SS Blutrichter Judge Konrad Morgan

This is the place for your questions, propositions, formal debate topics, etc. but they do have to be approved by the Moderator before they will be published visibly, and must not address opponents disrespectfully, if at all. The subjects have to be simple or straightforward and kept on topic.

Moderators: been-there, Budu Svanidze

Post Reply
User avatar
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 7786
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:59 am

SS Blutrichter Judge Konrad Morgan

Post by been-there » Sun Jul 23, 2017 2:04 am


Georg Konrad Morgen (8 June 1909 – 4 February 1982) was an SS judge and lawyer who was given the task by SS Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler of investigating crimes committed by Himmler's SS personnel. Morgen worked within the SS Judiciary, a system of courts that tried cases against members of the the Allgemeine-SS and Waffen-SS.

In 1941 and the first half of 1942, he investigated financial corruption by members of the SS in occupied Poland. Morgen’s first assignment in the SS judiciary in 1941 was in Kraków, the seat of German administration in the portion of occupied Poland not incorporated into the Reich. Shortly after arriving there, Morgen began investigating members of Himmler’s circle.

In July 1943, Heinrich Himmler chose Morgen to investigate SS corruption in the concentration camps.
He rose to the rank of SS-Sturmbannführer (Major).
Morgen was known as a Blutrichter — a judge authorised to pass death sentences.

After the war all SS personell received especially harsh and brutal treatment at the hands of the Allied victors [1], many receiving torture and summary execution. Morgen was imprisoned in Dachau. He recounted how he was beaten in order to intimidate him into giving false testimony.
Morgen was later called as a witness at the show-trials of NSDAP high command at the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg. He also appeared in court at the trial of SS WVHA members, and the 1965 Auschwitz trial in Frankfurt–am–Main.

He gave his last deposition in 1980, two years before his death.

Morgen once described himself as a Gerechtigkeitsfanatiker – a fanatic for justice.


. . . . . . . . . .

Born in Frankfurt, Morgen graduated from the University of Frankfurt and the Hague Academy of International Law, before becoming a judge in Stettin.
At the outbreak of the war, he was drafted into the Waffen-SS and sent for basic military training.


After the invasion of France in 1940, he was employed as a judge in the SS Judiciary, which assigned him to its court in Krakow.
Morgen wrote:I said to the man in the personnel office that I would like to resume employment in my profession, since if one has just passed one’s exams and then leaves the profession for more than a year, it is very hard to work one’s way back in. He said, “OK, the Head Office of the SS Judiciary is looking for judges. So you’ll get a job there.”
In Krakow he investigated several highly placed SS officers for corruption, including Hermann Fegelein, the future liason oficer of Heinrich Himmler, and the future brother-in-law of Eva Braun and Adolf Hitler. He also exposed one of Fegelein's co-conspirators, a mistress of Albert Fassbender (commander of an SS cavalry brigade) named Jaroslawa Mirowska, as a Polish spy and as the head of the Polish underground.

After requesting a transfer, Morgen served with the Wiking Division on the Eastern Front. Most histories claim that Himmler sent him there as a punishment for investigating the SS too successfully. Which appears to be an example of the currently accepted and promulgated history's inclusions of self-contradicting, delusional deceit, as in mid-1943 Himmler recalled Morgen to investigate and prosecute corruption in the concentration camp system. Why would Himmler do that if he had got rid of Morgen because he had investigated too thoroughly, too justly and too honestly previously?


Morgen's investigations included Karl-Otto Koch the commandant of both Buchenwald and Majdanek; Koch's wife Ilse Koch; SS officer Martin Sommer; and Buchenwald's camp doctor Waldemar Hoven. Charges included theft, military insubordination, and murder.

When he found that prisoners in Buchenwald had disappeared — especially those who had witnessed corruption — he inferred that they had been murdered. Consequently, after corroborating investigation, he drew up charges against Karl Otto Koch of murder during his time as the commandant of Buchenwald.
Morgen succesfully investigated, tried, and convicted Commandant Koch. He had him executed at Buchenwald by SS firing squad on April 5th 1945, shortly before the end of the war.

Karl-Otto and Ilse Koch

Ilse Koch on trial at Dachau after the war.

In post-war testimony, Morgen exposed the bogus atrocity-propaganda allegations against Frau Koch of an alleged fetish with lampshades made of tatooed human skin from Jewish inmates. He had personally searched Koch's home near Buchenwald and knew these were false rumours. He later told the American journalist John Toland that because he persisted in denying the story he was threatened with beatings and actually was beaten twice by Allied interrogators preparing statements for IMT at Nuremberg.

In addition to prosecuting concentration-camp officers during the war, Morgen had sought an arrest warrant for Adolf Eichmann, as Eichmann himself confirmed at his show-trial in Jerusalem. The 'crime' the prosecution was concerning was corruption, viz. for allegedly embezzling a pouch of diamonds.

Morgen then spent the latter half of 1943 — after the case of corruption at Buchenwald — investigating Dachau and other camps, including Kraków-Płaszów, the camp made famous by the Jewish 'Holocaust' promoter Stephen Spielberg in his film Schindler’s List (1993). In one scene from the film, workers are unloading provisions ordered for 10,000 prisoners — non-existent prisoners invented by the commandant, Amon Göth, so that he could requisition extra provisions to sell on the black market. The film's narrator remarks that Göth is being audited by the SS. These SS investigators were working for Morgen.

During the late summer and fall of 1943, Morgen looked into rumours that Christian Wirth — who, unbeknownst to Morgen, was supervisor of the camps of Operation Reinhard — had permitted SS officers to participate in a drunken Jewish wedding near Lublin. Investigating, he found Wirth presiding over a collection centre for vast quantities of clothing and valuables from the victims.
On one visit to Lublin, Morgen arrived soon after Aktion Erntefest (Operation Harvest Festival): the liquidation of the three largest camps (Majdanek, Poniatowa, and Trawniki) and several smaller Jewish labour camps in the Lublin area. The operation, carried out as a pre-emptive security measure, was ordered by Himmler after inmates had obtained weapons and were discovered operating with communist partisans active in the surrounding forests. Morgen arrived the day after the executions had ended and so he compiled a report from the testimony of eyewitnesses. A portion of this was later read out in the pre-trial interrogation of Ernst Kaltenbrunner at Nuremberg: "the men went first, filing into one trench, and later the nude women had their own separate trenches....all passed silently and methodically through the trenches, so the executions went very quickly."
The Allied victors made false allegations to incriminate Morgen, claiming he had been present at the massacre itself, and that he had tried to prevent the industrialist Walter Többens from intervening. These were later exposed and acknowledged to be unfounded allegations.

Two packages of dental gold, sent by an Auschwitz dental technician to his wife, had been confiscated by postal inspectors and passed on to Morgen for investigation. Realising that the gold must have been collected from camp inmates, Morgen sent an investigative team to Auschwitz and later visited himself, receiving a thorough tour of the centre at Birkenau. During his investigation his assistant SS-Stabsscharführer Gerhard Putsch disappeared and the building where his evidence files were stored, burned down. He went on to prosecute the camp commandant Rudolf Höss and the Chief of the camp Gestapo, Maximilian Grabner, for crimes including murder.

Morgen reported what he had found to several of his superiors, including the chief of the Gestapo, Heinrich Müller: “Obergruppenführer Müller was surprised to hear about the illegal executions in the concentration camps, namely about the acts committed in the concentration camps against the law, and he was also surprised at the large extent of crime.”

Much later, after the war and during the 1964 trial at Frankfurt, Morgen claimed that these prosecutions were an attempt to impede the allegations of mass exterminations that were a part of we now know by the name ‘the Holocaust’. But there is no contemporary documentary evidence to support this. His testimony regarding knowledge of mass exterminations is contradictory and became more detailed the further from the events.

The trials of Koch and Grabner took place in the autumn of 1944. According to Morgen's post-war testimony, other SS officers who feared prosecution observed the proceedings. They gathered after hours with members of the court and denounced Morgen as a self-promoter, a liar, and an enemy of the SS. Morgen felt himself to be on trial and he heard rumours that corrupt SS officers were declaring him ‘a dead man’. In a dramatic letter to his fiancée, he wrote: ‘Defenceless, I stood alone in the storm as the object of the tribunal. […] It is a sad and thankless business to be the state’s prosecutor of state institutions’.

Some histories blatantly lie about Morgen's succesful prosecutions, as it so contradicts and upsets the 'holocaust' narrative. E.g. here is one such bogus history trying to minimise and explain away Morgen's wartime service:
Buchenwald commandant Koch was convicted, but only on a charge of corruption, though he was indeed executed in 1945, shortly before the end of the war. The trial of Auschwitz Gestapo chief Grabner was recessed until the spring, never to resume. Grabner’s punishment had to wait until 1948, when he was executed by a war-crimes tribunal in Poland.



After the war he continued a legal career in Frankfurt, where he died on 4th February 1982.

Some of those indicted by Morgen
Karl-Otto Koch – Commandant of Buchenwald and Majdanek – executed for the murder of two hospital orderlies who had treated him for syphilis.

Martin Sommer – Buchenwald officer, indicted along with Koch. Transferred to the Russian Front; died in prison in 1988.

Hauptscharführer Blanck – Buchenwald officer, indicted along with Koch. Fate unknown.

Hermann Florstedt – Commandant of Majdanek – said to have been executed for murder 1945; fate uncertain.

Hermann Hackmann – in charge of protective custody in Majdanek – condemned to death for murder but eventually posted to a penal unit; died 1994.

Hans Loritz – Commandant of Oranienburg – proceedings initiated on suspicion of arbitrary killing; committed suicide 1946.

Adam Grünewald – Commandant of Herzogenbusch concentration camp – found guilty of maltreatment of prisoners and posted to a penal unit; killed in 1945.

Karl Künstler – Commandant of Flossenbürg concentration camp – dismissed for drunkenness and debauchery; missing in 1945.

Alex Piorkowski – Commandant of the Dachau concentration camp – accused of murder but not sentenced; executed by the Allies in 1948.

Maximilian Grabner – Head of Political Section in Auschwitz – accused of murder but not sentenced. Grabner was later hanged after the war by the Allies on 28th January 1948 in Poland.

Gerhard Palitzsch – Sentenced to prison; disappeared in June 1944.

Amon Göth – Sentenced to death. Executed in 1946 by the Polish government after the war.

Hans Aumeier – Tried, convicted. Executed in 1948 by the Polish government after the war.

Waldemar Hoven - Waffen SS Hauptsturmführer (Captain). Arrested by Morgen in 1943. Convicted and sentenced to death. Released in March 1945 due to the Nazi shortage of doctors. Hanged by the Allied victors on June 2th 1948 at Landsberg prison in Bavaria.


REFERENCES ... type=topic ... the-system

. . . . . . .

[1] Examples of Allied special treatment of SS soldiers:
Some years after the war a mass grave was discovered just west of the city of Nuremberg. In it were the bodies of some 200 SS soldiers. It was not until 1976 that one of the bodies was positively identified. It was the body of SS Hauptsturmfuhrer Kukula, the commander of the 1st Battalion, 38th SS Panzer Grenadier Regiment. Autopsies on the other bodies showed that most had been shot at close range, the others beaten to death by the rifle butts of the US Seventh Army GIs. In the village of Eberstetten, 17 German soldiers of the 'Gotz von Berlichingen' Division were shot after they surrendered to US troops.

...Despite the German observance of convention the American forces response was often as summary and as brutal as those practiced by their Soviet allies. Only in cases where large numbers of captured soldiers had been taken were they to be enslaved. If captured in smaller groups the US Army policy was simply to slaughter their captured prisoners where they stood.

One such case was the cold-blooded slaying of an estimated 700 troops of the 8th SS Mountain Division. These troops who had fought with honorable distinction had earlier captured a US field hospital. Although the German troops had conducted themselves properly they were, when subsequently captured by the US Army, routinely separated and gunned down in groups by squads of American troops.
-- Alliierte Kreigsverbrechen und Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit.
Last edited by Scott on Fri Sep 15, 2017 4:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Posts: 2518
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:33 am
Location: München, Deutschland

Re: SS Blutrichter Judge Konrad Morgan

Post by NSDAP » Sat Jun 30, 2018 8:41 pm

I found a fairly recent re covering of this on You Tube.

User avatar
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 7786
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:59 am

Re: SS Blutrichter Judge Konrad Morgan

Post by been-there » Thu Aug 02, 2018 9:07 am

Further to the consideration of the role of Konrad Morgen in prosecuting criminality in the concentration camps and his evolving perception and account of it, here is a translation of a telegram he wrote to David Irving in July 1974 concerning Kaltenbrunner's concluding statement at the post-war Nuremberg Allied show-trials.
Konrad Morgen wrote:FRANKFURT, 10th July 1974

Re: Kaltenbrunner

Dear Mr. Irving,

I can answer your request of 2.7.74 as follows:

1. [It is] false that Kaltenbrunner had arranged for my transfer to Amt 5 of the RSHA.

I was a war judge of the Waffen SS, member of the main SS court, (Chief Obergruppenführer Breithaupt). My transfer (proper Abkommandierung) could only be authorised by someone who stood above the three chiefs of office, i.e. Himmler himself.

Himmler had arranged my assignment to the RKPA [Reich Criminal Police Office], because of my work as SS judge during my activity in occupied Poland against the head of the Department of Economy and Chief of Administration Pohl who had become unpopular with steward leaders and many others.

The express instruction was, on the one hand to keep me away from the matters concerning processing of political crime and, on the other hand, to use my proven criminal [investigation] capabilities.

This seemed to Himmler to be guaranteed by my assignment to the Reich Criminal Police Office.

2.) False is Kaltenbrunner's assertion that I had been added to supplement a special commission to investigate the concentration camps.

When I first arrived at the RKPA they did not know what to do with me. An investigation commission of the concentration camps did not exist. Neither could it exist. Because the criminal police — whose headquarters were within the RKPA — was responsible only for the criminality of civilians, but not for those in the SS units. The Gestapo, in turn, was only responsible for political investigations, but not for criminal ones. The SS jurisdiction would have been competent, but was dependent on an accusatory report from the concentration camp SS units. But where there is no plaintiff, there is no investigative judge.
It was an outright coincidence that I came into this gap.

3.) False is Kaltenbrunner's assertion that he drove to the Führer's headquarters the day after my report

For Starr, also Kaltenbrunner, for everyone, "the iron was too hot". So one sent me to another. Nebe referred me to Kaltenbrunner, Kaltenbrunner to Breithaupt (Chief Main Office SS Court), he to his connecting leader, to Himmler. And so I (at the time a lieutenant) had to drive to the Führer's headquarters in East Prussia to give a lecture.

4.) Also false is the assertion that the destruction of the Jews had been stopped there. At the beginning of my investigation I had no idea of ​​the extermination of the Jews. That came much later. My report about my initial research results was exclusively about the corruption of the Standartenführer Koch, [who was] the commander of the Buchenwald and Lublin concentration camps, and his wife Ilse.

5.) False also is Kaltenbrunner's assertion that he supported my investigations. The opposite is true. He and Pohl finally managed to get out of the examination in summer 1944.

6.) It is correct that due to my investigations, existing orders to protect the lives and property of the prisoners were tightened. The concentration camp personnel were shocked by arrests and convictions. The hitherto unknown conditions within the SS units were generally publicised and Himmler thereby came under strong moral pressure.

The worsening war situation aroused the resistance of the SS Generalitat against Hitler. Pushed by them, Himmler made secret connections to foreign countries; also to Jewish organisations. But this had the precondition that he stopped the extermination of the Jews.

Yours faithfully

Konrad Morgen
DAVID IRVING NOTES: Morgen's memory is probably wrong about Nebe. Nebe was implicated in the July 20, 1944, bomb plot against Hitler, vanished on that date, was captured many weeks later and hanged. ... 00794.html

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest