Alison Chabloz

This board is open for all subject matters. Post information and discussion materials about open-debate and censorship on other boards (including this one) here. Memory Hole 2 is a RODOH subforum for alternate perspectives.
User avatar
NSDAP
Posts: 2531
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:33 am
Location: München, Deutschland

Alison Chabloz

Post by NSDAP » Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:34 am

Satirist Alison Chabloz prosecuted for rather funny songs which even Jude can laugh at. Judge rules songs were not satirical as Alison Chabloz claimed, but intended to insult Jewish people. Alison Chabloz, 54, was convicted of three charges relating to three of her songs at Westminster magistrates court on Friday. The district judge, John Zani, said he was satisfied the material was grossly offensive and that Chabloz intended to insult Jewish people.

The prosecutor Karen Robinson previously told the court: “Miss Chabloz’s songs are a million miles away from an attempt to provide an academic critique of the Holocaust
Image

“They’re not political songs. They are no more than a dressed-up attack on a group of people for no more than their adherence to a religion.”

The songs Chabloz were charged over included one titled (((survivors))) – using the white supremacist online convention of placing Jewish names within three brackets. The prosecution was initially brought privately by the charity , then taken over by the CPS.
Alison Chabloz was sentenced to 20 weeks imprisonment after being convicted of violating laws against “offensive” or menacing messages, but a judge suspended the punishment for two years.

District judge John Zani banned the 54-year-old from posting anything on social media for a year and ordered her to carry out 180 hours of unpaid work. The Judge would understand that more than most as no doubt he carries out many hours of paid non work.
What do you think. I think the Jews need to laugh at themselves as all people do and lighten up.
Wenn wir die Flagge, die wir aus dem Nichts gerissen haben, nicht halten können, müssen Sie, meine Söhne und Töchter, greifendie Fahne in deiner Faust...Führer der NSDAP Adolf Hitler
𝕹𝕾𝕯𝕬𝕻

User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 2150
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 am
Location: USA, West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by Scott » Tue Sep 18, 2018 4:10 am

The Holocaust is essentially a secular RELIGION, and a dominant one at that. This is why its doubters are prosecuted and harassed as blasphemers and Haters, and intellectual terrorists at the least.

For the cultural-Bolshevist Left, any ideas that they don't like are Hate-speech by definition and tantamount to literal violence; whereas their own legal harassment of opponents is considered to be prophylactic, and even their literal violence against disbelievers they consider to be DEFENSIVE by some such sophistry.

We saw this play out in real life during the Charlottesville, Virginia and Washington, DC protests in August of 2017 and 2018. Merely going to an event with a lawful court-ordered permit is considered an attempted terrorist act. Meanwhile, violence from the Left, including illegally toppling historical statues honoring White people, is barely prosecuted and never reported on truthfully by the corporate media.

A jury recently awarded damages to Jason Kessler, the organizer of the rallies, who was assaulted by an Antifa; he was awarded the grand total of $1, which means that although violence is still technically against the letter of the law, it is understood that when it is carried out against White people who advocate for White people, it could not be more Kosher.

If pushed to logical extremes, this kind of attitude eventually will not go well for Jewish people. In fact, there is a long history of this sort of thing. They have a long history of fomenting the "Race card" as a weapon against Gentiles.


[SNIP]

[EDIT: Removed large portion (some fit for Siberian Exile subforum) since it veers wildly off topic.]

[/SNIP]



Holocaust propaganda is just one of the items in the subversive Leftist toolkit--and it must be defended from any Doubt--and its belief mandated with religious zealotry.

:)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.”
~ Major General J.F.C. Fuller,
historian – England

User avatar
NSDAP
Posts: 2531
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:33 am
Location: München, Deutschland

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by NSDAP » Thu Sep 20, 2018 6:03 am

Wenn wir die Flagge, die wir aus dem Nichts gerissen haben, nicht halten können, müssen Sie, meine Söhne und Töchter, greifendie Fahne in deiner Faust...Führer der NSDAP Adolf Hitler
𝕹𝕾𝕯𝕬𝕻

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8131
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by been-there » Sun May 12, 2019 5:56 pm

.
Criminalisation of revisionism ~ a bullet in the Shoah lobby’s foot

by Alison Chabloz | April 23rd, 2019

During my three-day appeal last February, the prosecution’s main argument regarding the facts — i.e are my songs “grossly offensive” under S. 127 of the 2003 Communications Act — relied on Judge Charles Gray’s 2000 ruling in the Irving vs Lipstadt case. According to both James Mulholland QC and Judge Chris Hehir, Judge Gray’s ruling provided the appropriate benchmark by which to (a) define “Holocaust denial” and (b) prove that the Holocaust happened according to the standard narrative (viz. six million Jews killed mostly in gas chambers as part of a pre-planned mass-extermination of Jews by the Nazis).

In response to the court’s decision to uphold my sentence, I wish to cite a passage from the end of Thomas Dalton’s book Debating the Holocaust – a new look at both sides that deals with Cambridge historian Richard Evans’s 2001 book Lying About Hitler. Evans acted as Lipstadt’s expert witness; his book describes his impressions of the case.

Dalton’s scathing treatment of Evans’s chapter on the Irving vs Lipstadt trial raises serious concerns not only regards Evans’s intellectual capabilities; Dalton’s appraisal also calls into question Judge Gray’s ruling and its consequences for further revisionist witch-trials here in England. The passage comes at the very end of the book, in the Epilogue, on pages 293 to 294.

Dalton’s work is highly recommended reading. It can be found here where you can also download a free PDF “peek” preview. Here’s the relevant passage:
6. The anti-revisionist response is highly revealing

Since the year 2000, there have been only a few attempts by orthodox historians to respond directly to revisionist challenges.[…]

In Chapter 4 of his book – “Irving and Holocaust Denial” – [Richard] Evans attempts to summarise and rebut the revisionist point of view, with the ultimate goal of proving David Irving a ‘denier’. In order to do so, he must define ‘Holocaust denial,’ show that it is wrong, and demonstrate that Irving supported it. On the first count, Evans proposes four pillars of denial: (1) less than six million Jews killed; (2) gas chambers were not used to any large degree; (3) the National Socialists’ intention was deportation and not mass murder; and (4) the Holocaust story is “a myth invented by Allied propaganda,” and “the supposed difference… was fabricated after the war”. We can agree with the first three, but the last is not defended by any revisionist of the past 30 years or so.

Evans then reviews the revisionist movement, employing a number deceptive tactics...
Alison's blog and the rest of this entry can be found here
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Smallhausen
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 6:04 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by Smallhausen » Mon May 13, 2019 5:49 am

I think that the song (((survivors))) should be continued so that the world knows what this great lady was fighting for.
I post this on here. Juden verabscheuen, Juden meiden.
Herr Engelbert Von Smallhausen
Key Stoned cops..Gustarpow

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8131
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by been-there » Wed May 15, 2019 7:23 am

.
Interested readers can now view PDFs of the official court documents concerning both of Alison's February 2019 appeals. Here is an excerpt from her blog with quotes from the court documents interspersed with her comments.

The court make the interesting admission that having anti-semitic opinions is not a crime. It appears they sentenced her for something else — for being “offensive”!!! :o

And appears it was not just that either, (as I assume that is not a crime either). Read on...
Alson wrote: “Preliminary Ruling (regards “sending”, etc.) and Wednesday’s Judgement.

For those less inclined to wade through pages of text and case law quotations, certain paragraphs have been selected and reproduced below, with emphasis added.”
we emphasise that anti-Semitism is not a crime, just as Holocaust denial is not. Nor can the fact that somebody is a Holocaust denier or an anti-Semite prove that anything she writes or sings is grossly offensive. However her anti-Semitism and her attitude to the Holocaust are in our judgment highly relevant to her state of mind so far as her musical compositions are concerned.
Alison: In short, I am guilty of refusing to worship Jews and their lies. Indeed, my sentence was [considered] far too lenient — an opinion currently being aired on various social media platforms...

...it is ironic and amusing to see these powerful Jew-Zionists running in all directions, complaining and playing victim over a silly song; this entire farce of course also being played out in the English court system, with compliant judges simply parroting the usual insults and ad hominem.
27. We turn finally to the appellant’s mens rea. We are sure, in relation to each song, that the appellant positively intended it to be grossly offensive to Jews. We are further satisfied that, although part of her intended audience on YouTube was persons sharing her own warped outlook, she embedded the hyperlink [Charges 1 and 2] and uploaded the video [Charge 3] in the hope that those who saw and heard the songs would include Jewish people who would be grossly offended by them.
Alison: Anti-Semitism not a crime. “Holocaust” “denial” not a crime. Offending Jews is.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8131
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by been-there » Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:10 am

.
Alison's year-long social media ban is now over, comments are again open.

https://alisonchabloz.com/2019/06/23/qu ... fUEfJB0eug

StephenP
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 6:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by StephenP » Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:58 am

Well, it's rather pointless to get all excited over really bad songs.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 3774
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by Huntinger » Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:52 am

StephenP wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:58 am
Well, it's rather pointless to get all excited over really bad songs.
I thought (((survivors))) was rather good. Perhaps the kindergartens should teach it to the kids.
𝕲𝖊𝕾𝖙𝖆𝕻𝖔
𝔊𝔢𝔥𝔢𝔦𝔪𝔢 𝔲𝔫𝔡 𝔖𝔱𝔞𝔞𝔱𝔰𝔭𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔷𝔢𝔦 𝔣𝔲̈𝔯 𝔡𝔢𝔫 𝔖𝔦𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔯𝔥𝔢𝔦𝔱𝔰𝔡𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔱

StephenP
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 6:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Alison Chabloz

Post by StephenP » Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:57 am

Huntinger wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:52 am
StephenP wrote:
Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:58 am
Well, it's rather pointless to get all excited over really bad songs.
I thought (((survivors))) was rather good. Perhaps the kindergartens should teach it to the kids.
Really? Why would you want to frighten children?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest