Werd wrote: ↑
Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:36 am
been-there wrote: ↑
Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:55 pm
As just explained in a cartoon and a written explanation, defunding
the police does not mean abolishing
Last time I checked, police needed money via taxes to pay for uniforms, guns, tazers, cars, radios, computers, evidence storage units, salaries...
1. What are they getting too much money for?
2. what are they going to have to go without or have less of and why is it acceptable and not going to interfere with the performance of their duties?
3. How will that stop racism? Like some racist cop will go, "Oh we're losing supplies or our salaries are going down. I guess I better stop using the N word."
4. Why can't we take money away from funding Israel for one or two years in America instead?
5. And why didn't been-there, the noted anti-Zionist think of that before I did?
Regressive liberals talk a good game and use big words to impress in order to extricate themselves from having to actually explain what they mean and provide any meaningful details. It's a good trick. Conservative scumbags like to filibuster all the time in government. Liberals do it in the press.
The first three questions were not answered by been-there OR the link he provided. So I will have to do my best at guessing.
Instead of paying for such things as extensive officer overtime and expensive military equipment, cities should reallocate that money to a city’s social services, such as mental health, education, and housing.
So don't pay officers overtime? Gee, how fucking nice. Yeah, that'll really make people want to be cops to stop the crime.
By increasing funding for these other services, activists maintain that a city can more safely, effectively, and properly address underlying problems that lead to the very crime and violence the police are tasked with addressing—and which has persistently resulted in the use of force against Black people.
"Don't commit crimes. Don't resist arrest." - liberal Democrat youtuber atheism-is-unstoppable
Why don't we ask blacks if they want less cops or a more impotent police force? Apparently a lot of them don't.
In other words, fund a social worker, teacher, job or money coach, or health professional to help a person before their challenges lead to a moment of crisis that requires a police officer.
What the fuck does this babbling bullshit even mean? One example please.
Defunding the police, the thinking goes, will help break cycles of violence.
How about don't commit crimes and don't resist arrest? How about that? How about we hold blacks accountable for their shitty family life that plague so much of the community? I already addressed that and been-there skipped RIGHT OVER IT. So here it is again:
Werd wrote: ↑
Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:42 am
been-there wrote: ↑
Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:17 am
By increasing funding for these other services, activists maintain that a city can more safely, effectively, and properly address underlying problems that lead to the very crime and violence the police are tasked with addressing — and which has persistently resulted in the use of force against Black people.
And just like a liberal, you REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE why the black communities ARE TRULY fucked up the way they are.
Too many black women pumping out kids with different daddies who are absentee fathers and creating too many children that LACK PROPER MALE ROLE MODELS. WHY ARE BLACK WOMEN BEING FINANCIALLY REWARDED WITH WELFARE FOR CREATING FATHERLESS HOMES WHICH ARE DAMAGING TO YOUNG BOYS? Push abortion and perhaps incentive based eugenics as comedian Doug Stanhope suggested. A form of soft population control if blacks can't stop fucking without a proper marriage and stable two parent household. FINANCIALLY REWARD ABORTION AND TYING ONE'S TUBES, NOT RECKLESS CHILDBIRTH!
That's just part of the post. Notice the been-there quote tag in there. So he got a notification of this post of mine. He ignored it. Why? because it attempts to hold blacks accountable for the shit they DO do. Something been-there is not interested in because he thinks that the rest of my post, which shows conspiratorial plots against blacks, THEREFORE absolves blacks of rational decision making and their horrible fucked up family lives without stable fathers. Sorry. Easily obtainable welfare and pushing girl power and single motherhood as the best model have nothing to do with CIA planted cocaine on the streets. Women can close their legs and get abortions. No sympathy for how they're breeding like rabbits without good daddies.
Werd wrote: ↑
Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:42 am
here is ANOTHER ASPECT that liberals don't acknowledge. Mainly due to ignorance:
Illegal drugs, guns and ammo. ALL BROUGHT IN BY THE CIA FROM FOREIGN LANDS, GIVEN TO CORRUPT FREEMASONIC COPS TO DISTRIBUTE AMONG BLACK GANG LEADERS WHO GET INITIATED IN WHITE LODGES AND TOLD KEEP THIS SHIT IN YOUR NEIGHBOURHOODS OR YOU'RE GOING TO JAIL AND WE'LL STOP LOOKING THE OTHER WAY!
Wait a minute? Me looking at the problems in the black community and not blaming genetics and calling them animals or inferior? Me blaming outside white forces? That's interesting. I guess I AM a liberal and a non-racist despite many past false accusations from people like Nessie, Montgomery2 and been-there.
Until people study up
on how drugs move, who moves them and what interlocking centuries old bloodlines that participate in this and still do to this day via corruption in media, military, transportation, justice system, masonry, the ROOT OF THE PROBLEM IS NEVER GOING TO BE TRULY EXPOSED! People who slag this stuff off as "conspiracy nonsense" and don't give it a second look and do everything they can to discourage looking into this stuff actually cause harm to the black community.
Been-there hates people who talk common sense because they constantly show him up. ESPECIALLY if they he is getting checked by someone in his own liberal camp.
The Minneapolis City Council concluded that the city’s police force had such a pattern of racism it needed to build a new policing system from the bottom up rather than change its existing one from within. While the council has not yet submitted specific plans, it is looking into what is largely referred to as community-led policing and public safety, which involves a closer partnership between the police and the public it oversees.
George Floyd aside, don't commit crimes. Don't resist arrest. 13/50.
Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine dating back to a 1967 Supreme Court case. It is meant to protect government officials from lawsuits alleging they violated someone’s rights when performing their duties in a reasonable manner.
This immunity is qualified—that is, “restricted, limited,” not absolute—because a government official can still be held personally liable if it’s determined that they violated clearly established rights.
Since the early 2000s, many critics of qualified immunity feel it has been abused to shield police officers from accountability for the use of excessive force. That is, qualified immunity has wrongly given police officers impunity, “exemption from punishment,” critics argue.
Since this is case law, how the fuck does defunding police over-write this? IT DOESN'T! Again, this ties into those first 3 questions I asked that been-there dodged on purpose. If you want to eliminate qualified immunity, TAKE IT TO CONGRESS AND PUSH THE POLITICIANS TO GET RID OF IT. DON'T TAKE MONEY AWAY FROM COPS WHO NEED RESOURCES TO COMBAT RIOTERS IN THE STREETS! HOW DOES TAKING AWAY RESOURCES PREVENT COPS FROM STILL USING A LAW THAT IS ON THE BOOKS??? IT DOESN'T! IT'S STILL THERE NO MATTER HOW MANY OF A BUDGET CITY POLICE GET!
This is what I mean, when I saw there is a lack of common sense among a lot of 21st century liberals that don't understand basic 80's and 90's common sense. I often hate that I have so many liberal tendencies because it puts me in the same camp as the regressive idiots.
Now I don't usually cite gay furries who are comedians, but DAMN, this makes sense!