Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

This board is open for all subject matters. Post information and discussion materials about open-debate and censorship on other boards (including this one) here. Memory Hole 2 is a RODOH subforum for alternate perspectives.
User avatar
NSDAP
Posts: 1901
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:33 am

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by NSDAP » Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:03 am

Nessie wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 8:25 pm
I think that quotes should be made clear by use of "quotation marks", the source should be provided immediately above or below the quote and the link should be directly to the source, not a link to a link to a link.
This is a forum not a publishing house. I'd rather read cut and paste extracts than links which I hardly ever go to. This is expediency.
Wir haben dich nie verlassen, wir brauchten Platz. Neue Nazis sind nicht wir. Wir lassen dich nie gehen, also bitte vertraue uns ... NSDAP

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 21996
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Nessie » Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:13 am

If you make a claim, you link to the source and quote it. What is so hard about that?
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
NSDAP
Posts: 1901
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:33 am

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by NSDAP » Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:54 am

Nessie wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:13 am
If you make a claim, you link to the source and quote it. What is so hard about that?
not hard but expediency.
Wir haben dich nie verlassen, wir brauchten Platz. Neue Nazis sind nicht wir. Wir lassen dich nie gehen, also bitte vertraue uns ... NSDAP

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 21996
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Open Thread for COMMENTS questions in new subforum

Post by Nessie » Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:46 am

Expediency, or excuse to make speculative claims that cannot be backed by evidence?

The deniers here continually lie that there is no evidence for the Holocaust. All they do is debate the evidence for the Holocaust and then claim it is all witness lies, forged documents, misunderstood language, doctored or miscaptioned photos etc etc.

The entire works of denier authors such as Mattogno and Rudolf is based on evidence for the Holocaust. They then claim the evidence is all bollocks and therefore the Holocaust did not happen. They don't produce actual evidence of no Holocaust or the alternative they allege. Indeed most deniers are reluctant to make it clear what they say did take place, because they know they would be asked to evidence their claim and they cannot.

That is why been-there heavily censors the new subforum and I am now banished from the main Holocaust forum. Denialism cannot stand being asked to evidence its beliefs.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest