Recently David Green began a topic which in my opinion proves conclusively Kitty Hart-Moxon plagiarised vast tracts of Krystyna Zywulska's book I Came Back. Ian Hazard then repeated David's post at SSF and shortly afterwards Jeffk1970 showed up here inviting us all over to SSF to debate the subject.
Currently there are 28 posts in Ian's Hazard's topic. Three of them are by Ian and the other twenty five are exactly like the infantile trash seen in the image below. To call SSF a failed forum these days is being polite.
Jeffk1970 likes to talk tough when he visits us, but in reality he is a feeble child who is too scared to express his own opinion just in case he upsets StatMech by saying the wrong thing. If in doubt all the "Skeptics" at SSF know that behaving like retards and trashing topics is the standard operating procedure they should adopt when faced with subjects that demand they stand up like men and make their opinions on controversial subjects known in public.
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 38#p622038
The immediately prior post was December 2016. I guess Stat. Mech. is desperately digging really far back to find something to discuss at SSF.
He's also under the delusion that I used to post at SSF under the name "Chester". To set the record straight... again... I have never posted at SSF and I have only posted here at Rodoh except for a brief stint at Codoh.
NSDAP wrote: ↑Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:34 amDon't know if its failed but I will join up to look lol. There seems to be quite a lot of cooky stuff there more aligned to conspiracy theory which Jessie Ventura would be proud to belong to. However, there is one subject called "Holocaust Denial" which is not what we are: we are revisionists though some have fairly strong views it would seem. Apart from that thread there seems nothing much in common here. I think RODOH does what it is supposed to quite well. So not sure why you bought that up here: there are many forums out there, this is just another one with different interests for the most aspects unless you think that somehow National Socialist scientists did invent Flying Saucers, met aliens and had a base in the Antarctic and indeed did develop nuclear weapons: some just die I notice due to the layout of the forum being changed, the appearance being cosmetic puts off some people. Did they change the layout there at all?
Come on over.
Yes I am, Charles. So far all of you has behaved like scared little deniers.
You don’t have the guts to face me outside of your widdle echo chamber, Charles. I may be a “feeble child” but at least I’m not a frightened granny grunt, too afraid to put on her big-girl panties and trek out into the world.Jeffk1970 likes to talk tough when he visits us, but in reality he is a feeble child
That’s hysterical, granny grunt. Stat Mech and I disagree, I also disagree with many who post there. We also agree on many things.who is too scared to express his own opinion just in case he upsets StatMech by saying the wrong thing.
That’s also hysterical, granny grunt. I realize Kitty is your particular obsession but frankly I could care less who she is.If in doubt all the "Skeptics" at SSF know that behaving like retards and trashing topics is the standard operating procedure they should adopt when faced with subjects that demand they stand up like men and make their opinions on controversial subjects known in public.
Yer a dull one, granny grunt. I do find your sentimental ravings about the Nazis funny as hell.
I think that forum perhaps need a better time frame than 30 hours between posting and moderation approval. This is a long time to wait between beers.
NSDAP team waiting for potential SSF moderation approval
That’s just the initial time frame. After that it’s instantaneous. It’s no different than here or CODOH.
BTW, I look forward to your posts.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests