Despite all the verified hateful actions of the Holocaust Controversies blog and its membership, do people feel the content of that blog, the data itself, is of any value? Many have been disappointed with the proven cut and paste nature of their Manifesto, and clearly most of the blog articles are more of the same. How does HC have the nerve to proclaim itself as a debunker of revisionism when the blog itself has been debunked over and over?
Thoughts?
Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
- Blogbuster
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
Blogbuster
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
There's a lot of useful information there, even if it is originally from other sources. IMO.
„(...) Wenn wir irgendetwas beim Nationalsozialismus anerkennen, dann ist es die Anerkennung, daß ihm zum ersten Mal in der deutschen Politik die restlose Mobilisierung der menschlichen Dummheit gelungen ist.“ Kurt Schumacher 23. Februar 1932
- Blogbuster
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
Cerdic, I actually agree, when one cuts and pastes useful information from some good sources that's usually the case. Should they then bill themselves as a repository of information from multiple sources instead of debunker blog? The way they use the useful information they cut & paste is really what's in question.
Blogbuster
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,
My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.
This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.
The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.
This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.
Quite sad actually.
My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.
This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.
The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.
This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.
Quite sad actually.
-HD2014
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
Quite sad when all you're left with is an ad hominem attack. Pretty much all you have said above is false. That won't phase you in the least will it?HD2014 wrote:Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,
My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.
This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.
The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.
This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.
Quite sad actually.
- Blogbuster
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
This is a discussion on views Mcurtis, this isn't a debate thread. Thank you for your input, but for the record everything HD has stated above has been well documented and proven 100%
Blogbuster
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
- Blogbuster
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
mcurtis3 wrote:Quite sad when all you're left with is an ad hominem attack. Pretty much all you have said above is false. That won't phase you in the least will it?HD2014 wrote:Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,
My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.
This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.
The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.
This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.
Quite sad actually.
Oh and regarding ad hominem, there was/is an ARC challenge that covers the majority of these topics and that would have put your ad hominem concerns to rest, but of course the HC clan has never dared to accept that challenge.
Blogbuster
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
mcurtis3 wrote:Quite sad when all you're left with is an ad hominem attack. Pretty much all you have said above is false. That won't phase you in the least will it?HD2014 wrote:Dearest Blogbuster and Cerdic,
My observation is that the Holocaust Controversies blog suffers from an underlying tone of antagonism towards the few readers that have ever bothered to go there. This is quite similar to the negative tone portrayed by Dearest Mr. Hannover on the CODOH forum, but perhaps slightly more arrogant.
This misconceived arrogance by the HC members and founders, appears unbalanced, and very strange considering little, if any of the research work is done of their own labour either in archives or on location at Holocaust sites.
The infamous Sergey Romanov is notoriously known for sending emails to people to point him to a specific answer or trying to manipulate others into doing the research work on his behalf. Dr. Nicholas Terry's work is substandard for someone of his acclaimed status as an academic, and most certainly the acts of Andrew E. Mathis are so dubious in nature that they warrant only disdain.
This must be the reason that blog has diminished in readership from ten visitors a week to one or only two.
Quite sad actually.
It saddens me to see the disillusionment in your words, however everything I have stated about the Holocaust Controversies blog as a debunking mechanism is factual and correct.
-HD2014
- Blogbuster
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
Hey Been-There, what's your view on HC?
In full disclosure Mcurtis is a member of the Holocaust Controversies forum so his reaction is to be expected.
In full disclosure Mcurtis is a member of the Holocaust Controversies forum so his reaction is to be expected.
Blogbuster
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
- Blogbuster
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Views on the Holocaust Controversies blog
Mcurtis is also a good friend of Sergey Romanov so its even doubly expected
Blogbuster
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Get the facts about the strange phenomenon of Holocaust hate blogging!
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=667
http://hateblogwatch.nazihunter.net/forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests