Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

The RODOH Lounge is a place for general discussion, preferably non-Holocaust. The Lounge is only lightly moderated but please keep this a friendly place to chat with and get to know your fellow board participants.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Nick Terry and the numbers

Post by Nessie »

Huntinger wrote:
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:19 pm
Nessie wrote:
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:00 pm
Best stick to what can be evidenced to have happened, using original documents, eye witnesses and contemporary physical evidence, along with evidence later gathered in archaeological and forensic examinations.
Good advice and one the exterminists should try; the only documents they have are adminicles, unreliable contradictory eye witness testimony, no physical evidence of consequence, no forensic or archaeological evidence except that provided by compromised parties like the Soviet and Polish extraordinary commissions.
Typical denier, thinks he does not need to evidence his claims. Thinks it is up to others to evidence he is wrong. :roll:
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:20 pm
Uh-huh, we should stick to dubious documents, lying eyewitnesses, physical evidence such as that claimed by Lukaszkiewicz, Kola, et al. and the unproven forensic examinations. You betcha'. That's the ticket...in holyhoax la-la land.
How about you produce credible evidence from eye witnesses, documents, physical items and archaeological or forensic examinations to show what did happen.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 9398
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Huntinger »

Nessie wrote:
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:24 pm

How about you produce credible evidence from eye witnesses, documents, physical items and archaeological or forensic examinations to show what did happen.
Didn't the Soviet Extraordinary Commission do a good job of hiding their crimes. With a staff of 7 million, it is amazing the outcome.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
How about you produce credible evidence from eye witnesses, documents, physical items and archaeological or forensic examinations to show what did happen.
Mattogno, Graf, Kues and a host of others have proven your holyhoax claims to be bullshit.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Nessie »

Huntinger wrote:
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:27 pm
Nessie wrote:
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:24 pm

How about you produce credible evidence from eye witnesses, documents, physical items and archaeological or forensic examinations to show what did happen.
Didn't the Soviet Extraordinary Commission do a good job of hiding their crimes.
No.
With a staff of 7 million, it is amazing the outcome.
We know about their crimes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_crimes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_mo ... eph_Stalin
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Turnagain »

What bullshit. Your claims of gassing have been debunked to a fare thee well. No steam chambers. No gas chambers. No vacuum chambers. The statements of credible eyewitnesses are evidence that the AR camps were transit/customs camps. Sell your drivel down the street, Nessie.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:30 pm
What bullshit. Your claims of gassing have been debunked to a fare thee well. No steam chambers. No gas chambers. No vacuum chambers. The statements of credible eyewitnesses are evidence that the AR camps were transit/customs camps. Sell your drivel down the street, Nessie.
Kulawy, Seder and Schwartz (IIRC) are the three who describe staying in Treblinka. You weasel dodge that no one who worked inside TII mentions deportees staying in the camp temporarily, the existence of mass showers for deportees and you cannot identify from any plan of TII where accommodation barracks existed. Wiernik reported he stayed one night at Malkinia before he went to TII. Malkinia was a transit camp a few kms north of TII. The more logical and credible explanation is that the three thought they were at the death camp, TII, but they were at Malkinia.

You weasel dodge those issues. Just as you weasel dodge not being able to evidence mass daily departures from TII to anywhere else, leaving c840,000 who arrived at TII and never left.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
You weasel dodge that no one who worked inside TII mentions deportees staying in the camp temporarily...
Nessie can't produce one credible witness to the atrocities that allegedly occurred at T-II but he's quoting them about the camp facilities.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:56 pm
Nessie wrote:
You weasel dodge that no one who worked inside TII mentions deportees staying in the camp temporarily...
Nessie can't produce one credible witness to the atrocities that allegedly occurred at T-II but he's quoting them about the camp facilities.
You weasel dodge stating what you would find credible witness evidence to gassings, since you have decided, based on arguments from logical fallacies to think up excuses not to believe any witness.

You weasel dodge that none of the witness who think they stayed at TII describe the same camp as those who worked at TII.

You weasel dodge that there is no evidence from any source at all, of daily mass transports back out of TII.

You weasel dodge that there was Malkinia transit camp a few kms from TII, which Wiernik said he stayed at for a night before going to TII.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Holocaust controversies thinks Nessie is a spammer

Post by Turnagain »

Well, go ahead and name your Jew eyewitness and explain why we should believe him.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests