CODOH now on its own...

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
Balsamo
Posts: 603
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 16:05
Contact:

CODOH now on its own...

Post by Balsamo »

I got this message
You have been permanently banned from this board.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

A ban has been issued on your username.
This without warning...not even a 15 days ban disactivated forever...like it's usual. Too sad, i was just making may comeback
I am quite proud to have been able to last that long...more than 250 posts, 162 accepted...which is quite a good number for a non denier poster on Codoh
But, it's all my fault as i dared to used the "N word"...N like Nazi...ouch...
Amazing that on such a forum, normally proud of their opinion, the N word is a slander, an insult...
believing in old fashioned race theories, calling Adolf the greatest man on earth, Hoess and, Heydrich,Eichman, "lawfull Statesmen"...does not make you a national socialist...of course...
But as they claim, "Revisionism will prevail despite repression"...
Irving participating in a provocative "Warheit macht frei" conference does not make him a Nazi...Apologize to all members of Codoh for that.
Vince Reynouard, fighting for Sint-Michael, and self declared national socialist, is not a Nazi...my apologies again...
My mistake too for having let think that Faurisson was a cheater...Sorry for that
And sorry above all to Steve Willow to suggest that you might have some sympathy for the NSDAP and its policies...
And Sorry to Freddy berg who never declared that "The Jews were actually very well treated by the SS"
And Sorry to dear Carolyn Yeager who never had any contact with the ANSWP
Sorry to Professor Faurrisson, Zundel, Irving who are working so hard to tell the truth and never had any contact with Neo-Nazi groups, who never met Thies Christopersen or Otto Remer...It is well known...the truth does not belong to any political movements.

No, the N word is forbidden out there...It is a slander, you know...
Mea Culpa, so i proudly declare
"never in history ever existed any link between political motivated far right party and revisionism.
I know that Revisionism will prevail because of the "natural" open mind of its partisans.
Revisionism is too strong to use "double standards" regarding historical methods. It holds the truth and does not need those tricks.
Never does it mishandle sources, testimonies...and it knows what official document is a forgeries or an original."

Fairwell, CDOH...


Thanks to Codoh moderator to allow me a lifetime of meditation and redemption for i have sinned...
greetings to KINGFISHER who i respect and "Good luck to you, pal",
if he reads this and want to keep in touch
here is my Yuku adress
[email protected] ( and proud of it)
( if some of you are still member of the cesspit, please forward it to him...thanks)

Balsamo.
User avatar
Balsamo
Posts: 603
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 16:05
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Balsamo »

Oh i see now,
actually it is my last post on "Method in history and historigraphy" that got me banned...
That was maybe too much in one time...I surely got out of topic by repeating my unpleasant double standards allegations...OUps...Sadly, the post was deleted...what a surprise...
just love the first "O" in Codoh...
Bob
Posts: 3404
Joined: 06 Sep 2012, 15:30
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Bob »

Balsamo wrote:This without warning
Are you sure you are telling truth?
"by Moderator » Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:36 pm

Balsamo:
Your rather constant claim that certain people are 'Nazis", whatever that means these days, is not a very good starting point when trying to refute Revisionst research. And yes, you do that a lot. You use this as a type of personal slander against Revisionists, a way to deflect from their actual investigations. That is not acceptable here. As has been said, 'there's the Nazis with the 6M & gas chambers, and then there's the Nazis without the 6M & gas chambers.' If you believe in the '6M & gas chambers' then I suggest that you get on with trying to proof it.
M1"


http://forum.codoh.info/viewtopic.php?f ... =30#p53148
Balsamo wrote:calling Adolf the greatest man on earth
Can you provide me with quote from some user who said this?
Balsamo wrote: But, it's all my fault as i dared to used the "N word"...N like Nazi...ouch...

Irving who are working so hard to tell the truth and never had any contact with Neo-Nazi groups, who never met Thies Christopersen or Otto Remer...It is well known...the truth does not belong to any political movements.

Irving participating in a provocative "Warheit macht frei" conference does not make him a Nazi

Vince Reynouard, fighting for Sint-Michael, and self declared national socialist, is not a Nazi...my apologies again...
Can you tell me what the alleged political opinions or "who met who" have to do with arguments?
Balsamo wrote:My mistake too for having let think that Faurisson was a cheater...Sorry for that
Can you show why you did this and what evidence you provided for your claim?

Thank you in advance.
User avatar
Balsamo
Posts: 603
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 16:05
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Balsamo »

Dear Bob,
Funny you mention this comment made by the moderator who of course deleted all the posts that he is referring to...as well as all the answers i gave.
the subject was, "despite the repression, revisionism will win"...Of course, i mention that as long as ideology kept rotting the "debate", chances were slim to convince anyone outside the revisionist's club.
Among others, I gave the example of David Irving who started loosing its credibility by taking part in conferences such as "Warheit macht frei" in germany.
I still don't understand why a Nazi should take the "word nazi" as an insult by the way. Maybe it was the diminutive that shocked, so i rephrased using "National socialist" without success.
Sadly the beautifull site called Adolfthegreat.com does not exist anymore...
Can you provide me with quote from some user who said this?
You seem to have probems with doing things by yourself, do you ?
Just spend some time reading codoh should give you enough examples. But i think Steven Willow is proud enough of his opinion...(It is a hint)
Can you tell me what the alleged political opinions or "who met who" have to do with arguments?
Come on...
Can you show why you did this and what evidence you provided for your claim?a

Thank you in advance.
It is a whole subject...But yes...starting with his article on Anne Frank...
Misusing some quote from martin Broszat, etc.

It is common practice as shown by the Vincent Reynouard video available on codoh as well.
Here http://forum.codoh.info/viewtopic.php?f ... b5eed3be9a

My comment is still available
Bob
Posts: 3404
Joined: 06 Sep 2012, 15:30
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Bob »

Balsamo wrote:Dear Bob,
Funny you mention this comment made by the moderator who of course deleted all the posts that he is referring to...as well as all the answers i gave.
the subject was, "despite the repression, revisionism will win"...Of course, i mention that as long as ideology kept rotting the "debate", chances were slim to convince anyone outside the revisionist's club.
Among others, I gave the example of David Irving who started loosing its credibility by taking part in conferences such as "Warheit macht frei" in germany.
I still don't understand why a Nazi should take the "word nazi" as an insult by the way. Maybe it was the diminutive that shocked, so i rephrased using "National socialist" without success.
Sadly the beautifull site called Adolfthegreat.com does not exist anymore...
Point is that you did not say truth, you said "This without warning" and I proved opposite, thus you lied, correct?
You seem to have probems with doing things by yourself, do you ?
Just spend some time reading codoh should give you enough examples. But i think Steven Willow is proud enough of his opinion...(It is a hint)
You do not understand that you are accuser and you should prove what you said, and If I am not aware of direct location of such a alleged quote, I am not able to locate it of course, you should know it, not me.

I consider your answer as "I can´t" otherwise you would do it. Ok.
Come on...
You can´t, ok.
It is a whole subject...But yes...starting with his article on Anne Frank...
Misusing some quote from martin Broszat, etc.
You did not provide any example to backup your accusation, ok.
It is common practice as shown by the Vincent Reynouard video available on codoh as well.
Here http://forum.codoh.info/viewtopic.php?f ... b5eed3be9a
Leaving aside your need to prove that this is "common practice", can you show example of cheat from this video? I will not quote from your comment to avoid being accused that maybe I picked up what suits me or that I omitted something. Thanks for understanding.
User avatar
Balsamo
Posts: 603
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 16:05
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Balsamo »

This post by the moderator does not warn of imminent ban...It only misinterprets message that does not go in the right direction, breaking his own rules by raising the 6 millions and gas chamber stuff which is not related to the topic...regular codoh mod behaviour...nothing about a permanent ban, i am affraid (they used to be announced and motivated at least)...
so no i did not lie and you seem to have trouble reading...
Bob
Posts: 3404
Joined: 06 Sep 2012, 15:30
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Bob »

Balsamo wrote:This post by the moderator does not warn of imminent ban...It only misinterprets message that does not go in the right direction, breaking his own rules by raising the 6 millions and gas chamber stuff which is not related to the topic...regular codoh mod behaviour...nothing about a permanent ban, i am affraid (they used to be announced and motivated at least)...
so no i did not lie and you seem to have trouble reading...
Not true, here again:

"Your rather constant claim that certain people are 'Nazis", whatever that means these days, is not a very good starting point when trying to refute Revisionst research. And yes, you do that a lot. You use this as a type of personal slander against Revisionists, a way to deflect from their actual investigations. That is not acceptable here"

Again, were you warned or not?
User avatar
Balsamo
Posts: 603
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 16:05
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Balsamo »

what not acceptable on codoh is quite large...Pointing out the double standards in Revisionist's so called scientific methods is unacceptable, as i did dozens of times...The moderation has of course the right to add new subjects on the "not acceptable list" which seems to increase day by day. The normal action in case of non acceptable crimes used to be the delation of posts, the closing of topics, etc. Banning used to be motivated by breaking the rules (depending on who does it, of course).

Anti Jewish rants, racial eugenist theories, praise of high ranking nazis (sorry National socialists), are of course NOT on the list...
What is not acceptable is to say that those rants does not help the holy cause of Revisionism.
It is their problem, i don't care...

Now funny how you handle a discussion...so l'll leave it here...
Bob
Posts: 3404
Joined: 06 Sep 2012, 15:30
Contact:

Re: CODOH now on its own...

Post by Bob »

One simple question and so much text without adressing my simple question.

You were warned that what you write is not acceptable, you accepted guidelines of codoh forum before posting, guidelines states that in case of violation of guidelines you can be banned.

This means you did not say truth when you said "This without warning".
Post Reply