International Jewry's policy of misinformation

The RODOH Lounge is a place for general discussion, preferably non-Holocaust. The Lounge is only lightly moderated but please keep this a friendly place to chat with and get to know your fellow board participants.
User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

Israelis and American Jews fully agree that the memory of the Holocaust
is an indispensable weapon — one that must be used relentlessly against their common enemy.
..Jewish organisations and individuals thus labour continuously to remind the world of it.
In America, the perpetuation of the Holocaust memory is now a $100-million-a-year enterprise,
part of which is government-funded.


~~ Jewish Israeli author Moshe Leshem, a retired Israeli ambassador to four countries as well as the U.N.
From his book ‘Balaam's Curse’, p. 228.
Also published as ‘Israel alone: how the Jewish state lost its way, and how it can find it again
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

been-there wrote:
Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:58 am
been-there wrote:
Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:22 pm
...ill-informed holocaust true-believers think everyone was gassed and mentioning mass deaths affecting ALL camp inmates (including guards and other staff) by typhus, etc, is a form of 'holocaust denial'.
Extremely low-intelligence and dishonest troll from Loch Ness wrote:
Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:17 am
Mentioning deaths by disease is not a form of denial.
How can one ignorant H-believer be so consistently wrong about so much?
Quite amazing!
Michael Moynihan says ...he is just another Holocaust denier.

It’s important to remember that the skilled Holocaust denier parses, dissects, and molests language, quibbling with the word “denial” — they [Holocaust deniers] typically acknowledge that many Jews died, but were victims of various typhus epidemics.”
~~
https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-hass ... -holocaust
Check out what The Tablet wrote about Moynihan when he joined them as a journalist:

“Though he is not a member of the tribe, Michael is an obsessive-compulsive observer of Jewish affairs. He consistently sees stories within the Jewish world that deserve a wider audience, and stories within the wider world that the Jewish community ought to pay more attention to. That’s why we’re calling his column The Righteous Gentile.
Please join me in welcoming him — and wishing him a shana tova.”
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
Image
Google's Sergey Brin and Israel's Shimon Peres at Google

Jewish-owned search engine Google have been exposed by an ex-engineer who leaked nearly 1,000 pages of internal documents that show bias and censorship

A former Google engineer has released nearly 1,000 pages of documents that he says prove that the company, at least in some of its products, secretly boosts or demotes content based on what it deems to be true or false, while publicly claiming to be a neutral platform.

The software engineer, Zach Vorhies, first provided the documents to Project Veritas, a right-leaning investigative journalism nonprofit, as well as the Justice Department’s antitrust division, which has been investigating Google for potentially anti-competitive behavior.

“I thought that our election system is going to be compromised forever by this company that told the American public that it was not going to do any evil,” he told Project Veritas in a video published Aug. 14. “And I saw that they were making really quick moves. … They were intending to scope the information landscape so that they could create their own version of what was objectively true.”

Going public
Vorhies said he worked for Google for eight years, making $260,000 a year, when counting in the gains from the Google stock he owns. “I had every incentive in the world to stay at the company and just collect the paycheck,” he said, noting that most others would do that. “But I could never live with myself knowing that, if Google was able to implement the plans that they were planning, that I, at the moment of choice, backed out because I was selfish.”

...Vorhies called Google a “political machine”... He said there are other Google employees who “see what’s going on and they are really scared.”

Changes at the company that worried him started in 2016, he said.

The documents indicate that Google has ramped up emphasis on suppressing what it deems “fake news.” That has led it to review news content using a variety of manual and automated means to make calls on what is true and what is “misinformation” and sort results accordingly.

Most of the documents appear to pertain to Google News, an aggregator featured prominently at the top of the page for news-related search results.

Google News
One document describes “Project Purple Rain: Crisis Response & Escalation,” the goal of which is to establish “processes to detect and handle misinformation across products during crises” and “install 24/7 team of trained analysts ready to make policy calls and take actions across news surfaces including News, News 360 and Feed.”

“News” appears to pertain to “Google News” and “Feed,” a rebrand of the former “Google Now” product, showing news articles below the search bar on the Google mobile app.

'FRINGE RANKING'
...Combined with information from other documents, “fringe ranking” appears to mean that unless a user already knows what specifically to look for, Google will hide from the user anything it labels “fake news, hate speech, conspiracy theories, or science/medical/history denial.” Such information would then be effectively obscured from users who haven’t yet been exposed to it.

'HATE SPEECH'
Google, as well as other major tech companies, prohibit content they consider “hate speech”—itself a subjective standard impossible to enforce fairly, according to Nadine Strossen, a law professor and former president of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Google hasn’t responded to a request for comment.

Google has repeatedly denied political bias in its products. Vorhies suggested, though, that Google tries to present itself as a neutral platform to preserve legal protection under Section 230, which shields internet services from liability for user-generated content.

“Google is playing both sides of the game,” he said. “On the one hand, they’re saying they are a platform and that they are immune from being sued for the content that they host on their website. On the other hand, they’re acting as a publisher, in which they’re determining the editorial agenda of these certain companies, and they are applying that. If people don’t fall in line with their editorial agenda, then their news articles get deboosted and deranked. And if people do fall in line with their editorial agenda, it gets boosted and pushed to the top.”

Image

https://www.theepochtimes.com/google-en ... 42234.html
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
It isn't possible to understand the pseudo-historical narrative concerning European Jewry during WW2 without having an awareness of what it is that connects the network of people who created it, promulgated it, successfully enshrined it in the global consciousness over generations, and now have succeeded in making it a criminal offence to expose their deceitful machinations.

Many people in the last two centuries have understood and sought to make it understood by the masses, just who is pulling the strings and orchestrating this manipulation of the many international human constructs such as history, economics, banking, trade, politics, nation-states, wars, etc. I am referring to people such as Napoleon, Disraeli, Churchill (initially until he realised which side could be more beneficial to him personally), Henry Ford, Adolf Hitler, Oswald Mosely, the 5th Duke of Wellington, Solzhenitsyn, George Orwell, Roger Garaudy, David Duke, etc., etc. I have a whole topic thread on it here.
Christopher Bollyn and Jeff Gates are two recent messengers with the same exposé who have been active over the last one or two decades.

Here is a review of one of Gates' books.
Image

Guilt By Association is an initially confusing masterpiece almost too stuffed with evidence to concentrate on making clear its basic theme. But author Jeff Gates did so in a recent letter to a distinguished retired American diplomat: the research pivoted off the firsthand experience of John Doe whose experience spans 56 years of dealing with a trans-national criminal syndicate whose senior operatives share a common ideology in fundamental Judaism and a skill set experienced in displacing facts with beliefs.

Thus the common source of the fixed intelligence that took us to war in Iraq. And, thus the same network now being employed to expand this war to Iran.

From 1980 to 1987 Gates served as counsel to the Senate Finance Committee, working with Sen. Russell Long of Louisiana, son of the state's former Gov. Huey Long, who was assassinated at age 42 as he was preparing a presidential campaign. James Farley, postmaster general under President Franklin Roosevelt, had run a penny postcard poll confirming that if Huey Long actually ran for president, Roosevelt could not be re-elected. Fifty years later Russell Long remained convinced that Roosevelt's people [his Jewish handlers/advisers/paymasters] had killed his father. At a 2002 speech Gates gave in London, he met John Doe, related to one of the well-known people who had endorsed two of Gates earlier books. Soon afterward, Doe assured him that if Gates undertook the research and analysis the results of which appear in Guilt, the evidence would identify who killed Huey Long, and why. The facts Gates assembled point not to Roosevelt's people but to the syndicate identified in Guilt.

The future multi-volume Criminal State series will chronicle the operations of an international criminal syndicate as experienced by John Doe since his birth in 1952. Gates and Doe have worked together in Arizona for the past three years documenting the deeply criminal activities of the syndicate whose schemes encompass geo-political goals achieved through corruption and ruthlessness.

Because [continual] control of the Oval Office is the syndicate's goal, the immediate purpose of Guilt [was] to alert the public to the perils of John McCain emerging as president and commander-in-chief. McCain's election would embolden those skilled at displacing facts with deceit, Gates documents with convincing detail.

The brilliantly provocative Guilt by Association consists of nine chapters:
Game Theory and the Mass Murder of 9/11;
Organized Crime in Arizona;
John McCain and Financial Frauds;
McCain Family Secret: The Cover-Up;
The Presidency and Russian Organized Crime;
Money, Democracy and the Great Divide;
The New Anti-Semitism;
Would Obama Be Better?;
The Way Forward.

In the first chapter Gates illustrates the intergenerational sophistication with which neoconservatives prepared the minds of the American public to invade Iraq in response to 9/11. Academics and think tanks pushed Samuel Huntington's 1996 Clash of Civilizations to promote a clash consensus five years before 9/11.
That same year Richard Perle along with other neocons such as Douglas Feith wrote A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm for incoming Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. This helped lay more mental threads for removing Saddam Hussain.
Then Senators McCain, Joe Lieberman (a Jewish Zionist from Connecticut), and Jon Kyl (a Christian Zionist from Arizona), co-sponsored the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. Distracted by the Monica Lewinsky affair, President Bill Clinton signed it.

Four days after the destruction of the World Trade Towers, then Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz was urging President George W. Bush to invade Iraq. Not only was there was no evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, but there was no real connection between Saddam's secular regime and the deeply religious al-Qaeda.

At the same time, other Zionists from the U.S. Defence Department under Wolfowitz and — not so coincidentally — Feith were feeding false intelligence to the White House. The war would not be costly, according to Wolfowitz, and the entirely unnecessary and illegal war was launched.
In his chapter on John McCain and the Financial Frauds, Gates reviews McCain's unsavoury role in the Keating Five scandal.

The following chapter recounts the shameful role of McCain's father in helping to cover up Israel's deliberate attack on the USS Liberty during the 1967 Six-Day War in which 34 of the crew were killed and 294 wounded.
From a game theory perspective, Gates explains, by covering up the murder of Americans aboard the USS Liberty, a U.S. president (with the aid of Admiral John McCain, Jr.) confirmed that Israeli extremists could murder Americans without endangering U.S. support.

In the chapter on The Presidency and Russian Organized Crime, Gates describes a John McCain who was either ignorant about or complicit in Russian organized crime. During Boris Yeltsin s first term as president of Russia, a handful of oligarchs financially pillaged Russia. Six of the Big Seven oligarchs, whom Gates terms Ashkenazis, qualify for Israeli citizenship. McCain described Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the most infamous of Russia's corrupt oil oligarchs, as a political prisoner. Notes Gates: To claim Khodorkovsky as a political prisoner requires a closer look at how — at 32 years of age — a single Russian-Jewish-Ashkenazi citizen amassed state-owned assets worth more than $30 billion. Gates goes on to document the widespread criminality involved in Khodorkovsky's billions. To solve this systemic criminality, Gates explains, requires that a broad base of Americans understand how this fields-within-fields modus operandi operates unseen yet in plain sight, and how its operations progress, working through people whose profiled needs become the means for influencing their behaviour.

Guilt describes how Americans were induced to freely choose the very forces that endanger their freedom. Thus the role of those masterful at waging war by deception (the motto of the Israeli Mossad) by displacing facts with what the mark (i.e., the U.S.) could be deceived to believe: for example, that Iraq had nuclear weapons and mobile biological weapons laboratories and that the secular Saddam Hussein had ties with the fundamentalists of al-Qaeda.

Crafted as a wake-up call, the author documents how Tel Aviv wields control over U.S. foreign policy in an environment where lawmakers have been intimidated by the Israel lobby.
U.S. national security, Gates writes, requires a rejection of the self-deception that Israel operates as a trustworthy ally in an unstable region while ignoring its multi-decade role in provoking and sustaining instability. As Gates points out, the charge of anti-Semitism is used to misdirect and intimidate. As the criminality he documents becomes transparent, moderate Jews in fact are emerging as allies. The Zionist component which Gates convincingly portrays as ideology in the service of criminality has as its goal an extensive, Jews-only realm in an oil-rich region.

The facts confirm that Tel Aviv will never agree to peace with the Palestinians, as that would preclude their expansionist agenda for a Greater Israel. An oft-employed entropy strategy remains Israel's means to preclude settlement of the conflict. Indeed, Huntington's Clash of Civilizations is revealed as only the latest in a long series of manipulations each of which is designed to ensure a plausible evildoer. Meanwhile, fundamentalist Jews catalyze serial conflicts of opposites, while this trans-national criminal syndicate profits off the misery of both.
--Andrew I. Killgore (WRMEA Review)
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
Two, high-profile, 'Jewish', opinion-manipulators perpetuate Jewish myths and Jew-centric calculated deceits to the masses on mainstream media.

How did they get into such positions of influence?
Why is their opinion more worthy of TV air-time than a non-Jew's?
Should we be allowing such supremacist, racist, biased, pro-Israeli opinion to be broadcast?

Asking such questions is not permitted and will be punished as 'hate-speech' and 'anti-semitism'.

"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

.
Here is an article that gives yet another example of how Jews internationally act in unison to seek to control public opinion and awareness around the world.
The article deals only with how Jews who feel a loyalty to the übermensch land-theft in occupied Palestine are controlling content on Wikipedia concerning their Jewish lebensraum project.
It doesn't mention how they police and control the content of anything to do with Jews, jewish history, WW2, the Holocaust, National Socialism, conspiracies, 911, etc., etc.
How a small group of pro-Israel activists blacklisted MintPress on Wikipedia

For over ten years, right-leaning, pro-Israel groups have weaponised the online encyclopedia Wikipedia as a means of controlling the narrative of Israel’s over 50-year-long military occupation of Palestine.

by Whitney Webb

For over a decade, pro-Israel and ultra-nationalist Israeli settler groups have sought to weaponise the popular online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, through concerted covert editing campaigns, offering Wikipedia editing courses to West Bank settlers and even formal alliances between Israel and Wikipedia to allow Israelis to create and edit content in a variety of languages.

In recent years, this alliance between pro-Israel partisans and Wikipedia has stepped up, largely in response to the growth of the Boycott, Divest and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to pressure Israel to comply with international law with respect to occupied Palestine and the blockaded Gaza Strip. As a consequence, news outlets that consistently report on the success of BDS, such as MintPress News, have been targeted on Wikipedia by such partisans, who recently succeeded in blacklisting MintPress as a “reliable source” on the online encyclopedia.

In early June, a small number of partisan Wikipedia editors privately voted to blacklist MintPress News from use as a source on the online encyclopedia website at the behest of a Wikipedia editor who took issue with MintPress’ coverage of current events in Venezuela and Syria. At no point was MintPress ever asked to comment or allowed to respond to any of the allegations made and MintPress is unable to appeal the decision.

The involvement of pro-Israel partisans in the blacklisting of MintPress on Wikipedia is notable in light of the well-documented and unprecedented efforts of the Israeli government to promote the partisan editing of Wikipedia and to subsequently incorporate the online encyclopedia into its national educational curriculum.

The successful effort to blacklist MintPress News on Wikipedia began on June 1 and was initiated by Wikipedia user 'Jamesz42' a Wikipedia editor from Venezuela...

https://www.mintpressnews.com/pro-israe ... ia/261022/
For an analysis and exposé of the double-bluff misinformation tactics of people who believe themselves to be a part of what they call 'world jewry', here is a great article in the Unz review.

http://www.unz.com/ishamir/wiki-the-chaos-controlled/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 8206
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by Huntinger »

Google is International Juden. They also control and censor "YouTube" Shun der Jude; here is the reason why. From US News.Com
GOOGLE, INC., ISN'T just the world's biggest purveyor of information; it is also the world's biggest censor.

The company maintains at least nine different blacklists that impact our lives, generally without input or authority from any outside advisory group, industry association or government agency. Google is not the only company suppressing content on the internet. Reddit has frequently been accused of banning postings on specific topics, and a recent report suggests that Facebook has been deleting conservative news stories from its newsfeed, a practice that might have a significant effect on public opinion – even on voting. Google, though, is currently the biggest bully on the block.

When Google's employees or algorithms decide to block our access to information about a news item, political candidate or business, opinions and votes can shift, reputations can be ruined and businesses can crash and burn. Because online censorship is entirely unregulated at the moment, victims have little or no recourse when they have been harmed. Eventually, authorities will almost certainly have to step in, just as they did when credit bureaus were regulated in 1970. The alternative would be to allow a large corporation to wield an especially destructive kind of power that should be exercised with great restraint and should belong only to the public: the power to shame or exclude.

If Google were just another mom-and-pop shop with a sign saying "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone," that would be one thing. But as the golden gateway to all knowledge, Google has rapidly become an essential in people's lives – nearly as essential as air or water. We don't let public utilities make arbitrary and secretive decisions about denying people services; we shouldn't let Google do so either.

Die soziale Heimatpartei
𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

Here the courageous and righteous Israeli Jew Miko Peled talks about three myths that have been used to create and justify the genocidal zionist land-theft of Palestine into a Jew-only state. He talks about some of "the most powerful myths the world has ever known" that have been utilised by these racist zionists.

He misses one myth out...
Image

The history of Palestine, even its very recent history, has been all but forgotten. It was pushed out by a new version of history, a narrative that is based on faith and has very little to do with history.
One striking example is that of the 18th-century Palestinian leader and unifier, Daher Al-Umar. For most people, neither the man or the period in which he ruled Palestine is known.

Here is what Palestinian author Ibrahim Nasrallah writes about Daher Al-Umar:
Ibrahim Nasrallah wrote:“This matchless character has long been worthy of the attention of novelists and film and television producers, who could have made him a luminous part of our popular consciousness and the ongoing struggle of the people who populated and gave life to the land of Palestine”.
Time to remember
In his forward to The Lanterns of the King of Galilee, a historical novel based on the life of Daher Al-Umar published in 2011 in Arabic, and in English in 2014, Nasrallah writes, “What saddens me now is that I didn’t come to know this great man earlier in my life.” The man to which he is referring is Daher Al-Umar Al-Zaidani, also known as The King of Galilee, whose remarkable life spanned from 1689 to 1775.

Daher Al-Umar governed most of historic Palestine and shaped its economy and politics as well as the life of its inhabitants for the better part of the 18th century. He established ties – economic and political – with European empires and created a boost in the economy and lives of the people of Palestine that was unprecedented. Palestine, under Daher, was the closest thing to an independent state one could achieve in 18th century Levant.

I had only heard of Daher Al-Umar from reading Nasrallah’s book, which shows that Nasrallah is correct as he continues to say in his forward, “Unfortunately many people are ignorant of what Daher achieved toward establishing an autonomous Arab homeland in Palestine.” However, what is astonishing is that Nasrallah himself admits that he only came across the figure of Daher in 1985 while working on his epic novel, Time of White Horses, published in Arabic in 2007 and in English in 2012.

A challenging narrative
In his forward, Nasrallah doesn’t shy away from stating the obvious, that his homeland, the country which Daher unified and ruled, namely Palestine, “fell prey to the Zionist onslaught that wrested it from its owners by means of myths, tanks and collusion.”

One might add that these myths used by the Zionists were not just any myths, but perhaps the most powerful myths the world has ever known. In fact, even referring to these stories as “myth” will surely give rise to serious opposition as we are talking about none other than the Bible itself.

The Zionists based their claims to rights over Palestine using the toughest narrative to challenge. It is not one that is tough to challenge because it is rooted in historical facts, but because it is rooted in faith. In establishing their stake to Palestine, the Zionists built a foundation on three myths that operate as three pillars:
1. the myth of the Jewish people,
2. the myth of the homeland and
3. the myth of history,
and all three stem from the biblical narrative.

The myth of Jewish people claims that Jews are a nation like all nations, unified by a common language, history and country. This myth is in direct opposition to the way observant, orthodox Jewish people define themselves, which is as a people unified by a common faith and observance to the Almighty. This definition allows for Jewish people to be Arabs and speak Arabic, to be Polish and speak Polish or Yiddish or to be citizens of any other country in the world and still remain Jewish, as they had done for two millennia.

The myth of the homeland claims that Palestine is the homeland of the Jewish people and that it has been empty for thousands of years. This myth stands in contrast to the fact that Jews have a home and land wherever they reside, and Palestine is and always was inhabited and thriving.

The myth of that history involves the secularization of the Old Testament. It treats the Old Testament as a historical document that describes the history of the Jewish people. According to this myth, the Bible has historical value, even though centuries of research prove otherwise. Furthermore, this myth ignores the fact that the bible is not a history book but rather a book of faith with little significant historical foundation.

It is in the face of these challenging myths that opponents of Zionism and supporters of the rights of Palestinians have to struggle. It is in this context that knowing about Daher Al-Umar is so crucial, and one must ask, why and how a figure of such stature, influence and importance was erased from memory.

READ MORE HERE: https://www.mintpressnews.com/story-dah ... _ztCG5yWJ4
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 8206
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by Huntinger »

been-there wrote:
Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:27 am
Here the courageous and righteous Israeli Jew Miko Peled talks about three myths that have been used to create and justify the genocidal zionist land-theft of Palestine into a Jew-only state. He talks about some of "the most powerful myths the world has ever known" that have been utilised by these racist zionists.

He misses one myth out...
I suspect the Khazar hypothesis for ashkenazi to be accurate due to recent genetic analysis of various haploid groups. They have no claim to Palestine having accepted Judaism many years ago with no racial or genetic links to the early Israelites.

Die soziale Heimatpartei
𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9634
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there »

France caves in to internal AND international Jewish pressure to outlaw criticism of their racist, zionist, genocidal, land-thieving, white-colonialist-settler, 'Jewish state' in the Middle East...
French Parliament adopts anti-semitism definition that includes anti-Zionism

Despite protest by prominent Jewish and Israeli scholars, the French parliament passed on Tuesday a resolution on anti-Semitism that adopts a definition of the term which also includes anti-Zionism.

Dec 03, 2019

https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/euro ... -1.8219304
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests