Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog

[Blogbuster]

Despite all the verified hateful actions of the Holocaust Controversies blog and its membership, do people feel the content of that blog, the data itself, is of any value? Many have been disappointed with the proven cut and paste nature of their Manifesto, and clearly most of the blog articles are more of the same. How does HC have the nerve to proclaim itself as a debunker of revisionism when the blog itself has been debunked over and over?

Thoughts?

[Cerdic]

There's a lot of useful information there, even if it is originally from other sources. IMO.

[Blogbuster]

Cerdic, I actually agree, when one cuts and pastes useful information from some good sources that's usually the case. Should they then bill themselves as a repository of information from multiple sources instead of debunker blog? The way they use the useful information they cut & paste is really what's in question.

[HD2014]

Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,

My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.

This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.

The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.

This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.

Quite sad actually.

[mcurtis3]

Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,

My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.

This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.

The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.

This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.

Quite sad actually.

Quite sad when all you're left with is an ad hominem attack. Pretty much all you have said above is false. That won't phase you in the least will it?

[Blogbuster]

This is a discussion on views Mcurtis, this isn't a debate thread. Thank you for your input, but for the record everything HD has stated above has been well documented and proven 100%

[Blogbuster]

Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,

My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.

This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.

The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.

This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.

Quite sad actually.

Quite sad when all you're left with is an ad hominem attack. Pretty much all you have said above is false. That won't phase you in the least will it?

Oh and regarding ad hominem, there was/is an ARC challenge that covers the majority of these topics and that would have put your ad hominem concerns to rest, but of course the HC clan has never dared to accept that challenge.

[HD2014]

Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,

My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.

This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.

The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.

This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.

Quite sad actually.

Quite sad when all you're left with is an ad hominem attack. Pretty much all you have said above is false. That won't phase you in the least will it?

It saddens me to see the disillusionment in your words, however everything I have stated about the Holocaust Controversies blog as a debunking mechanism is factual and correct.

[Blogbuster]

Hey Been-There, what's your view on HC?

In full disclosure Mcurtis is a member of the Holocaust Controversies forum so his reaction is to be expected.

[Blogbuster]

Mcurtis is also a good friend of Sergey Romanov so its even doubly expected