttled from place to place, sometimes shielded by kind-hearted Christians, our family ultimately survived both Nazi and later Soviet occupation. But communism was not to their liking and they fled, not to the US, but to Palestine, which they then helped make into Israel.

The great story of Jewish diaspora does not end in a borderless world, it ends in Zionism, and Israel. Despite the countless mistakes the Zionists have made and continue to make, the basic reasonableness of their position remains: a people need a homeland. Israel is very far from perfect but at least it is a home that provides a haven for a people. Our great mistake is thinking this situation is unique to Jews — a point the Palestinians vainly try to remind us of.

In Michel Houellebecq’s novel Submission, France elects an Islamic-Left coalition government which supervises a national transition to Islam. The Jews of France, realizing they aren’t safe, leave. Not for the US, but for Israel. As the narrator says goodbye to his Jewish girlfriend, she asks him if he will stay. “There is no Israel for me,” he says.

People deserve their own homelands. When Rep. Steve King sent his famous tweet about “other people’s babies,” that is what he meant. Throughout its history, the US was primarily composed of White Europeans. The average demographic balance in the country was a little less than 90% White. The country’s demographic composition changed as a result of the Jewish-backed 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act. When the act was passed, its backers promised that there would be no overall change in demographic composition. But not only was that untrue, but now large swaths of the left and open-borders advocates argue that to care about this change much less take any action whatsoever try to stop or reverse it is racist.

Imagine if Israel admitted enormous numbers of non-Jewish immigrants, say Muslim Kurds, and made them citizens. I greatly admire the Kurds, and I’m sure Israeli society wouldn’t suffer from a few new Kurdish citizens. But imagine that their numbers were so many that Kurds, along with Palestinian Arabs, were projected to outnumber the Jews in 50 years. The Jews would once again be a minority. Jewish leftist, liberals, and even neocons pretend that this is different. How exactly so?

What is the moral imperative for European Whites to become the minority in their homelands? Africa’s population is projected to triple in the next century. How many African migrants must Europe take in? How many refugees from Muslim countries? Must Houellebecq’s vision become a reality?

Japan’s population is over 99% ethnic Japanese. This is in fact the norm in much of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Why should Japan’s ethnic homogeneity be unthreatened but France’s population altered completely? One can argue this is rooted in colonialism, but Japan also participated in an aggressive imperialism throughout East and Southeast Asia, and yet Japanese immigration laws remain strict, largely without leftist or Jewish complaint.

Jewish organizations and activists use the Holocaust as a reminder of the immorality of not taking in people under specific threat. In these specifics they are right — I think it was morally wrong to turn the St. Louis back and not arrange for later temporary safe haven for the 20,000 Jewish child refugees. Similarly, few people think that genuine war refugees fleeing for their lives from ISIS should just be treated with a shrug and left to die. But the lesson drawn is also wrong. After World War II, the Jews of Europe poured mainly into Israel. For Jews, the lesson of the Holocaust was that Jews needed a homeland, not that any particular country should take them in. Now having a homeland, Jews have no business denying other nations their own, and a people’s desire to control their demographic destiny is their fundamental and moral right. There are other ways of helping war refugees without making them a permanent presence in your nation, such as peacefully settling them in their own culture regions.

The US is not in fact a propositional nation and Jewish-American poet Emma Lazarus’ poem was not actually about immigration. As American Jews, we are essentially guests in the US, a historically White Christian nation where a Jewish minority has thrived, but has in many ways acted against the interest of our hosts. As Kevin MacDonald points out in his trilogy on Jews and Jewish ethnic activism, partially because of our fear of persecution and being noticed as an ethnic minority outgroup, Jews have promoted mass immigration and multiculturalism to devastating effect. We cannot atone for the immense historical mistake influential Jewish thinkers and activists made in doing this. But ordinary Jews can help do our part to undo these errors by at least supporting the rights of the majority to control their homeland and demographic destiny. This can be done peacefully, by removing those here illegally, helping resettle refugees back in their home countries, and making immigration laws more restrictive. In the US, reasonable organizations like VDARE have pointed towards this for decades. In Europe the situation is in many ways more desperate and here too Jews should understand and support the movements to project strong European majorities in all countries.

It is not racist for European people to want to be majorities in their own countries, any more than it is for Asians, Africans, Arabs, or Jews. It is not Hungarian supremacy that makes Hungary close its borders and try to maintain its cultural uniqueness. It is not Jewish supremacy that makes Israelis think a Jewish majority in Israel in the midst of an overwhelmingly Arab Middle East is necessary and reasonable. And it is not white supremacy that makes white Americans wish to preserve a basic, white majority, which implies no ill-treatment or legal second-class status for Americans of color.

All Jews know open borders would be a disaster for Israel. It is equally a disaster for everybody else.
(Reprinted from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:41 am

It seems the article has vanished. Big surprise. This is an old one I have saved. I have more coming.


http://newobserveronline.com/u-s-jews-d ... ot-israel/

U.S. Jews Demand Refugees—But Not in Israel
January 2, 2017 by TNO Staff— in North America

The U.S.-based Hebrew Immigration Aid Society (HIAS) has demanded that the “United States remains a place where families fleeing war and persecution can find safety and dignity”—in an article published in Israel, the Jewish state which has refused to take refugees, outlaws marriage between Jews and non-Jews, and has a Jews-only immigration policy.

Image
More than 200 attendees pose for a group photo at HIAS’s #JewsforRefugees Assembly in New York, Sept 14, 2016.

Writing in a “communicated content” article in the Jerusalem–based Times of Israel, HIAS president Mark Hetfield said that “America has always been at its greatest when we have welcomed refugees to our shores.”

The article, titled “Join the Jewish movement to support refugees,” urges Jews to join up with HIAS to bring even more “refugees” into America than is currently the case.

Image

“Driven by our people’s shared experience of persecution and flight, and guided by over 135 years helping refugees find safety and freedom, HIAS and the American Jewish community are working together to protect and welcome refugees and asylum seekers,” Hetfield wrote.

“Communities across the United States, and Jewish communities in particular, are going to great lengths to help the newest Americans,” the HIAS president continued.

“Through our network of thousands of rabbis and hundreds of synagogues, we’ve seen these efforts firsthand. During the week of Thanksgiving, advocates in communities including San Diego, Philadelphia, and New York, helped refugees celebrate the holiday for the first time.

“And over the past year, local congregations around the country have volunteered to furnish apartments for newly arrived refugees, organized monthly potluck dinners, and offered language and job training.

“The Jewish community is dedicated to these initiatives because we know all too well the danger of allowing short-sighted and xenophobic rhetoric shape attitudes toward minorities and newcomers. America has always been at its greatest when we have welcomed refugees to our shores and at its weakest when we have shut our doors out of fear. American Jews and HIAS know this better than anyone.

“Moving forward, HIAS will continue to work with our partners in the refugee advocate community, our network of local agencies, all levels of government, and most significantly, the many thousands of refugees we help every year, to defend America’s tradition of welcoming and protecting refugees.”

The article ends with an appeal to its readers to join HIAS and “keep trying to fight darkness with light, and fear with welcome.”

In Israel, however, there is no such “welcome” as what HIAS wants for America. In fact, the Israeli government has refused to accept any “refugees” at all from Syria, Africa, or anywhere else—and is building a new wall to keep them out.

An official statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said that “Israel is a small country, a very small country, that lacks demographic and geographic depth. Therefore, we must control our borders, against both illegal migrants and terrorism.”

Image

Israel’s official view on barring Syrian “refugees” was also detailed in the LA Times of September 6, 2015 (“One country that won’t be taking Syrian refugees: Israel”), where Netanyahu repeated his assertion that Israel’s “lack of demographic and geographic depth” required controlling its borders against both “illegal migrants and terrorism.”

Image

In fact, Israel has also made it illegal for any non-Jew, as racially defined by that state, to immigrate to Israel at all, no matter where they come from.

Image

At the same time, the Israeli government has also financed, through its official foreign aid section (IsraAID), the Third World Muslim invasion of Europe.

HIAS’s chutzpah seems, therefore, to be in line with the already well-established practice of one law for Israel, and another law for all gentile nations.

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:42 am

http://newobserveronline.com/jews-push- ... s-on-us-2/

Jews Push Muslim “Refugees” on US
February 9, 2016

America’s only officially state-funded Jewish “refugee” organization, the Hebrew Immigration Aid Society (HIAS), works full time to bring as many nonwhite—and mainly Muslim—invaders as possible into the US—but at the same time supports Israel which refuses to grant access to any of these “refugees.”

Image

According to a Times of Israel interview with HIAS vice president, Rabbi Jennie Rosenn, HIAS, which was originally started to promote Jewish immigration into America, now works on bringing Third World “refugees” into the US.

To add insult to injury, this private Jewish organization is funded by federal grants from the US Department of State and the US Department of Health and Human Services, the UNHCR and private contributions, the Times of Israel added.

HIAS, the Times of Israel continues, “offers refugees a variety of free services, including legal assistance for gaining their rights and becoming identified for resettlement,” and Rosenn is the “rabbi who rallies American Jews for the global refugee cause.”

However, this rallying American Jews “for the global refugee cause” does not extend as far as allowing them to settle in Israel, but only in Europe and America.

The Times of Israel—which, as its name implies, is an Israeli-based newspaper, says that it has “been Rosenn’s task to engage American Jews with HIAS and the refugee issue, primarily in the area of advocacy aimed at significantly increasing the number of refugees allowed into the US.”

Part of this “HIAS advocacy” includes, Rosenn said, asking the Obama administration for an “additional 100,000 refugees per year.”

The Times of Israel continued: “According to a strategy devised by Rosenn, she and her staff work with congregations, lay leaders, and rabbis to raise awareness of the Syrian refugee issue on both the Jewish and national agendas.”

In addition, a December 2, 2015 HIAS letter “signed by more than 1,250 American rabbis was delivered to all members of Congress and printed as a newspaper ad.

Invoking the biblical commandment to welcome the stranger and the ill-fated 1939 voyage of Jewish refugees from the Nazis on the St. Louis, the letter warned lawmakers not to confuse an actual enemy with the victims of that enemy.

According to the report, the HIAS letter “made an impression in the corridors of power,” because a few days later, “Obama mentioned HIAS twice in his remarks at the annual White House Hanukkah party, and a HIAS client lighted the menorah.”

According to Rosenn, around “1,000 American Jews, motivated by High Holiday sermons on the refugee crisis by hundreds of rabbis (many of them incorporating material prepared by Rosenn and her team), have contacted HIAS asking to volunteer with the Syrian refugees.”

Rosenn admitted that Islamic terrorism was a potential problem, but said that her education was engaging in “education” to overcome these “fears.”


“Everyone is afraid of terrorism. The problem is that the fear became misplaced due to misinformation, which is amplified by politicians. There is a real lack of understanding of how the US resettlement program works,” Rosenn said.

Rosenn believes that anti-refugee rhetoric can be very toxic. “We as Jews know just how dangerous this rhetoric can be. And we also know historically that in our country’s more glorious moments, it has been able to overcome this fear and suspicion.

“This is a profoundly Jewish issue and this is an historic moment. Never before have Jews not been refugees, but rather in a position to help refugees. Jews want to respond,” she said.


However, in Israel, which Rosenn and every other official Jewish organization in the US, both secular and religious, fanatically support, absolutely no refugees of any sort, Muslim or otherwise, are allowed in.

For example, according to a report in the Jerusalem Post, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared that Israel “won’t accept refugees from Syria.”

The Jerusalem Post quoted Netanyahu as saying that the building of a “security fence” on Israel’s eastern border will stop the “flood of illegal migrants into the country.”

Image


Jews Push Muslim “Refugees” on US
February 9, 2016 by TNO Staff— in North America · 16 Comments

America’s only officially state-funded Jewish “refugee” organization, the Hebrew Immigration Aid Society (HIAS), works full time to bring as many nonwhite—and mainly Muslim—invaders as possible into the US—but at the same time supports Israel which refuses to grant access to any of these “refugees.”

TOI-rabbi-refugees

According to a Times of Israel interview with HIAS vice president, Rabbi Jennie Rosenn, HIAS, which was originally started to promote Jewish immigration into America, now works on bringing Third World “refugees” into the US.

To add insult to injury, this private Jewish organization is funded by federal grants from the US Department of State and the US Department of Health and Human Services, the UNHCR and private contributions, the Times of Israel added.

HIAS, the Times of Israel continues, “offers refugees a variety of free services, including legal assistance for gaining their rights and becoming identified for resettlement,” and Rosenn is the “rabbi who rallies American Jews for the global refugee cause.”

However, this rallying American Jews “for the global refugee cause” does not extend as far as allowing them to settle in Israel, but only in Europe and America.

The Times of Israel—which, as its name implies, is an Israeli-based newspaper, says that it has “been Rosenn’s task to engage American Jews with HIAS and the refugee issue, primarily in the area of advocacy aimed at significantly increasing the number of refugees allowed into the US.”

Part of this “HIAS advocacy” includes, Rosenn said, asking the Obama administration for an “additional 100,000 refugees per year.”

The Times of Israel continued: “According to a strategy devised by Rosenn, she and her staff work with congregations, lay leaders, and rabbis to raise awareness of the Syrian refugee issue on both the Jewish and national agendas.”

In addition, a December 2, 2015 HIAS letter “signed by more than 1,250 American rabbis was delivered to all members of Congress and printed as a newspaper ad.

Invoking the biblical commandment to welcome the stranger and the ill-fated 1939 voyage of Jewish refugees from the Nazis on the St. Louis, the letter warned lawmakers not to confuse an actual enemy with the victims of that enemy.

According to the report, the HIAS letter “made an impression in the corridors of power,” because a few days later, “Obama mentioned HIAS twice in his remarks at the annual White House Hanukkah party, and a HIAS client lighted the menorah.”
READ “F**k Your Racist Borders”

According to Rosenn, around “1,000 American Jews, motivated by High Holiday sermons on the refugee crisis by hundreds of rabbis (many of them incorporating material prepared by Rosenn and her team), have contacted HIAS asking to volunteer with the Syrian refugees.”

Rosenn admitted that Islamic terrorism was a potential problem, but said that her education was engaging in “education” to overcome these “fears.”

“Everyone is afraid of terrorism. The problem is that the fear became misplaced due to misinformation, which is amplified by politicians. There is a real lack of understanding of how the US resettlement program works,” Rosenn said.

Rosenn believes that anti-refugee rhetoric can be very toxic. “We as Jews know just how dangerous this rhetoric can be. And we also know historically that in our country’s more glorious moments, it has been able to overcome this fear and suspicion.

“This is a profoundly Jewish issue and this is an historic moment. Never before have Jews not been refugees, but rather in a position to help refugees. Jews want to respond,” she said.

However, in Israel, which Rosenn and every other official Jewish organization in the US, both secular and religious, fanatically support, absolutely no refugees of any sort, Muslim or otherwise, are allowed in.

For example, according to a report in the Jerusalem Post, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared that Israel “won’t accept refugees from Syria.”

The Jerusalem Post quoted Netanyahu as saying that the building of a “security fence” on Israel’s eastern border will stop the “flood of illegal migrants into the country.”
READ Jews Set “Road Map” for FPÖ

Jersualem-Post-Netanyahu-border1

An earlier statement from Netanyahu’s office quoted the Prime Minister saying that “Israel is a small country, a very small country, that lacks demographic and geographic depth. Therefore, we must control our borders, against both illegal migrants and terrorism.”

Image

It seems as if Jews in Israel can be concerned about Muslim terrorism and illegal immigration, but Europeans in Europe and America have to be “educated” out of such fears by Rosenn’s HIAS.

In fact, Israel has also made it illegal for any non-Jew, as racially defined by that state, to immigrate to Israel at all, no matter where they come from.

This attitude is not limited to American Jews. The World Jewish Congress (WJC)—the official representative body of all religious and secular Jewish organizations in the world, said in an official statement penned by its Deputy CEO for Diplomacy, Maram Stern, that “closing Europe’s borders is not the right answer to the refugee crisis.

With staggering chutzpah, the WJC went on to say that it would be “immoral” of Europe to close its borders—even though this is exactly what the Jewish state has done.

Image

To underline the hypocrisy, the WJC has an entire division devoted to “supporting Israel”—even though that state implements the exact opposite policy which the WJC demands of Europe.

Image

HIAS is not alone in demanding that America accepts the nonwhite “refugees.”

The Anti-Defamation League’s national director, Jonathan Greenblatt, said in a formal statement that:

As Jews, we are particularly affected by the images of men, women, and children forced to flee their homes to save themselves only to find they are unwanted anyplace else. World leaders must not turn their backs on the fundamental commitment to refugee protection and should work to settle these families in a humane and just manner.

Image

Once again, this doesn’t seem to apply to Israel. Of course, the ADL fanatically supports Israel and has an entire section devoted to explaining to its supporters how to defend Israel.

Image

As if this was not enough, the Israeli state-funded foreign aid agency, IsraAID, has employees—Israeli nationals—on the ground in Greece and the Balkans, quite literally carrying the nonwhite invaders ashore.

Image

Why do Jews all over the world demand that America and Europe accept millions of nonwhite invaders, while at the same time building walls to protect Israel and barring any invaders from entering their country?

This obvious Jewish hypocrisy cannot be an accident. It must be malicious—there is simply no other explanation.

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:42 am

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 73,00.html

'Islamization of Europe a good thing'

Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should 'rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.' He praises Islam for promoting modesty, respect for God

Kobi Nahshoni|Published: 11.11.12 , 13:52

As concerns grow over the increasing number of Muslims in Europe, it appears not everyone is bothered by the issue, including an Israeli rabbi who even welcomes the phenomenon.

Rabbi Baruch Efrati, a yeshiva head and community rabbi in the West Bank settlement of Efrat, believes that the Islamization of Europe is actually a good thing.

"With the help of God, the gentiles there will adopt a healthier life with a lot of modesty and integrity, and not like the hypocritical Christianity which appears pure but is fundamentally corrupt," he explained.

Rabbi Efrati was asked to discuss the issue by an oriental studies student, who inquired on Judaism's stand toward the process Europe has been going through in recent years.

Following the election of a hijab-wearing Muslim woman as the mayor of the Bosnian city of Visoko for the first time in continent's history, the student asked the rabbi on the Kipa website: "How do we fight the Islamization of Europe and return it to the hands of Christians and moderates?"

Efrati wrote in response that the Islamization of Europe was better than a Christian Europe for ethical and theological reasons – as a punishment against Christians for persecuting the Jews and the fact that Christianity, as opposed to Islam, is considered "idolatry" from a halachic point of view.

"Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years were in exile there," the rabbi explained as the ethical reason for favoring Muslims, quoting shocking descriptions from the Rishonim literature (written by leading rabbis who lived during the 11th to 15th centuries) about pogroms and mass murders committed by Christians against Jews.

"We will never forgive Europe's Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly… Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity…

"A now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won't be able to atone for."

'Islam a relatively honest religion'

The theological reason, according to Rabbi Efrati, is that Christianity – which he sees as idolatry – has a tendency to "destroy normal life and abstain from it on the one hand, while losing modesty on the other hand," as it "ranges between radical monasticism to radical Western licentiousness."

Islam, the rabbi added, is "a religion which misjudges its prophets but is relatively honest. It educates a bit more for a stable life of marriage and creation, where there is certain modesty and respect for God."

Efrati ruled, therefore, that "even if we are in a major war with the region's Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity."

He added, however, that Jews must pray that the Islamization of most of Europe will not harm the people of Israel.

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:43 am

I recommend people grab this book.

Image

Link

And read the following chapters.

Culture Parasitism — 376
Culture Distortion — 402
Culture Retardation as a Form of Culture Distortion — 410
Culture Distortion Arising from Parasitic Activity — 416


You can probably guess what left wing people of what religious/cultural persuasion he is talking about.

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:43 am

Jews in Europe: "Refugees welcome", "Islam is peace"

Jews in America: "Open borders!", "Legalize illegal aliens!", "Prohibit guns!" "Abandon the 1st &2nd Amendment!"

Jews in Israel: "Close all borders build a wall!" "Put black Jews into interment camps and deport them to Africa!" "Kill all Arabs!" "Deport Palestinians to other Arab countries!" "Every settler needs to have a M16 on his back!"

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:44 am

Why do I mention this physics professor? Because he's another meddling marxist Jew.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-38597714
Police treat home secretary speech as 'hate incident'
12 January 2017

West Midlands Police has said the home secretary's speech to last year's Conservative Party conference is being treated as a "hate incident".

In the speech, Amber Rudd suggested tightening rules that allow UK firms to recruit workers from overseas.

An Oxford University professor complained to the force claiming Ms Rudd was using "hate speech" to foster support for her political aims.

But West Midlands police said no crime had been committed.

A Home Office spokesperson said: "This was not a hate crime. The Home Secretary has been crystal clear that hatred has absolutely no place in a Britain that works for everyone.

"She's made countering hate one of her key priorities, indeed one of the first public interventions she made was to launch the Hate Crime Action Plan."

Danny Shaw, BBC home affairs correspondent, said West Midlands Police had assessed the complaint but it had not been formally investigated.

However, it had to be recorded as a "non-crime hate incident" in accordance with police national guidelines.

These state: "Where any person, including police personnel, reports a hate incident which would not be the primary responsibility of another agency, it must be recorded regardless of whether or not they are the victim, and irrespective of whether there is any evidence to identify the hate element."

'Not heard speech'

Professor Joshua Silver, who made the complaint, told BBC News: "Some politicians have been using hate crime as an instrument to foster support for their political aims."

He said he would consider whether the police response was "satisfactory" and said he was taking legal advice with a view to taking "further action".

However, during an interview on BBC2's Daily Politics, Prof Silver admitted he had not listened to Ms Rudd's speech, which did not include any reference to keeping lists of foreign workers.

"I didn't actually see the speech, but I've read the draft... I've read the speech carefully and I've looked at all the feedback," he said.

"It's discriminating against foreigners - you pick on them and say we want to give jobs to British people and not to foreigners. It was interpreted that way."

Furious row

Former Conservative Home Secretary Michael Howard, speaking on the same programme, dismissed the claims.

"Of course it wasn't a hate incident," he said. "What Amber Rudd said was no different from Gordon Brown [former Labour prime minister] when he said there should be British jobs for British workers.

"I think Mr Silver should be thoroughly ashamed of himself because what he's doing is to bring a well-intentioned piece of legislation into disrepute."

West Midlands Police said it was not aware that it had received any other complaints about Ms Rudd's speech, which provoked a furious row at the time.

Asked on BBC Radio 4's Today programme whether she was prepared to "name and shame" companies which did not comply by publishing a breakdown of the nationality of their workforce, she said it was "not something we are definitely going to do" but it was "one of the tools" under review "as a way of nudging people into better behaviour".

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/headli ... incident_/
Oxford professor Joshua Silver reported Home Secretary's speech to police as 'hate incident'

11 hrs ago / Luke Sproule, Education reporter covering Rose Hill, Iffley and Littlemore.

A speech made by the Home Secretary has been logged as a 'hate incident' by police after a complaint was made by an Oxford academic.

Physics professor Joshua Silver from Oxford University reported Amber Rudd's speech at the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham in October to West Midlands Police.

The Daily Telegraph reported that Prof Silver did not actually see the speech, and made the complaint to officers based on a draft.

Ms Rudd had set out a number of possibly measures to reduce immigration, including new restrictions on recruiting overseas workers and students, during the address in Birmingham in October.

She said ministers would consider whether new tests should be imposed to ensure those coming to the UK are "filling gaps in the labour market, not taking jobs British people could do".

The Times reported that Prof Silver, director of the Centre for Vision in the Developing World, based at St Catherine’s College, was so concerned he reported the speech to police.

He told the BBC: "Some politicians have been using hate crime as an instrument to foster support for their political aims."

West Midlands Police said the complaint had to be recorded as a "non-crime hate incident" in accordance with guidelines.

There was no evidence of a hate crime being committed, the force added.

National guidance for police states: "Where any person, including police personnel, reports a hate incident which would not be the primary responsibility of another agency, it must be recorded regardless of whether or not they are the victim, and irrespective of whether there is any evidence to identify the hate element."

A Home Office spokeswoman said: "This was not a hate crime.The Home Secretary has been crystal clear that hatred has absolutely no place in a Britain that works for everyone.

"She's made countering hate one of her key priorities, indeed one of the first public interventions she made was to launch the Hate Crime Action Plan."

In the wake of Ms Rudd's speech, suggestions that businesses may be asked to disclose information on the number of foreign workers they employ sparked a furious backlash.

Ministers later insisted any data gathered would not be published and it was not about "naming and shaming" firms.

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 2846
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Charles Traynor » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:01 pm

Very informative. Excellent choice of topic, Werd. I doubt we will be seeing much of Kleon XYZ Contagion here though.
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Mon May 08, 2017 9:43 pm

By engaging in cultural parasitism/distortion by opening up the borders and telling Europeans to live with the worst kind of third world filth while they do not have to do any such thing in their own neighbourhoods or even in Israel.

Jewish Hypocrisy - Flooding Europe with Immigrants

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4c8FYcKWJzY

Stefan Molyneux asks jew why the hypocrisy on immigration

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q8BLfefGtg

Zionist Jews Admit That Mass Immigration Is #1 On Their Agenda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpnYpQaHAuc

Rabbi: Jews are fighting alongside their Muslim brothers against Old Europe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsJYGoRHA-U

Regarding the double standard on immigration, people always want to call out hypocrisy when they see it so when the Jews get upset and misdirect and say, "It's because I'm Jewish you hate me," people will start to think there is something intrinsic in the way Jews are raised in their Jewish culture that motivates them to wreck societies with multiculturalism and then get upset when people call them on it.

Werd
Posts: 8655
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins

Post by Werd » Tue May 09, 2017 6:20 am

Now that Jews are trying to be friends with the gentiles again since immigration is too Muslim (Muslims largely hate Jews as well as Christians or atheists), the gentiles need to take a different tactic.

Instead of welcoming refugees and basically offering up their civilization and their women on a platter basically prostrating to the Muslims, just tell the new Muslim immigrants where the Jews are living. Show them where the schools, homes, synagogues and businesses are so that these obviously tolerant, and well behaved Muslims can go say thank you to them. :lol:

If the Jews are trying to send the Muslims into our neighbourhoods, let's beat them at their own game. Send the Muslims to the Jews. Why should the Jews care? Muslims are all innocent victims and most assuredly don't hate Israel, women, and gays, right?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests