I said that I wanted to see a laboratory report of human cremains. I didn't limit that to some mythical report done 75 years ago. Your charlatans are obviously lying about finding any human cremains buried in mass graves. You, of course, continue to whine about the "qualifications" of those charlatans.
Then we come to the Beatty thesis paper. A bullshit paper by an undergraduate. A parroting of the orthodox claims for the holyhoax complete with the magic jew barbeque. Nothing, zip, zero nada, analyzed for human cremains. Nessie demands that we accept such absolute drivel as gospel truth.
So, we have no shovelfuls of cremains and no defining analysis. Nessie stamps his feet and declares, "You are gullible for not believing everything I say about the holyhoax". Yeah, sure, whatever.
Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
Now you are saying Mattogno is lying when he included the report and accepted its conclusions, in his book on Sobibor
You have no evidence to back that claim up.Your charlatans are obviously lying about finding any human cremains buried in mass graves.
I leave the whining and childish name calling to you.You, of course, continue to whine about the "qualifications" of those charlatans.
You have no qualifications. Any claim of bullshit by you is childish abuse.Then we come to the Beatty thesis paper. A bullshit paper by an undergraduate.
Multiple independent sources who have studied the camp sites agree they contain cremated human remains. You have no evidence to contradict them.A parroting of the orthodox claims for the holyhoax complete with the magic jew barbeque. Nothing, zip, zero nada, analyzed for human cremains. Nessie demands that we accept such absolute drivel as gospel truth.
In your biased and uneducated opinion.So, we have no shovelfuls of cremains and no defining analysis.
Show me the evidence you have. The only way to prove what is at the camps is from evidence from the camps. You claim no cremains at all, so evidence that.Nessie stamps his feet and declares, "You are gullible for not believing everything I say about the holyhoax". Yeah, sure, whatever.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834
Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834
Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
More foot stamping and shrieking from Nessie but no cremains and no laboratory analysis. Same dreary bullshit about gas chambers, graves, exhumations and cremations on the magic Jew barbeque. No photos of any graves, no cremains, no nada. Finito. End of story.
- Huntinger
- Posts: 8947
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
- Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
- Contact:
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
This one is claiming murdered victims, a bystander is requesting confirming information; reply is, you prove it didn't happen.
This is going no where with the normal Nessie banter; another thread ruined.
𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
You hand wave away the evidence I have produced. Time to produce your evidence. Show me the evidence you have to prove no cremated remains at the AR camps.Turnagain wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:06 pmMore foot stamping and shrieking from Nessie but no cremains and no laboratory analysis. Same dreary bullshit about gas chambers, graves, exhumations and cremations on the magic Jew barbeque. No photos of any graves, no cremains, no nada. Finito. End of story.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834
Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834
Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
"You hand wave away the bullshit I have produced". There, FIFY, Nessie.
Quite easily done. Imagine me standing on the porch and pointing to the east. Imagine me saying, "Go look. There ain't any effing cremains".
Quite easily done. Imagine me standing on the porch and pointing to the east. Imagine me saying, "Go look. There ain't any effing cremains".
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
Nessie:
How much cremated remains does Greg Gerdes accept are at the AR camps?Every denier accepts that there are cremated remains at the AR camps.
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
The summary of the Belzec study reports; "The total surface of the mass graves is estimated at 21,000 cubic metres." or 8.4 Olympic sized swimming pools. I have not been through the rest to add up what has been found or remember a specific total. The 1945 Polish study at TII reported and area of 2 hectares and one excavation went down 7m. But that is the total volume of the disturbed ground, not the volume of cremains, which will be less, since the cremains were mixed in with the earth.
Denier claims that not enough has been found to claim mass cremations must have happened, are not based on any actual study. They are just assertions which play down the areas of disturbed ground and cremated remains that have been found.
No more work is going to be done that disturbs the remains. Between grave robbing and past excavations, the ground has been disturbed enough. The only way to satisfy deniers would be to do a massive sieving operation, digging up thousands of tons and separating cremain and earth and then quantifying the amount of cremains. Even if that was done, deniers would find an excuse to dismiss the results as soon as became apparent that there are very large quantities.
Denier claims that not enough has been found to claim mass cremations must have happened, are not based on any actual study. They are just assertions which play down the areas of disturbed ground and cremated remains that have been found.
No more work is going to be done that disturbs the remains. Between grave robbing and past excavations, the ground has been disturbed enough. The only way to satisfy deniers would be to do a massive sieving operation, digging up thousands of tons and separating cremain and earth and then quantifying the amount of cremains. Even if that was done, deniers would find an excuse to dismiss the results as soon as became apparent that there are very large quantities.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834
Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834
Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.
Re: Archaeological & forensic studies of the AR camp sites
No, GPR scans and some core samples would do just fine but kikes have covered all the alleged grave sites with debris and investigatory barriers. In legal terms, this is known as "spoliation" or the hiding or destruction of evidence and is considered an admission of guilt.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 24 guests