International Jewry's policy of misinformation

The RODOH Lounge is a place for general discussion, preferably non-Holocaust. The Lounge is only lightly moderated but please keep this a friendly place to chat with and get to know your fellow board participants.
User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9988
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
Article on Jewish censorship including censorship of details of the corruption of Joe Biden and his family.
Progressive journalists Chris Hedges & Matt Taibbi discuss the extreme censorship of alleged corruption by Joe Biden… The Intercept censored its own founder Glenn Greenwald’s attempt to report it…

This is reminiscent of media omission on Palestine, and the previous cancelling of one of the most famous journalists of the twentieth century, who was erased from history when she began to tell Americans about Palestinians… And the efforts to suppress Grace Halsell’s 1970s exposé on Israeli torture…


It’s valuable that two highly respected progressive journalists, Chris Hedges and Matt Taibbi, recently discussed the censorship by mainstream media and social media platforms of the explosive information showing alleged corruption by Joe Biden and his family.

Glenn Greenwald
The latest casualty of the censorship has been Glenn Greenwald, the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who resigned from the news organization he founded, when its editors insisted on censoring his article on Biden. (See the details here and here.)

The only thing I would add to their strong interview would be to note that the New York Times and other media – including “alternative media” (e.g. see this and this) – have a long long record of failing to cover important information about Israel-Palestine.

Dorothy Thompson
...According to the Britannica encyclopedia, Dorothy Thompson was “one of the most famous journalists of the twentieth century.” And yet, well before the end of the 20th century, she was “erased from history,” in the words of her biographer, because of her reporting on Palestine. Today she is virtually unknown.

...The article doesn’t mention Thompson’s reporting on what some call the “Palestinian holocaust,” and the fact that Israel partisans then worked to destroy her livelihood because of it. As Thompson wrote, there was a ruthless campaign against her of “career assassination and character assassination.”

Image
Dorothy Thompson

She had a column that was syndicated worldwide, reaching 9 million readers through 170 newspapers, and was the highest paid lecturer in the United States. Time magazine put her on the cover in 1939 and said that apart from Eleanor Roosevelt she was the most influential woman in the United States.
Despite her unprecedented renown, after Thompson traveled to Palestine and began to write and speak about that issue, Israel advocates turned on her, using their power to end her career. One by one, major media outlets canceled her. Today, when there are women’s studies departments around the country and frequent focus on women’s rights, very few have heard about the journalist who for many years was the most famous woman journalist in America.

Grace Halsell
A similarly courageous woman who suffered a similar fate was Grace Halsell – another top journalist you’ve probably never heard about.

Image
Grace Halsell in the 1940’s

A preeminent journalist who had authored several acclaimed books on diverse social issues, Halsell travelled to Israel in 1980 and wrote a powerful and moving book about what she found there – including Israel’s torture of Palestinians.
She later reported about the media censorship she encountered when she tried to get the information to the American public:
“On a trip to Washington, DC, I hand-delivered a letter to Frank Mankiewicz, then head of the public radio station WETA. I explained I had taped interviews with Palestinians who had been brutally tortured. And I’d make them available to him. I got no reply. I made several phone calls. Eventually I was put through to a public relations person, a Ms. Cohen, who said my letter had been lost. I wrote again. In time I began to realize what I hadn’t known: had it been Jews who were strung up and tortured, it would be news. But interviews with tortured Arabs were “lost” at WETA.”
Cancel culture began long ago, and was largely overlooked as Israel continued its ruthless ethnic cleansing project and daily violence against Palestinians.

Now the media censors are coming for others…

Below are four articles by Greenwald and Taibbi about the recent pro-Biden censorship:
By Alison Weir

Go here to read the censored articles on Joe Biden that Alison is discussing https://israelpalestinenews.org/hedges- ... 0ctQHpWers
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9988
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
Here is an excerpt from an article written by an Israeli Jew about hasbara groups and their tactics.
He is a pro-Palestinian campaigner so he speaks from personal experience of their tactics of hate and misinformation.

Enjoy! :)
Peaceful activism for Palestinian rights on college campuses and elsewhere has long been targeted heavily by nationalist groups like Hasbara Fellowships, Hillel, and others who present Israel as a fun, wonder-filled beacon of democracy and haven for Jewish people while feeding into islamophobic and anti-Arab sentiments.

We see this in the continued attempts to brand Muslim and Arab students as inherently “violent” or supporting terrorism. Students who support Israel are presented as fearful of attacks and vulnerable while in fact, those who highlight Palestinian rights face harassment and defamation campaigns that follow them for the rest of their academic and professional careers.

Most, if not all, speakers who are invited to speak on campus on the issue of Palestine have experienced the hateful, vicious attacks by Zionist groups who campaign to silence the Palestinian voice. Granted, some experience this more and some less, but the Zionist reach seems to have no boundaries and they are more vigilant and hateful than ever before.

Hasbara
Zionist groups represent a racist, supremacist, and violent ideology. They defend a state that is engaged in the worst type of violence against the Palestinian people, yet they feel that they are in a position to question the motives of organizers, speakers, and activists who call for justice and tolerance.

Hillel, for example, writes on its website, that “Israel is at the heart of Hillel’s work.” They fully admit that their goal is “to inspire every Jewish college student to develop a meaningful and enduring relationship to Israel.” They want every Jewish student to have a “meaningful” relationship with Israel, which has from its very inception destroyed, stolen, killed, and imposed a violent racist regime in Palestine.

Hillel further says that “Engaged and educated students can become committed Jewish adults who are passionate supporters of Israel.” One has to wonder what kind of hate-filled indoctrination must be used in order to cultivate “passionate” support for an apartheid state.

My most recent experience was with a Candian Zionist organization called Hasbara Fellowships. On their website, Hasbara Fellowships write, “We envision North American college campuses to be a place where Zionists feel empowered to openly celebrate the Jewish State without fear or exclusion.” How is one empowered to celebrate a state that keeps millions of people under its control, deprived of water and food, and determines who has access to medical care based on whether or not they are Jewish?

As for the misleading use of the name “Jewish State,” the majority of Jewish people around the world choose not to live in Israel. The majority of the population governed by the State of Israel are not Jewish, but Palestinian Muslims and Christians who are subjected to systemic racism and violence. How then is Israel a “Jewish” state?

Furthermore, this so-called Jewish State has been denounced by Ultra-Orthodox Rabbis and secular Jews alike for over 100 years. Zionism never represented Jews or Jewish identity, or for that matter, Jewish self-determination...

...“Pro-Israel” means pro-violence and pro-apartheid. It means being pro a regime which has taken Palestine, and like wildfire, destroyed everything in its path.

Zionism embraces (and various Zionist groups promote) a racist, supremacist ideology that has brought death, homelessness, and destruction to millions of Palestinians.

~~ Excerpt from an article by Israeli Jew Miko Peled

https://www.mintpressnews.com/how-hasba ... ce/273348/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9988
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9988
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
Watch Mark straightfaced lying and repeatedly dodging simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’questions.


https://youtu.be/o1MZOtKYnfM
been-there wrote:
Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:58 am
...a few massively dominant [Jewish-owned] social media corporations — Facebook, Twitter, Instagram [+ GOOGLE] — have become in effect the “gatekeepers” to internet traffic.

In the Assange hearing and Hunter Biden cases we see perhaps the first overt use of that coordinated power to control public information worldwide.

The way the power of the “gatekeepers” is used normally is insidious. It is quite deliberately disguised. “Shadow banning” is a term for a technique which has many variations. The net result is always that the post is not ostensibly banned. Some people see it, so that if the subject of the suppression claims to be banned they look stupid. But it is in fact shown to far, far less people than it would normally be. So even members of my own immediate family find that my posts no longer turn up in their timeline on either Facebook or Twitter. But a few followers, presumably at random, do see them. Generally, though not always, those followers are apparently able to retweet or share, but what they are not told is that their retweet or share is in fact put in to very, very few people’s timelines. The overall audience for the Tweet or Facebook post is cut to as little as 1% of what it might be without suppression. As 90% of the traffic to this blog comes in clicks from these social media posts, the effect is massive.

That was the technique used on the Assange hearing. In normal times, the ratchet on traffic can be screwed down or released a little, from week to week or post to post.

In the Hunter Biden case, social media went still further and without disguise simply banned all mention of the Hunter Biden leaks.

As I reported on September 27 last year:
What I find deeply reprehensible in all the BBC coverage is their failure to report the facts of the case, and their utter lack of curiosity about why Joe Biden’s son Hunter was paid $60,000 a month by Burisma, Ukraine’s largest natural gas producer, as an entirely absent non-executive director, when he had no relevant experience in Ukraine or gas, and very little business experience, having just been dishonorably discharged from the Navy Reserve for use of crack cocaine? Is that question not just a little bit interesting? That may be the thin end of it – in 2014-15 Hunter Biden received US $850,000 from the intermediary company channeling the payments. In reporting on Trump being potentially impeached for asking about it, might you not expect some analysis – or at least mention – of what he was asking about?
That Hunter Biden received so much money from a company he never once visited or did any legitimate work for, located in a country which remarkably at the same time launched into a US sponsored civil war while his father was Vice President, is a question which might reasonably interest people. This is not “fake news”. There is no doubt whatsoever of the facts. There is also no doubt that, as Vice President of the USA, Joe Biden secured the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma for corruption.

The story now is that Hunter Biden abandoned a laptop in a repair shop, and the hard drive contained emails between Hunter and Burisma in which he was asked for, and promised, various assistance to the company from the Vice President. This hard drive was passed to the New York Post.
What the emails do not include is any incriminating correspondence between Hunter and his father in which Joe Biden agrees to any of this — which speaks to their authenticity, as that would be the key thing to forge. Given that the hard drive also contains intimate photos and video, there does not seem to be any real doubt about its authenticity.

However both Facebook and Twitter slapped an immediate and total ban on all mention of the Hunter Biden emails, claiming doubts as to its authenticity and an astonishing claim that they never link to leaked material or information about leaked material.

~~ ex-British Ambassador, Craig Murray
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives ... xI567ZFoog
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9988
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

In Germany, the land of Gutenberg, the so-called press is little more than a deputised press office for NATO, and by extension the Washington regime and the liberal ideology that it acts as a fountainhead to. From Der Spiegel to Die Welt, modern German media has its genesis in the rubble of the Second World War, where publications were founded for and sometimes by the occupying Allied forces. Each outlet had to apply to get a licence from the Allied command to operate, no different than the Soviet bloc. 75 years on and the modern German press pack follows in this lineage through the Cold War and into Merkel’s multicultural Germany.

The dirty secret of Berlin, like the preceding West German administration, is that it is the mirror image of the deposed GDR, in the sense of merely being a satellite state for foreign powers. Germany is not an independent country, and the powers that be are eager to stamp out any trace of residual national self-assertion as demographics alter on the back of mass immigration. Real German autonomy was liquidated post-1945, with what passes itself off as the German state today just a vestigial Americanised appendage.

America has an open military presence in the nation, with Germans just left to grumble as the NSA and CIA operate with impunity, bugging the phones of Angela Merkel and other officials. The country’s main opposition party, the AfD, undergoes routine and overt state harassment from the Bundesnachrichtendienst security forces, effectively acting as a sister organisation to the CIA.

Against this tide of anti-national conformism is the story of Udo Ulfkotte, his life in journalism and Pauline conversion from the comfy life of an establishment operator to patriotic recusant. It is a story which has barely entered the airwaves in Germany and is largely unknown in the English-speaking world, blowing a hole in the narrative of the open society mythos that Western societies gloat of.

Udo Ulfkotte : ‘Alpha Journalist’ to National Dissident

For the first 40 years of his life the German journalist Udo Ulfkotte led a rather conventional albeit successful life as a correspondent for numerous titles, the right leaning Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) chief among them where he acted as assistant editor. Following completing a PhD in Middle Eastern studies at the University of Freiburg, Ulfkotte spent 12 years as a foreign correspondent in mainly the Middle East before settling more on domestic affairs in Germany.

Reporting from war zones from Kurdistan to Afghanistan, he was a regular for the FAZ and other magazines as well, playing an active part in centrist politics through his affiliation with the CDU linked Konrad Adenauer Foundation he also enjoyed lecturer positions.

Image
Udo Ulfkotte on assignment to a war zone

So far so good, and nothing out of the ordinary. By the early 2000s Ulfkotte looked set to be just another face and Twitter handle in the nation’s grey journalistic clergy, potentially with a route into politics after enough time. This began to change in the mid 2000s, as Ulfkotte began to stray more and more from the established orthodoxy on matters of Russia, immigration and Germany’s relationship with the United States, before leaving the FAZ all together by 2004.

He proceeded to found an independent magazine, “Whistleblowers”, where he documented stories otherwise forgotten by the German fourth estate. Almost immediately after his departure from FAZ, his apartment was raided by German police, and his computer confiscated with the excuse of threats to national security being given. It was the first of many raids and constant harassment received by Ulfkotte by German authorities.

In the years following, he would document the corruption within German journalism he witnessed as well as abuses in the asylum industry. In an article titled ‘The World Upside Down’, he chronicled the infiltration of Germany by Islamist organisation assisted by Gulf money, as well as inadequcies in the asylum process.

Increasingly he would burn bridges with his former liberal masters and enter the fray of nationalist politics, active in the early PEGIDA movement and a firm critic of immigration and what he alleged was media whitewashing on the matter. Publishing numerous books on the threats of Islamism in Germany and the recklessness of the German elite, he slotted himself among the German Neue Rechte scene attempting at one stage to run for office on a nationalist ticket.

In 2017 he put pen to paper on his career in journalism with the book ‘Gekaufte Journalisten’ (Bought Journalists) summarising his experiences of media manipulation and nepotism within the industry. At its most charitable, German journalism to him is essentialy prostitution in print, working directly in the pay of a nexus of business and political elites directing Germany down the tubes of globalism and mass immigration.

‘Two out of three journalists in German-speaking countries are corrupt – and find it quite normal’ he writes painting a picture of the industry acting as little more than a CIA backed cartel. Through various keystone organisations (Aspen Institute, Marshall Fund, Bilderberg Group as well as the European Council of Foreign relations) marching orders are given to a compliant media on what to report.

These media functionaries are what Ulfkotte labels ‘alpha journalists,’ recruited informally through an intelligence network and making opulent livings in the process. It is a role that Ulfkotte himself played having been recruited from college and performing his duties hand in hand with intelligence agencies.

His experiences recount a world of wine dinners, foreign junkets and CIA affiliated think tanks giving instruction to writers, even writing stories for them. To his shame, on various occasions he simply signed his name to stories written by spooks framing the Gadaffi regime for running secret weapons programmes as well as promoting anti-Russian hysteria. Towards the end of his career, the pace of anti-Russian propagandising increased, with zero rapprochement being considered by his paymasters who desired nothing but conflict with the Kremlin.

One of the keystone groups in this powerweb is the German Marshall fund, which along with American Embassy, regularly funds and coordinates the media narrative under the guise of securing German-American cooperation. Founded and funded by the lobbyist Guido Goldmann, its fingerprints are almost everywhere in German journalism and politics.

Those dismissive of the role of the financier George Soros will be interested to learn of the prominence the Soros backed European Council of Foreign Relations plays in policy formation, something Ulfkotte experienced first hand. The so-called ‘overthrowing machine’ of Soros, used to mobilise rent a mobs for use in CIA backed regime changes, is no myth as commonly scoffed at by some. In a 2014 interview, Ulfkotte stated how Soros was part and parcel of the political regime in Germany, and essential to efforts expanding American hegemony in Eastern and Central Europe.

Similarly the Atlantic Bridge organisation plays a salient role in maintaining German obedience towards Washington, working regularly under the wing of the CIA to foster a new generation of German sycophants. The Washington Post similarly is described by Ulfkotte as being little more than a CIA front where German journalists sow disinfo against Russia in particular, using material which is often scripted directly by intelligence agencies.

From providing warped coverage on gas attacks in Iraq and covering up German companies profiting off it, to working with oil companies to hide environmental abuses and give ‘lubricated coverage’ to corruption Ulfkotte lived a cynical life. Along with lavish trips abroad and a respectable salary, Ulfkotte also made a killing through the lecturing circuit

As a foreign correspondent he was chauffeured around Gulf capitals and given privy intelligence files on the basis he would provide pro-NATO coverage. A theme of his career, and allegedly the majority of senior German journalists, was the unofficial bribes given so as to secure positive coverage. Sometimes manifesting itself in overt gifts or positions in think tanks or academia, it ensures a well oiled and sycophantic media machine at Washtington’s beck and call. Ulfkotte makes it clear that anyone in a position of power in German journalism attained that position through this incestrous system of selection.

For example, in 1996, Ulfkotte was accused by human rights groups of covering up environmental damage in the Nigerian Delta by the Shell Oil corporation. At the time Ulfkotte was receiving patronage from the oil giant in the form of concealed sponsorship.

A staple of the diet of any so-called conspiracy theorist, the role of the Trilateral Commission is also examined, of which Ulfkotte was a regular attendee before his fall from grace. Recalling chauffeur driven journeys to exclusive hotels in the Italian Alps, Ulfkotte states that the Yugoslavian wars were planned well in advance, judging by meetings he attended.

Another feature in the system is the self aggrandising awards given annually to journalists for services rendered, made ironic by the fact they are in fact serving the system rather than challenging it.

A regular technique frequently employed by the business lobby is the purchasing of sympathetic articles in German titles with what is euphemistically called ‘auxiliary income’ provided to journalists and publications for services rendered.

Ulfkotte’s sympathy towards this dispensation wore thin when asked to orchestrate a smear campaign against a wayward CDU politician, framing him as an adulterer. Smear attacks are a regular tactic of the regime, and were used against the left leaning Thilo Sarrazin when he objected to mass immigration into Germany.

For his troubles denouncing the German regime and former colleagues, Ulfkotte earned himself the attention of the intelligence agencies who raided his house on multiple occasions, beginning with his Dresden flat in 2004. His work went largely uncommented on in the media arena, even experiencing problems with publication and translation but regardless sold well. Earlier on in his career some of his earlier books were taken off the shelves by publishers following legal threats.

Where he was mentioned it is with derision as little more than a conspiracy theorist, latent fascist, as well as a Kremlin propagandist. It is very hard for the German elite to write off Ulfkotte, who earned his stripes as one of their own, and far from being a rambling conspiracy theorist, his writings are based off of his first hand accounts at the coalface of journalism.

Ulfkotte is not the only one to portray this shoddy clientelism between journalism and the transatlantic lobby, with the journalist Uwe Kruger similarly mapping out the quiet networks which move German life and their corruption of journalism. In 2009, the historian Alan Axelrod published ‘Selling the War’, highlighting the historic influence that American intelligence agencies and third party groups had on journalism in Europe from Woodrow Wilson right up until the Afghan War. In 2006 Wikileaks published the hidden findings of the Schaefer report detailing the extensive relationship German journalists had with the security forces.

Ulfkotte’s death

Udo Ulfkotte was found dead of a sudden heart attack in January of 2017 at the time he was not known to be suffering any major health issues. The writer Jonas Schneider gathered considerable evidence as to the author’s murder, pointing to very clear ambiguties in the autopsy as well as existing threats to Ulfkotte’s life.

While not definitive, it at least makes a reasonable case as to the presence of foul play. Personally, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and a rogue journalist turning up dead suddenly may not necessarily involve murder. 57 year olds very often have sudden heart attacks and after pursuing the evidence there appears to be no clear smoking gun.

That being said, who really doubts the fact that the vast conspiracy ruling would be willing to murder a journalist? As the death of the journalist Gary Webb who famously died of two gunshots to the head after exposing the drug running operations of the CIA attests, problematic journalists have a habit of disappearing all of a sudden.

Udo Ulkfotte could have lived a comfortable life opting for the security of working under the bosom of the occupational forces in Germany. Instead he may very well have shortened his life in the pursuit of truth and to live according to his moral compass. The vast informal machine of think tanks and civic society organisations which he shone a light on appears for now to have outlived him, but in the decades to come may come face to fact with opponents impossible to stop.

~~ By Ciaran Brennan 20/09/2020

http://www.theburkean.ie/articles/2020/ ... in-germany

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9988
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
Stiflng debate, forbidding discussion, censoring historical fact: Jewish owners of social-media giants Youtube and Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook will not permit ANY informed, historically accurate, factual content that exposes holocaust history errors, flaws and deceptions.
Despite stepped-up efforts to shut us down

Dear Friends,

On November 17 Facebook removed the IHR from its popular social media platform. No reason was given for the abrupt measure, but it was hardly a surprise.

It came right after the publication of three widely distributed media items complaining that Facebook had still not dropped the IHR. These articles were in line with a decade-old campaign by major Jewish-Zionist groups to pressure social media platforms to remove the IHR and other organizations they regard as harmful to their interests.

YouTube, the dominant video platform, had already banned many videos of IHR lectures and podcasts, and Google, the premier online search service, had severely restricted access to hundreds of IHR articles, reviews and other postings.

And last September the company that had been handling our credit card payments and donations for two years suddenly and without explanation cancelled our account. That’s the fourth time a company that handles our credit card processing had cancelled its service with us. (Fortunately, we had already lined up an alternative, and were soon able to restore processing with another company.)

In spite of such difficulties, as well as the problems of Covi-19 restrictions, we’ve kept working productively.

Throughout the past year we continued to reach a large, global audience – through online outreach, our IHR News and Comment e-mail newsletter, social media, interviews, and distribution of books, discs and flyers. (Shortly after we were dropped by Facebook, we got the IHR on two new, but smaller, social media platforms.)

We also kept up regular updating of our main website – www.ihr.org – with relevant news items, insightful commentary, and probing analysis.

The site is also a gateway to our immense library and archive, which serves as a great learning center, globally informing and educating people. We’re gratified that IHR articles, reviews and essays are often distributed by others, or re-posted on websites around the world, many in translation in a range of languages.

Now we face new dangers.

The new president and his fervently pro-Zionist administration, supported by the mainstream media, have made clear their eagerness to crack down on “extremists.” And given that major Zionist groups have for years targeted the IHR as a particularly prominent “extremist” organization, we’re expecting new efforts to silence us.

Among the high-level administration posts to which President Biden has named Zionist Jews are Secretary of State, Treasury Secretary, Attorney General, Homeland Security Secretary, Director of National Intelligence, and White House Chief of Staff.

This is hardly surprising given that the new president has himself openly praised what he calls the “immense” and “outsized” Jewish role in shaping American public life. “Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us – as much or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that’s a fact,” Joe Biden told a gathering of Jewish leaders in May 2013. “Think - behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those [major social-political] changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry,” he said. “The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good.”

We’ve always understood, of course, that our work unmasking the enemies of peace and understanding enrages powerful enemies that want to shut us down. We’re not discouraged by the concerted hate campaign against us. We regard it as a badge of honor.

They target us precisely because we’re effective.

Now, during this time of governmental deceit, systemic media bias, growing national discord, and chronic cultural decay, the need for a vital and effective IHR has never been greater.

It’s more important than ever to raise awareness about the powerful forces that promote war, injustice and oppression, and which put self-serving, partisan interests ahead of what’s best for America and humanity.

Please help us in the struggle for a more just, sane and peaceful world!

Faithfully yours,

Mark Weber

Director, Institute for Historical Review

INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW
http://www.ihr.org/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9988
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

The compulsory, pseudo-historical narrative referred to since the 1970’s as ‘the Holocaust’ is a quasi-religous ‘history’ that permits no dissent, outlaws any skepticism, and punishes by law any refutation of its core and sacrosanct ‘beliefs’.

One of this religion’s ‘high priests’ is Deborah Lipstadt, who is very appropriately a Professor of Religion. Jewish religion.
Lipstadt completed her Masters in 1972 and then her Ph.D. in Near Eastern and Judaic Studies in 1976.
Her doctoral dissertation was entitled "The Zionist Career of Louis Lipsky, 1900–1921".
Lipstadt then became an Assistant Professor of Religion at Emory University in Atlanta in January 1993.
In 1994 she was made a Professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies.
Which is almost a tacit admission that the subject of ‘the holocaust’ at Unversity is a religious topic of study. I.e. it is NOT actually ‘HISTORY’.
Something which David Irving pointed out to her, in person, in front of an audience of students in Australia.
As he described here:
https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/davi ... Q18H5.html

A dialogue between the Professor of Religion and the victim of her smear campaign which they felt the need to deceitfully misrepresent at the very beginning of the big-bucks, Hollywood, Jewish-produced film ironcally called ’DENIAL’.
A deceit which they shamelessly show in their trailer for the film. :o

A lying film about a lying Jewish Professor of Religion called ‘Denial’. :lol: :lol:

It’s psychotic, I’m tellin’ ya! :ugeek:
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests