International Jewry's policy of misinformation

The RODOH Lounge is a place for general discussion, preferably non-Holocaust. The Lounge is only lightly moderated but please keep this a friendly place to chat with and get to know your fellow board participants.
User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:00 pm

Here an ex-Jew and ex-Israeli dissects the current 'Jewish' campaign to smear David Icke as an anti-semite...

"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:40 pm

Gilad Atzmon yet again points out the deception of WW2 by Hollywood and in particular by Jewish world-emotional-manipulator-extraordinaire and famed 'story-teller' Stephen Spielberg:
But what about WWII, how many Jews gave their lives on Omaha Beach? Wouldn’t you expect a large number of young Jewish Marines to jump into the freezing water of Normandy on June 6, 1944 (D-Day) in support of the liberation of Europe so they can save their Jewish brothers in the old continent?

A few years ago I visited US military cemeteries in Normandy — many fields suffocated with lines of crosses. I myself couldn’t spot a single Star of David. I thought to myself that the Jewish Marines must have been very lucky, they somehow managed to escape the German bullets and the ferocious Tiger tanks but I was obviously completely wrong.
Steven Spielberg actually managed to find one!



http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2017/11 ... rican-wars
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Tue Dec 05, 2017 8:34 pm

On the Mondoweiss website, Theodore Sayeed discussed a leaked memo of a meeting of the Henry Jackson Society from November 2005:
'One of the items on the minutes, listed prominently in fourth place, was to discredit Chomsky. Their tack was to allege that he is a "denier" of the Srebrenica massacre in Bosnia.
In the art of controversy, slapping the label "denier" on someone is meant to evoke the Holocaust. Chomsky — the furtive charge proceeds — is a kind of Nazi.'
...The task of getting this slur into circulation was delegated to Marko Attila Hoare and Oliver Kamm.
Among the papers chosen to carry the charge were the Guardian, the Times and the Spectator magazine.
As Sayeed noted, 'genocide denial' is intended to present the target as 'a kind of Nazi'. The logic is crude but hidden: Holocaust denial is, of course, widely reviled as the product of minds so poisoned by racist hatred that they reject even obvious truth. Use of the word 'denial' is intended to invite the public to take a mental leap from 'genocide denial' to 'Holocaust denial', thereby tarring left dissidents with the same brush, rendering them intellectually illegitimate in the same way.

Sometimes the connection is made explicit. The same Oliver Kamm who featured in the Henry Jackson Society memo, wrote of us:

'The stuff [by Chomsky and Herman] that they find so impressive is not merely the moral equivalent of Holocaust denial: it is the methodological equivalent too, using literally the same techniques.'

This was 'literally' nonsense. But anyway, Kamm's real purpose was to suggest that we were morally and intellectually 'the same' as, 'equivalent' to, fascist Holocaust deniers. He has also written of us: 'Genocide denial is the organisation's orthodoxy.'

Thus, despite privately sending us numerous, oddly amiable emails over the years — beginning, for example, 'Hello, gents' (Email, September 16, 2017) — Kamm has repeatedly and publicly refused to debate with us on the grounds that we are 'genocide deniers':

'It's extraordinary that you consider you're entitled to be treated attentively, or conversed with at all, when you [engage in genocide denial]... Not with any reputable person, you're not.' (This comment was originally posted under an interview with us on the New Internationalist website, but is now unavailable)

The Kafkaesque logic was as comical as it was closed: Kamm described us as 'genocide deniers', but would not discuss the arguments for and against so labelling us. Why? Because we were 'genocide deniers'.

http://www.medialens.org/index.php/aler ... enial.html
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:02 am

.
Check out this part of the JFK assassination misinformation campaign.

Starting to see the pattern of behaviour yet?
I would be remiss in not addressing the question of CIA involvement alongside the Mossad in the JFK assassination.

By 1963 John F. Kennedy was not only at war with Israel and the Meyer Lansky Organized Crime Syndicate, but he was also at war with their close ally in the international intelligence underworld — the CIA.

Final Judgment shows that Israel’s chief contact at the CIA, the Soviet-hating James Jesus Angleton, ultimately played a pivotal role in the JFK assassination conspiracy cover-up.

In light of the Angleton connection, I should note how the worldwide media has given great play to the release of a new book that purported to "prove" that it was the Soviet KGB that concocted the story that the CIA was behind the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

The book purported to be the inside history of the KGB’s secret intelligence operations in the U.S. and Europe The Sword and the Shield by Professor Christopher Andrew of Cambridge — described as "one of the world’s leading authorities on intelligence history,".

The book was said to be based on extensive notes and transcriptions (secretly compiled over a 12 year period) of vast numbers of files from the KGB archives. The notes themselves were supposedly smuggled out of KGB headquarters by former KGB archivist Vasili Mitrokhin who retired from the KGB in 1984 and who then defected to Britain in 1992 after the CIA had rejected Mitrokhin.

One major problem with the Andrew book is that while it is quite thoroughly footnoted, with hundreds of references to a wide-ranging amount of material, it is not always clear (actually, more often than not) whether Andrew is purporting to cite the Mitrokhin archives as his source or whether the information he is presenting is Andrew’s own interpretation, based on the material of others.

In that sense, then, while the book is quite skilfully written in such a way that it appears to present the information presented as having come from the KGB’s supposedly purloined file, that is not always necessarily the case.
It appears Andrew’s book is presenting the Mitrokhin archives as some sort of effort to counter new official histories of the KGB that are being released by the KGB’s post-Soviet era successor, the SVR.
For example, Andrew lashes out at Lolly Zamoysky, the SVR’s literary editor of the new multi-volume official history, as having been "well known" in the KGB "for his belief in a global Masonic-Zionist plot."

Thus, Andrew’s book is effectively an attempt to counter allegations of high-level Zionist intrigue that has been documented by the official post-KGB Russian intelligence services.

In that regard, it is quite remarkable to note that in the entirety of this extensively documented and indexed 700-page volume, there is only one indexed reference to Israel and not a single indexed reference to the Mossad, this despite the widely-known fact that the Mossad played a central role alongside the CIA in its operations in Western Europe throughout the period that Andrew has purported to describe.

Likewise, in the same vein, there are only two indexed references to the CIA’s longtime counterintelligence chief, James Jesus Angleton, even though Angleton, who is best remembered for his strident anti-Soviet stance, having spent decades looking for a "KGB mole" in the upper echelons of the CIA and for KGB moles in allied Western intelligence agencies — was also a devoted Israeli loyalist who jealously guarded his role as the CIA’s liaison to the Mossad.

Perhaps the most glaring evidence of outright fraud, per se, in the Andrew production is the flimsy and quite transparent attempt to absolve the CIA of any involvement in the assassination of John F. Kennedy and, at the same time, make it appear as though so-called "theories" linking the CIA to the crime were exclusively disinformation put forth by the KGB.

http://www.afrocubaweb.com/news/mossadjfk.htm
See more here: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1779&p=117399#p117399
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:49 am

Here's the latest smear campaign in the Guardian newspaper.

The accusation is the 'anti-semitism' canard. And they do this knowing that if anyone is brave enough to publically point out that it is yet another Jewish-led misinformation campaign, then they get silenced by being accused of being an 'anti-semite'.
The logic is so circular.
And so many fall for it.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... p_WhatsApp
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 20338
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by Nessie » Thu Dec 07, 2017 9:10 am

been-there wrote:
Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:49 am
Here's the latest smear campaign in the Guardian newspaper.

The accusation is the 'anti-semitism' canard. And they do this knowing that if anyone is brave enough to publically point out that it is yet another Jewish-led misinformation campaign, then they get silenced by being accused of being an 'anti-semite'.
The logic is so circular.
And so many fall for it.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... p_WhatsApp
Who is being silenced? The answer is no one. An Israeli MP has said "that Hamas is a recognised terror organisation, that you cannot have a regular relationship with a terror organisation.” That fails to understand the very strong relationship the British Government built with the likes of Sinn Fein and how that brought about peace. The accusation of anti-Semitic was acutually

"Asked specifically whether he was suggesting Corbyn himself was an antisemite, the Israeli minister paused, before adding: “I didn’t say it. I said there are views that are very close to antisemitism in the leadership of the Labour party today in the UK.”

There is no circular logic in the Guardian article. I will add deliberate misrepresentation and deception to been-there's list of plagiariser, cherry picking copy and paster and censor.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:21 pm

.
Example of the visceral, unholy hatred and quite wicked attitude of vengeance from Rabbi Zev Friedman based on the peculiar Ashkenazi Jewish combination of an elitist superiority complex combined with a 'special suffering' victim complex.

Image

Image

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... 82b4045b37
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:04 pm

Here's a recent assessment of how pro-Israeli Jews routinely deceive the masses. It mentions how their distortion of WW2 history plays a large part in that deception.
The unfortunate Donald Trump Administration decision to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel serves no visible American interest, in spite of what some of the always-loyal-to-Israel punditry has been suggesting ...

The evolving situation is likely to develop into Israel and the United States versus the rest of the world ...

The truth about Israel is quite unpleasant, so it has been necessary to construct a completely untrue but compelling counter-narrative which relies psychologically on cultivation of claims of perpetual victimhood linked repeatedly to the holocaust.

http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/a-good-year ... s-friends/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 6628
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by been-there » Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:43 pm

In December 1941 Mr Hughes Hallett of the British diplomatic outpost in Ecuador enquired what questions to ask one hundred German Jewish refugees shortly arriving in Ecuador from the war zones of Europe.
Here is the official British Foreign Office's answer:
British Foreign Office wrote:Information from Jewish refugees is generally coloured and frequently unreliable
F.O. to Quito, No. 105,
December 27th, 1941. (PRO file FO.371/26515)
http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/WSC/Typhuswar.html
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
NSDAP
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:33 am
Location: München, Deutschland

Re: International Jewry's policy of misinformation

Post by NSDAP » Sat Jan 06, 2018 6:54 pm

been-there wrote:
Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:43 pm
In December 1941 Mr Hughes Hallett of the British diplomatic outpost in Ecuador enquired what questions to ask one hundred German Jewish refugees shortly arriving in Ecuador from the war zones of Europe.
Here is the official British Foreign Office's answer:
British Foreign Office wrote:Information from Jewish refugees is generally coloured and frequently unreliable
F.O. to Quito, No. 105,
December 27th, 1941. (PRO file FO.371/26515)
http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/WSC/Typhuswar.html
Imagine if they said this Information from Black refugees is generally colored and frequently unreliable
𝕾𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖗𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖙𝖘𝖟𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖗𝖆𝖑𝖊

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests