been-there wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:02 amHa ha ha!Scott wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:18 pm
...If you want to see how this would play out, just watch one of the documentary films on the 1992 Rodney King riots in Los Angeles, and imagine this put on a global scale.
Essentially, Negroes cannot be disciplined by White Police or White Judges and White Juries because "Rayciss an' Shiite."
But without social discipline of some sort, you cannot have a Nation-State in any sense...
And I was admiring the logic up until this point.
Police officers are not there to personally “discipline” citizens who break the law. They are there to arrest them and allow a court to do the disciplining.
You really didn't know that?
Has your racist prejudice blinded you so much?
Ask yourself this: if you or one of your white loved ones broke the law, would you be ok with a group of black police officers surrounding them and beating them up with clubs and kicking them in what was legally decided was an "unlawful assault" and "use of excessive force"?
But that is not what happened. Negroes can't admit this because they Dindu Nuffin' and because Liberals tell them this, which (no surprise) gets them into trouble, and Shït-Libs sometimes even fetishize People-of-Color as if this were all a Jack London novel.
Rodney King led the cops on a high-speed chase in his little car while drunk as a skunk. When the police apprehended him he would NOT (or could not) obey commands and continued to resist arrest even after being Tased. He kept trying to get back up and got roughed up a bit in the process but not maliciously.
The important thing is that a jury in a more respectable venue found the officers not-guilty except for a minor charge. There was no Civil Rights issue on Race here because RK's Negro passengers were not even arrested by the police, let alone manhandled.
We have judges and juries to adjudicate these things, not grainy videotape and pinkos in the mass-media and the city's first Black mayor indignantly inciting muh Negroes with dumb shït that they are stupid enough to believe.
I just watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix about the Rodney King incident and the 1992 L.A. Riots. It was done from a Liberal point of view trying to make the case for systemic White racism in Los Angeles, but (to its credit) it mostly did not gloss over the facts, and they are damning to the Liberal narrative.
Mostly the blame was laid on Police Chief Gates for not responding with sufficient diatribe against police brutality, and then not suppressing the riot forcefully enough so that Negro property owners and the Korean shop owners got hurt by the rampaging Blacks. The police stood down when they should have opened up. Then the National Guard lollygagged while they were "waiting on ammunition." The documentary did not spare the many brutal scenes videotaped of what these swarthy denizens of "Resistance" did during their chimp-out.
The documentary was very interesting and right at the start I expected it to be slanted, and it did not disappoint. It began with the notion that the 1965 L.A. Watts rioting was in response to oppression too. They were playing 1965 police dispatch tapes of officers calling in the first accounts of incidents. In the closed captioning the police used language like this: "several male Niggers, approximately 20's reported attacking and beating motorists, location ... " And there were at least five calls like that.
The only thing is that in NOT ONE of these 1965 police dispatch tapes did police actually use the word "Niggers." As you can clearly hear, it was always "Negroes." That was the polite term for Nïggers back in 1965. But it illustrates the slant in the documentary here. Nïggers think (and are so told) that when and if they hear the N-word, they are "entitled" thusly to do anything they want.
There is a very funny prank video on YouTube where some hipster walks around the concrete zoo and says stuff like "Hey Neighbor" when he sees Darkies in da 'Hood. They invariably hear "Hey Nigger" and start their mini chimp-out routine. He has rented an apartment next door and has to explain that he is their new neighbor before he be necklaced (or something).
Even today, when you stop or pull over a Negro for a traffic violation or questioning, you might as well be putting them onto the slave ship. They are TOLD to chimp-out, and with little provocation they do not disappoint. The police know this, of course, and this friction has to be built into law enforcement procedures from the start. Unless you display overwhelming force, i.e., multiple police cars and sometimes K-9 units (police dogs), there will be problems.
The idea that police are gunning down Nïggers is an ABSOLUTE LIE. Whites and Hispanics are far more likely to be gunned down for resisting arrest than Blacks when you statistically normalize the data. That is a pretty remarkable fact for a supposedly Rayciss society where the "color" of crime is overwhelmingly African, even though they are a comparatively small minority. The data is even worse for non-Whites if you can disaggregate Hispanics generally from "Whites."
Part of the buildup to the Rodney King riot was on March 16, 1991 when a young Negress, fifteen-year-old Latasha Harlins was challenged by Soon Ja Du, an elderly Korean liquor store owner who was filling in for her husband on a break--and who was obviously familiar with Black liquor store modus operandi. Mrs. Du asked to see inside Latasha's bag or something like that. A lot of shoplifters put stuff (in this case some orange juice) in their bags and then hold some money in their hand to make it look like they "intended" to pay if they are observed or challenged.
This request to look in the bag elicited a big chimp-out that resulted in the Korean lady getting a black eye from three punches and being knocked down. The Korean lady shot the Negress in the back of the head while fleeing, killing her. The Harlins-death came 13 days after the videotaped beating of Rodney King and this certainly influenced the Du murder trial. During the trial the Korean store owned by Du was struck by an arson attack.
Soon Ja Du was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The sentence imposed by the White judge, Joyce Karlin said that Soon Ja Du was not a criminal and fined her $500 plus 400 hours of community service with five years of probation, but no jail time.
The "community Negroes" wanted a fifteen-year sentence and nearly went postal, and the cucky L.A. County Prosecutor's office attempted to censure the judge and disqualify her from trying any violent felony cases, but Judge Karlin was reelected to California Superior Court in early 1992.
A state appeals court later unanimously upheld Judge Karlin's sentencing decision in April 1992, a week before the L.A. riots.
The Los Angeles mayor's office estimated that 65 percent of all businesses vandalized during the riots were Korean-owned, and the Du's store was burned down as well.
Negroes have no shame. If they were justly imprisoned and executed fairly for the crimes THAT THEY DO, then it would be considered racist by definition and would simply not be politically possible.
Thus in a semi-functional society, i.e, one where the people who make the trains run on time and the toilets flush and are at least not outnumbered too much, then some forms of social discipline would still be possible multi-racially. But because Whites are too pathologically altruistic to apply justice with decisiveness and occasional ruthlessness, this cannot happen politically and our cuckholdry is our own fault.
Those who would benefit from a tough hand the most are the Blacks, ironically enough. Whites simply cannot believe that other races could behave like animals, and they cannot imagine that anything other than good intentions and mollycoddling could and should be applied. But this policy is ultimately unrealistic and unintentionally cruel.
This is why the races should be separated. It works for Japan. Let the Blacks judge and mistreat their own kind. We are arrogant fools to try to "civilize" them. We have our own problems to worry about.