Is the TIK History Channel a Shill Operation?

This board is open for all subject matters. Post information and discussion materials about open-debate and censorship on other boards (including this one) here. Memory Hole 2 is a RODOH subforum for alternate perspectives.
Post Reply
User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 2937
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Is the TIK History Channel a Shill Operation?

Post by Charles Traynor » Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:14 pm

The TIK History channel has been making a name for itself on YouTube recently. Unfortunately after quitting his job and going full time as a blogger the channels creator seems to have sold out and is now shilling fulltime for the exterminationists.

Here is the video that vexed me and opened my eyes to this fellows duplicity:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmwogdxsUbA


Image
Image

As expected TIK responded to my original post by concentrating on the UK in order to distract attention away from the many European countries with HD laws.
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 2937
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the TIK History Channel a Shill Operation?

Post by Charles Traynor » Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:25 pm

I was inaccurate in stating citizens of the USA believe in freedom of speech. The masses don't really care about anything and the the First Amendment will likely soon be repealed if those we "dare not name" continue to control the news and entertainment industry in North Amerika for much longer.
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 2937
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the TIK History Channel a Shill Operation?

Post by Charles Traynor » Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:39 pm

LOl! My comments on the TIK History channel have disappeared down the Memory Hole.
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
Charles Traynor
Posts: 2937
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the TIK History Channel a Shill Operation?

Post by Charles Traynor » Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:14 pm

To his credit TIK History has for now allowed a link to my 2014 RODOH post exposing Alan Heath as a liar to remain on his channel.

Image

Alan Heath is exposed as a liar
Kitty Hart-Moxon (1998): "Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it."

User avatar
DabbingIsSoMuchFun
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:19 pm
Location: Controlling the World by virtue of my existence.
Contact:

Re: Is the TIK History Channel a Shill Operation?

Post by DabbingIsSoMuchFun » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:35 pm

He's Anti-Nazi and Anti-Commie; works for me.
Holocaust-Leugnung ist keine Geschichte!

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4937
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Is the TIK History Channel a Shill Operation?

Post by Huntinger » Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:11 pm

DabbingIsSoMuchFun wrote: ↑
Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:35 pm
Anti-Commie; works for me.
Works for most people
π•½π–Šπ–Žπ–ˆπ–π–˜π–˜π–Žπ–ˆπ–π–Šπ–—π–π–Šπ–Žπ–™π–˜π–‰π–Žπ–Šπ–“π–˜π–™

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests