Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

[NSDAP]

I think that quotes should be made clear by use of "quotation marks", the source should be provided immediately above or below the quote and the link should be directly to the source, not a link to a link to a link.

This is a forum not a publishing house. I'd rather read cut and paste extracts than links which I hardly ever go to. This is expediency.

[Nessie]

If you make a claim, you link to the source and quote it. What is so hard about that?

[NSDAP]

If you make a claim, you link to the source and quote it. What is so hard about that?

not hard but expediency.

[Nessie]

Expediency, or excuse to make speculative claims that cannot be backed by evidence?

The deniers here continually lie that there is no evidence for the Holocaust. All they do is debate the evidence for the Holocaust and then claim it is all witness lies, forged documents, misunderstood language, doctored or miscaptioned photos etc etc.

The entire works of denier authors such as Mattogno and Rudolf is based on evidence for the Holocaust. They then claim the evidence is all bollocks and therefore the Holocaust did not happen. They don't produce actual evidence of no Holocaust or the alternative they allege. Indeed most deniers are reluctant to make it clear what they say did take place, because they know they would be asked to evidence their claim and they cannot.

That is why been-there heavily censors the new subforum and I am now banished from the main Holocaust forum. Denialism cannot stand being asked to evidence its beliefs.

[Nessie]

I do not think it is acceptable been-there, in the thread on Konrad Morgen here;

viewtopic.php?p=127101#p110635

has quoted two sources as references, when all he has done is plagiarise and copy and pasted most of the OP from those sources. That is not what a reference is. He should instead block quote both showing each as the source.

If the forum wants to have any credibility, allowing such plagiarism should not be allowed.

[NSDAP]

I do not think it is acceptable been-there, in the thread on Konrad Morgen here;

viewtopic.php?p=127101#p110635

has quoted two sources as references, when all he has done is plagiarise and copy and pasted most of the OP from those sources. That is not what a reference is. He should instead block quote both showing each as the source.

If the forum wants to have any credibility, allowing such plagiarism should not be allowed.

This is a forum not a University.

[Nessie]

I do not think it is acceptable been-there, in the thread on Konrad Morgen here;

viewtopic.php?p=127101#p110635

has quoted two sources as references, when all he has done is plagiarise and copy and pasted most of the OP from those sources. That is not what a reference is. He should instead block quote both showing each as the source.

If the forum wants to have any credibility, allowing such plagiarism should not be allowed.

This is a forum not a University.

In primary school with young children it is acceptable to copy and past a collage of photos and others words as clippings. By secondary school, children are expected to be able to read and then report using their own words, to show understanding. Been-there is still at primary school level.

[NSDAP]

If someone else has written exactly what you intend to say then I see little point in re writing it. This is a forum not a high school; what is important is the information.

[rollo the ganger]

NSDAP, please don't take this as confrontational but I'm a bit curious. I see your location on your logo is "München". I assume that is what we Americans refer to as Munich. How is it with what you've been posting here on Rodoh you haven't been hauled off to what we Americans call; the "Pokey"... i.e., Prison. Aren't there laws there in Germany that prevent you from saying the things you say?

[NSDAP]

Hiding in plain sight.