Quote for the day:

The RODOH Lounge is a place for general discussion, preferably non-Holocaust. The Lounge is only lightly moderated but please keep this a friendly place to chat with and get to know your fellow board participants.
Turnagain
Posts: 8350
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Quote for the day:

Post by Turnagain »

Of course that applies only to the Nazis and other goyim pieces of shit. Here is what Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson has to say about Jews and equality.
"The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: 'Let us differentiate.' Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of 'let us differentiate' between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world."
The Old Rabbi (a pseudonym for one of the holy Lubavitch rabbis) explained that the passage in Chapter 49 of Hatanya [the basic book of Chabad]:
"And you have chosen us" [the Jews] means specifically that the Jewish body was chosen [by God], because a choice is thus made between outwardly similar things. The Jewish body "looks as if it were in substance similar to bodies of non-Jews,' but the meaning ... is that the bodies only seem to be similar in material substance, outward look and superficial quality. The difference of the inner quality, however, is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species.
Norman Cantor, a New York University professor declared:
"The genetic superiority of the Jews will be extended and as long as its carriers are individually free and privileged to pursue their interests in science, philosophy, literature and the arts, highly advantageous consequences for humanity will follow."
These are not the self-obsessed ravings of a lunatic fringe element a hundred years ago, but those of a prominent Jewish professor today who gives current voice to an old strand of Jewish ideology in a book by a major publisher, HarperCollins. So much for Jew equality.


Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!


The Jewish Man
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 11:37 am
Contact:

Re: Quote for the day:

Post by The Jewish Man »

“If you are a denier, get on the right side of history and stop being so gullible. Remember, it has been historically and scientifically proven, in a court of law no less, that more than 1.2 million Jews, along with 20,000 gypsies and tens of thousands of Polish and Russian political prisoners, were killed at Auschwitz alone. Beyond that, Yad Vashem’s Central Database of Shoah Victims’ Names has collected 4.5 million Jewish victims’ names (and counting) from various archival sources. How much more evidence could you possibly want?

Holocaust deniers will always come up with pathetic lies and red herrings aimed at deceiving and leading the gullible astray. Be it death toll anomalies, gas chamber debates, criticizing Holocaust denial laws, repeating the ancient myth that the “Joooz control the world,” blaming Israel, claiming Anne Frank’s diary is fabricated etc…etc…yada…yada…yawn…the list goes on. Why do the deniers persist? Because they have an agenda – and it isn't a nice agenda.”

- James Morcan, Debunking Holocaust Denial Theories

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 7662
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Quote for the day:

Post by Huntinger »

The Jewish Man wrote:
Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:27 am
claiming Anne Frank’s diary is fabricated etc…etc…yada…yada…yawn…the list goes on.
Anne Frank, legally, did not write The Diary of Anne Frank by herself. The Anne Frank Foundation—which owns the diary’s copyright—now claims that Otto Frank, Anne’s father who edited the diary after his daughter’s death, is a co-author.
"Why do the deniers persist? Because they have an agenda – and it isn't a nice agenda.”
Since when is the quest for the truth an agenda? Only those who perpetrate a hoax wish for it to remain hidden.


𝕴𝖈𝖍 𝖇𝖊𝖗𝖊𝖚𝖊 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙𝖘...𝕾𝖔𝖟𝖎𝖆𝖑 𝖌𝖊𝖍𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖗 𝕹𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖑

Amt IV

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9368
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: Quote for the day:

Post by been-there »

.

“Honesty is more than not lying.
It is truth telling, truth speaking,
truth living and truth loving.”


“I’m for truth, no matter who tells it.
I’m for justice,
no matter who it’s for or against.”




The Jewish Man
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 11:37 am
Contact:

Re: Quote for the day:

Post by The Jewish Man »

been-there wrote:
Mon Jun 22, 2020 2:58 pm
.

“Honesty is more than not lying.
It is truth telling, truth speaking,
truth living and truth loving.”


“I’m for truth, no matter who tells it.
I’m for justice,
no matter who it’s for or against.”



Why are you such a lying sack of shit then?

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9368
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: Quote for the day:

Post by been-there »

.
You can correct millions of honest people
with one empirically proven fact

but you can't correct even one
self-deluded, dishonest, stubborn person
not even with many millions of empirically proven facts.

.

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9368
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: Quote for the day:

Post by been-there »

Image

Bertrand Russell concerning the role of the Police

"There is one matter in which many democracies have been unsuccessful, and that is the control of the police. Given a police force which is corrupt and unscrupulous, and judges who are not anxious to discover its crimes, it is possible for ordinary citizens to find themselves at the mercy of a powerful organization which, just because it is supposed to enforce the law, has exceptional facilities for acting illegally. I think this is a danger which is much too little realized in many countries."

― Bertrand Russell,
‘What is democracy? a background book’ Published 1953. Reprinted 1961, pp. 78-110

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests