Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 30674
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Nessie »

Huntinger wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:02 pm
Nessie wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:54 pm
Your inability to get to grips with chronology is staggering.
What has this got to do with the Intelligence Report of 464 camps in Poland; this report was 1941, the one that mentioned a Treblinka III.
The 1944 aerial photo makes it clear it was razed to the ground, leaving only a few buildings to be occupied by the guard. Guards were also left at TII and Belzec.
Image
Sobibor was in existence until October 1943 when this photo was taken.
Image
This is hardly razed to the ground. It never was.
1943 comes before 1944. The camp was in use in 1943, not in 1944. :roll:
You are asking that to deflect from sticking to the topic and answering my questions. Stay on topic and explain why the Nazis razed TII, Sobibor and Belzec to the ground, planted over them, leaving behind buried cremated remains and a guard.
It is clear Sobibor was not razed, the buildings are still there in the photo above, even one in the rear which is where the gaskammer should be. Sobibor is now as it was then a Forester camp except for der Juden building stupid memorials.
The aerial photo from 1944 clearly shows that the vast majority of the camp was razed to the ground, as was TII and Belzec.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 30674
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:08 pm
Why use cartoons to record actual events?

Uh-huh, during the food shortages of WW II, the eeevul Narzis installed a flower farmer at Treblinka.

Right, the Franz photos show the M&H dragline cleaning up behind the mystery machine. All the rest of the hoaxers claim those are photos of the M&H draglines digging graves at T-II.

Did Globocnik give his interview in Buenos Aires or some other South American city?

I answered that question.
Your weasel dodging of why those three camps were left as they were, is becoming increasingly bizarre.

You have no counter to the Nazis were trying to hide their crimes at the camps.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 8991
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Huntinger »

Nessie wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:27 pm

You have no counter to the Nazis were trying to hide their crimes at the camps.
Assumptions with no basis in reality.
Aerial photo of camp 1942-43
Image
Aerial photo of camp 1944.
Image
Compare and contrast.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

Turnagain
Posts: 9530
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
You have no counter to the Nazis were trying to hide their crimes at the camps.
You have no counter to the fact that there wasn't any mass murder at T-II.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 30674
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Nessie »

Huntinger wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:31 pm
Nessie wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:27 pm

You have no counter to the Nazis were trying to hide their crimes at the camps.
Assumptions with no basis in reality.
Aerial photo of camp 1942-43
Image
Aerial photo of camp 1944.
Image
Compare and contrast.
It is the same photo, Wiki has its dates wrong.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 30674
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 7:00 pm
Nessie wrote:
You have no counter to the Nazis were trying to hide their crimes at the camps.
You have no counter to the fact that there wasn't any mass murder at T-II.
Not true. I have countered your claim with a post listing the evidence for the gassings;

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3808&p=151220#p151220

and you have failed to produce evidence that the vast majority of the c850,000 who arrived at TII then left and were accommodated elsewhere. Gassings is evidenced, daily mass transports back out of the camp is not evidenced.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 8991
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Huntinger »

Nessie wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 8:02 pm
It is the same photo, Wiki has its dates wrong.
Soz I found the original and the dates are right.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

Turnagain
Posts: 9530
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
Not true.
Absolutely true. You've produced nothing but spurious bullshit.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 30674
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Thu Dec 10, 2020 9:38 pm
Nessie wrote:
Not true.
Absolutely true. You've produced nothing but spurious bullshit.
Let me see your evidence as to what happened at the AR camps. Show your witnesses, documents, physical evidence.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 9530
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Nazi destruction of evidence - actions of the guilty

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
Let me see your evidence as to what happened at the AR camps.
Been there, done that.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 28 guests