George Zimmerman found innocent

The RODOH Lounge is a place for general discussion, preferably non-Holocaust. The Lounge is only lightly moderated but please keep this a friendly place to chat with and get to know your fellow board participants.
User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9363
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by been-there »

Charles Traynor wrote:
Tue Jun 23, 2020 10:01 pm
I know the sight of a red tunic may reduce some here to quivering wrecks, but what the hell...
Image
Is this at the Battle of Isandhlwana where Zulus killed over 1,000 British men, who they caught far from home? ;)

The boys in red were only there as they had been ordered by an imperialist elite to act as foreign invaders in another people's land for a pittance. Meanwhile their wives and children were probably living in poverty and squalor back in blighty.

You might not be thinking of Isandhlwana as it happened on the same day as Rorke's drift. :ugeek:
For some reason, certain people prefer to not know about the full picture of events that day January 22nd 1879.
The battle of Isandlwana stunned the western imperialist world as it was considered unthinkable that a ‘native’ army armed substantially with stabbing weapons could defeat modern well-equipped troops of a western power armed with modern rifles and artillery, let alone wipe it out.

You appear to want to glorify the sacrifice of the British lower classes who died for the selfish interests of a wealthy elite. I instead want to understand history without it being clouded by jingoistic patriotism that presents military invasion and oppression as something glorious.

Especially when the whole reason Britain has had an influx of the very people you harbour a racist aversion to is PRECISELY because of the centuries of British imperialist conquest.
Why do you think 'native' people from the ex-British Empire were granted British citizenship? People from Uganda, Rodesia/Zimbabwe, the West Indies, the Caribbean, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, etc?

Who profited? Who benefited?
...the opposition in England is really always the same, for on all essential matters in which the opposition has to make itself felt, the parties are always in agreement. They have one and the same conviction and through the medium of the press, mould public opinion along corresponding lines.
One might well believe that in these countries of liberty and riches, the people must possess an unlimited degree of prosperity. But no! On the contrary, it is precisely in these countries that the distress of the masses is greater than anywhere else. Such is the case in 'rich Britain'.

She controls sixteen million square miles. In India, for example, a hundred million colonial workers with a wretched standard of living must labour for her. One might think, perhaps, that at least in England itself every person must have his share of these riches. By no means! In that country class distinction is the crassest imaginable. There is poverty - incredible poverty - on the one side, and equally incredible wealth on the other. They have not solved a single problem. The workmen of that country which possesses more than one-sixth of the globe and of the world's natural resources dwell in misery, and the masses of the people are poorly clad.. In a country which ought to have more than enough bread and every sort of fruit, we find millions of the lower classes who have not even enough to fill their stomachs, and go about hungry. A nation which could provide work for the whole world must acknowledge the fact that it cannot even abolish unemployment at home. For decades this rich Britain has had two and a half million unemployed;

I wish to put before you a few basic facts: The first is that in the capitalistic democratic world the most important principle of economy is that the people exist for trade and industry, and that these in turn exist for capital. We have reversed this principle by making capital exist for trade and industry, and trade and industry exist for the people. In other words, the people come first. Everything else is but a means to this end. When an economic system is not capable of feeding and clothing a people, then it is bad, regardless of whether a few hundred people say: 'As far as I am concerned it is good, excellent; my dividends are splendid.'

However, the dividends do not interest me at all. Here we have drawn the line. They may then retort: 'Well, look here, that is just what we mean. You jeopardize liberty.'

Yes, certainly, we jeopardize the liberty to profiteer at the expense of the community, and, if necessary, we even abolish it. British capitalists, to mention only one instance, can pocket dividends of 76, 80, 95, 140, and even 160 per cent from their armament industry.

They can see exactly how our nation has been reconstructed. You see it clearly. For instance, there we see a state ruled by a numerically small upper class. They send their sons to their own schools, to Eton. We have Adolf Hitler schools or national political educational establishments. On the one hand, the sons of plutocrats, financial magnates; on the other, the children of the people. Etonians and Harrovians exclusively in leading positions over there; in this country, men of the people in charge of the State.

~~ Adolf Hitler's Speech to the Workers of Berlin — 10th December 1940
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous


Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!


User avatar
torus9
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2018 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by torus9 »

"Let me be clear, all White people are currently under serious assault, but I am just focusing on how White girls and women are being targeted in this piece. The videos you will see are appalling and heartbreaking. Perhaps the White females are being attacked by blacks due to issues of jealousy or maybe it is just pure racial hatred. Whatever the reason is, it apparent that these attacks are unprovoked. Oftentimes it is a whole gang that engages in the attack or at least cheers on as the victim is brutalized."

https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=209178

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9363
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by been-there »

torus9 wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2020 12:37 am
"Let me be clear, all White people are currently under serious assault, but I am just focusing on how White girls and women are being targeted in this piece. The videos you will see are appalling and heartbreaking. Perhaps the White females are being attacked by blacks due to issues of jealousy or maybe it is just pure racial hatred. Whatever the reason is, it apparent that these attacks are unprovoked. Oftentimes it is a whole gang that engages in the attack or at least cheers on as the victim is brutalized."

https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=209178
You apear to me to be like people coming into a cinema two hours after the beginning of a three hour film and watching ten minutes, and then pontificating about the injustice of what you saw in that ten minute piece.

We have to see the whole!
And we have to take into consideration what came before to understand all parts of the story.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 2373
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 am
Location: USA, West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by Scott »

been-there wrote:
Mon Jun 22, 2020 11:24 pm

Er... is any of this getting through?

Cops are there to 'protect and serve' the whole community. Not just the white community. Not just people without a criminal record.


Right, which is why calls to de-fund the police and destroy the public-sector Unions that might defend them really means that the burden will be filled by private police forces like the Shomrin, the security that the Jews use in New York that will brutally screw with PoC or any Goys who act-up in their neighborhoods. This kind of private police brutality, however, will likely not be getting any negative fanfare from the Lügenpresse.

been-there wrote:
Mon Jun 22, 2020 11:24 pm

If cops believe afro-americans are statistically more prone to criminality, therefore more worthy of suspicion, and therefore they are more justified in being trigger happy and brutal against ALL Afro-americans, then you have a problem.


Cops don't "believe" anything. They work for the political regime in power like the squirrelly Jewish mayor of Minneapolis.

The important thing is that White people LEARN that the police will not defend them and that calling the police on a misbehaving Nïgger is equivalent to stringing them up from trees.

The outrage porn is meant to intimidate White people, especially if they ever have to defend themselves.

And overseas it is meant to sound the alarm that the Great Satan of Trump's America is out of control and run by dumb inbred Rednecks who are sorely in need of Multikulti enlightenment, and that it is not in reality the chickens of elitist globalism coming home to roost. If it were woke-Capital propaganda scripted as the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" it could not have been plotted better:

You see, it is ALWAYS Whitey's fault when Nïggers misbehave.

been-there wrote:
Mon Jun 22, 2020 11:24 pm

And you had better start dealing with it, not denying it.


The facts are that Blacks are the LEAST likely to be shot by police.

And this, considering their frequent brushes with the law, is quite remarkable.

This fact, born out by countless statistics, has been pointed out over and over again on this very thread.

The contrary claim─that Blacks are somehow in DANGER from the police in the United States─is the phony narrative of the Lügenpresse, and these Jews KNOW that it is FALSE.

been-there wrote:
Mon Jun 22, 2020 11:24 pm

If you think the way to deal with it is to come down EVEN HARDER on ALL afro-americans, don't be surprised if there is a violent blow-back on ALL whites. You have chosen that.


Crackdown on PoC thugs is exactly what is needed but that is EXACTLY what we don't get and what we won't get. This is ENTIRELY BY DESIGN.

A White guy in the Brooks case would have been given the breathalyzer and arrested as soon as he was encountered by police. They would not have danced around trying to gin-up some probable cause to investigate this Black buck for driving drunk.

Then, in spite of clearly failing the field-sobriety testing, the police in the Brooks case took 41 minutes getting around to why they had probable cause to even be questioning him.

Once it unrelentingly became obvious that Brooks was going to have to be arrested for DUI─and they surely knew by then that he had multiple priors which would make him a possible resister─these rookies were THEN caught by surprise.

Been-There, you seem to not understand how policing works, and especially "broken windows" law enforcement.

The cops doing routine checks on papers and running in people from routine traffic stops for outstanding warrants─what is often called a Dragnet─is one of their fundamental law-enforcement tools.

Blacks don't like this because 1) they are always up to something, and 2) they are incapable of keeping their shit together so they get brought in for the stupidest stuff, time and time again.

When a cop politely pulls them over for anything, large or small, and then asks for their driver's license, registration, and proof of insurance, what the Nïgger hears instead is this:

"Yo Niggah! How you can afford this big-ass car and that White Ho?"

In reality, the White cop could give a crap about how much money Bubba Wallace makes driving NASCAR, and he probably could care less about the tattooed White skank along with the Black man's ride.

The seasoned cop simply knows that when he does his job and calls in the report the odds are that outstanding warrants will come pouring out. That is his empirical experience talking, not his prejudice.

The Jewish-owned media on the other hand deliberately reinforces the phony narrative that the police are targeting the Blacks and trying to keeel them. Jews have long used Blacks as a cudgel to beat Whitey with.


Racism is when Whites advocate for their own interests. There is no need to overthink it.


People like Fritz Berg─who was a disaffected Kennedy Democrat who believed in the Civil Rights Kool-Aid and that the Mossad must have killed the Kennedys, was also stuck in the mentality of the Cold War three decades after the end of the Cold War.

Fritz just never could accept the fact that the term Racist was meaningless because while he understood that Jews were the MOST racist of all, and how they had treated the Germans, the coinage of the new realm could never be spent against non-Whites or used to criticize Jews. Racism is the Jewish social CONSTRUCT that is used to neuter White solidarity. Jews don't love Blacks any more than any other Redneck does.

Why is this so difficult to understand? There is no war against Negroes in the USA. If anything they are INDULGED TO EXCESS by the system, and they are ONLY in danger from other Negro criminals.

Calling Jews to account for their lies and for their hypocrisy is what makes one a Nazi or an anti-Semite. I am willing to discuss the issues of the Holocaust and to debate these concepts with them in good faith and as a point of fair play.

But there is no point in playing by the rules of the enemy that will never be applied honestly. if you are worried about being dubbed RACIST because you are White and are not a wan admirer of rank Negro criminality, then you have played a rigged game that you have already lost.

:)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.”
~ Major General J.F.C. Fuller,
historian – England

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 3079
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by Charles Traynor »

been-there wrote:
Tue Jun 23, 2020 11:03 pm


You appear to want to glorify the sacrifice of the British lower classes who died for the selfish interests of a wealthy elite. I instead want to understand history without it being clouded by jingoistic patriotism that presents military invasion and oppression as something glorious.
I am well aware of who profited from the empire and have spoken about it on this forum several times in the past. That mildly amusing meme was aimed at the White whores and fat estro-boys currently taking the knee and bowing before violent black criminals.

Would you, or have you already taken the knee, or as Peter Hitchens more accurately labels it: "take the buttock"?

I think what you are failing to understand is that the sub-Saharan African is the most base and savage of all the human races. In truth it is totally fair and reasonable to classify them as sub-human. Jogger genetics make it impossible for them to live in civilized non-African countries with human cultural standards they can never ever meet. The Jew and liberal agenda of flooding formally White nations with blacks is in fact cruelty to animals. All blacks need to be deported to Africa immediately and be allowed to live in the wild as nature intended.



Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image
https://dailystormer.su/watch-teens-pos ... n-seattle/
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 3079
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by Charles Traynor »

Image
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 3079
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by Charles Traynor »

Rumours have been circulating for some time that the White bitch seen setting fire to the Atlanta Wendy’s was in fact the girlfriend of Rayshard Brooks. Well it is now confirmed Natalie White, 29, was his girlfriend.

Image

The Jew media are portraying the martyred Rayshard as a loving family man when in fact he was a child beating cheat who fucked fat White sluts.


The woman arrested for burning down an Atlanta Wendy’s as retribution for the police killing of Rayshard Brooks was his “girlfriend,” her lawyer confirmed Tuesday.

Brooks referred to Natalie White, 29, as his “girlfriend” during the June 12 traffic stop that preceded his death, bodycam footage shows.

White turned herself in Tuesday after a warrant was issued for her arrest.

“[White and Brooks] were close friends,” her attorney, Drew Findling, told The Post, confirming that she was the woman Brooks referred to in the bodycam video.

Brooks was married to Tomika Miller.
https://dailystormer.su/white-bitch-who ... shards-gf/
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9363
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by been-there »

Whatever. When cops break the law, kill citizens and then gang together to lie about it to get off, you have a problem.
I still suggest that people put aside their racial prejudices to acknowledge that.

When cops feel they can murder (unlawfully kill) afro-Americans in public, in daylight, when they know there have been increasingly riotous protests by BLM movement against that, AND when they KNOW they are being filmed doing it, AND when witnesses are telling them 'you are killing that guy' but they continue killing him anyway, KNOW you have really, really, deeply ingrained problems with your law enforcement operatives.

And when those cops are trained in those dangerous, potentially lethal techniques by racist, apartheid, übermensch, Israeli, Jewish militias who test their murderous techniques on people they regard as cockroach-untermensch — yet you and your government think that is not relevant — KNOW that not only do you have big problems but you yourself have unwittingly become a part of your own huge problem.

For arguing like this I was just accused here of being someone who hates his own race and wants genocide for it.
I regard that as a ludicrous calumny.

I just went to my nearest town around 16:00 to buy two cycle tyres and an inner tube for my youngest child's bike. Around 85% of the people I saw there appeared to be (and sounded like) recent immigrants of middle eastern or african ethnicity.
I have mentioned this before here.

The indigenous population and its culture of where I live is slowly being compromised if not eliminated. And the indigenous people here have been so conditioned to believe that this is a good thing, that many applaud it and virtue signal their approval of it on social media and in work tea-breaks.
I've also related this before.

People have been subtly conditioned to welcome the deliberate eradication of their race and their culture to create a multi-cultural Europe. I again suggest people who don't want that should get wise to who is behind that campaign AND they should investigate WHY they are behind it!

In England the whole process is perhaps twenty-years ahead and is probably irreversible.

But here is the thing I would like people to consider and take on board: those immigrants themselves are not to be blamed, nor hated. They individually are just pawns in the game. Unwitting pawns who just want to carve out a higher standard of living for themselves and their loved ones. Exactly as WE would if we were in their position.
In Europe we need to understand who is behind it and why. Then only would it be possible to do something about it.

Just hating the effect while ignoring the cause is exactly the mistake Werd makes. And it's a mistake that the instigators are happy for people to make. It suits their agenda!!


As for the Boer War and those working-class men used as cannon-fodder ('spear-feed'?), who DID profit?
Who DID instigate all that and benefit from the slaughter?
Not the British soldiers.
And certainly not the Zulus trying to protect THEIR way of life and homeland.
I suggest people look a bit further back instead of just analysing and reacting to the events of the last few decades. Try and see the bigger picture.

So, the Boer War. It was perceived at the time that people who could fairly be described as International Jewry (i.e. Jews of no particlular national identity or allegiance) had had a hand in the cause of the Boer War for financial gain:
In 2002 several compilations were published to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Boer War of 1899–1902. The intention of the authors of these studies was to go beyond standard conceptualisations of the war by placing it in a wider context of globalisation – an orientation which is illustrated for example by the compilation entitled Writing a Wider War.
They felt that previous conceptualisations did not take account of new research perspectives on, for example, race, gender and identity.

Hobson also placed the war in the wider context of capitalism and Imperialism.
He claimed that the Boer War was brought about through the influence of the gold-mining magnates of the Rand in their search for increased profits. Hobson’s view on the causes of the war was a basis for the first theoretical analysis of the role of capitalists in Imperialism.
Being a matter of real significance for the Empire as well as for South Africa, the war offered Hobson an opportunity to study the origins, participants and consequences of Imperialism.
-- 'Hobson’s Imperialism: a study in late-Victorian political thought' by Timo
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 3079
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by Charles Traynor »

Image
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 7615
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: George Zimmerman found innocent

Post by Huntinger »

Irish Lives Matter
Indentured servants were men and women who signed a contract (also known as an indenture or a covenant) by which they agreed to work for a certain number of years in exchange for transportation to Virginia and, once they arrived, food, clothing, and shelter.
Blacks were not the only slaves. The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World. The King James I Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.
Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.
Image
From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.
During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.
Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.
There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.
But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.
Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.
Image


𝕴𝖈𝖍 𝖇𝖊𝖗𝖊𝖚𝖊 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙𝖘...𝕾𝖔𝖟𝖎𝖆𝖑 𝖌𝖊𝖍𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖗 𝕹𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖑

Amt IV

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests