Turnagain wrote: ↑
Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:50 pm
Nessie wants me to rehash the drivel claimed for A-B. No thanks. Neither do I wish to rehash Nessie's asinine claims for Treblinka and the other AR camps. I've heard enough of his cockeyed explanations, his shrieks of "misunder/overestimations" and his "evidence" from such such charlatans as Lukaskiewicz, Kola, CS-C et al.
As with the AR camps there's no reasonable explanation for the disposal of that many cadavers or the location of the cremains. There's even a video of some kike clown standing in the water of the "ash pond" and declaring it the mass grave of the cremains of hundreds of thousands of Jews. Nessie wasn't able to come up with one credible Jew eyewitness to the atrocities allegedly committed at Treblinka.
There weren't any steam/gas/vacuum chambers nor magic Jew barbeques at T-II and there weren't any "specially modified" morgues at A-B where Z-B was thrown through windows or poured down holes and the cadavers consumed by magic crematorium with the cremains disappearing into the ether of Jew fantasy.
If you want to come up with a reasonable means of execution, cadaver disposal and the location of the cremains then do so, Nessie. Stamping your feet and shrieking, quoting endless he said/she said bullshit all while claiming that the "evidence" from charlatans and coerced Germans such as Hoess is the gospel truth doesn't get it, Nessie. As you've been told innumerable times before, sell your tired fantasies down the street. Just show us the means and the cremains.
Your methodology is to think up reasons to dismiss the evidence from witnesses, documents and other sources and then claim something else, which you cannot evidence, happened. You demand we dump what is evidenced and believe in what is not evidenced.
You suggested that you have guest lectured at a University using that methodology, but that is utter bullshit. Historians certainly do not use the methodology you use. Neither do criminal investigators, forensic scientists nor archaeologists. No science claims that evidence of existence should be ignored and instead believe in the existence of something that is not evidenced.
You recently said "Yes, eyewitnesses do make mistakes", which gave a glimmer of hope that you were coming to your senses and showing a genuine understanding that you cannot ditch all of the witnesses because of some. The Nazi eyewitness to gassings, Dr Kremer, gave precise details of the numbers gassed in the transports he was present for. The Jewish eyewitness Dr Bendel used estimations. It is hardly surprising that Dr Bendel has not given the same figures as Dr Kremer. That means Bendel made mistakes with the numbers gassed, not that he was lying about gassings.
That the Nazis were able to modify an already secure room into a gas chamber and then cremate bodies in a Krema built for high capacity cremations and then spread the ashes in the nearby field or dump them in the local river, is not an outrageous, nonsensical claim.
What is outrageous and non sensical is the denier suggestion that in 1943-4, c900,000 people were showered and their clothing deloused inside the Kremas II to V and Bunkers I and II at Birkenau, without anyone noticing that happening, then those people were transported back out of the camp to be accommodated somewhere else, without leaving any evidence of that happening.
The denier claim of mass survival is far more impossible to achieve, than the claim made of mass gassings/cremations based on the evidence of multiple eyewitnesses and documents. The tired fantasies are the ones being sold by the deniers.