been-there wrote: ↑
Wed Nov 04, 2020 6:19 pm
: An irrational prejudice against all muslims based upon ignorance and fear.
Including the middle eastern women who are begging to close the borders in the west?
Or the moderate, assimilated Muslims who are asking the white west to close the borders because they too know there are too many fundamentalists?
I don't see how it's racist to keep western countries and Europe majority white. THAT'S WHY THOSE MODERATES ARE COMING OVER HERE. So don't we kind of owe it to them?
THEN WHY DID YOU BRING UP RACE AND CALL ME A RACIST IN A DISCUSSION ABOUT A GROUP THAT IS NOT CLASSIFIED AS A RACE???
And... Of course muslims aren’t a race. We’ve been over this. Many times.
Werd wrote: ↑
Wed Nov 04, 2020 12:29 pm
In certain parts of India, Hindus REFUSE to eat pork because eating any animal with emotions [?] is a bad idea
in their religion. While not PROHIBITED, pork is sometimes avoided
. And if you are raised in a family that pressures you to follow the non-pork recommendation, it's almost like it is banned
because of parental or peer pressure. So if you're THAT kind of ex Hindu that was raised around non-pork consumption, then yes, you may enjoy Canada a little more.
You are further showing a quite monumental ignorance.
Nice statement. No proof. And no explanation or definition of what you mean by "ignorance" in this context. No demonstration of what I got wrong. Naturally, been-there is not forthcoming with proof or examples of any kind.
Hindus do not recommend taking the life of an animal for consumption.This makes pure Hindus become vegetarians. Indians are not really strict about this as compared to our Muslim brothers.However, Indians teach that if you eat any animal with emotions, then that may influence and manipulate your destiny. I think it is as simple as that. But, on the other hand, in the Himalayan regions, people consume pork in highly large quantities.The last reason that should be mention is that the deities forbid Hindus to eat pork, or meat in general. Yes, Hindus can eat pork.
Answered August 20, 2018 · Author has 340 answers and 805.3K answer views
Pork is generally not preferred by Hindus. They mostly eat Chicken and Mutton. Other type of meat is not preferred by many Hindus but there is no prohibition of pork for Hindus. Some Hindus do eat pork
but it is not widely available in all Indian states.
In India the quality of pork is not good. Name of Pig is used as a slur in Indian culture. Suar Ke Bacche means son of a pig. It is a slur used to refer people with very dirty minds.
In Indian culture pigs are considered dirty animal and people who go near them or raise them are poor low caste dalit people. They eat pork because they are habituated with it but for general public still there are many people who take disgust to even taking pigs name.
India is a vast country. Based on my experience as Bangladeshi who know many things about India and also observe Indians closely it is correct to say Hindus who eat pork are either low caste dalits or some niche people from urban areas who eat it in some specific restaurants.
India also have huge Muslim population. In order to not offend them many Hindus don’t eat pork.
Hindus only have problem with beef as cow is a motherly goddess believed by Hindus. Many Hindus worship cow. So they don’t eat beef. Muslims eat beef but many times in order to not offending Hindus many Muslims avoid beef consumption in front of Hindus. Even if they eat beef they like to consume it privately. Same with pork consumption for Hindus.
Take that, genius!
Plus I also suspect displaying now a dishonesty: a deceit based on an egocentric need to avoid admitting your ignorance
Ignorance about what? What did I get wrong about what I just said about some Hindus choosing to refrain from pork even though it's not strictly against their religion like pork is forbidden in Judaism or Islam? Been-there just says "wrong" "incorrect" "false" but he never shows his work.
GO AHEAD AND CORRECT ME ALREADY AND SHOW YOUR EVIDENCE OF HOW I TACITLY SUPPORT THOSE TWO THINGS! YOU KEEP SAYING I NEED CORRECTION. SHOW IT. I DARE YOU.
been-there wrote: ↑
Sat Oct 24, 2020 3:08 pm
I think this may be my last reply to you as I see no hope for genuine dialogue where we both come prepared to understand a rival view and open-minded enough to consider we ourselves may need correction.
I don’t see you as capable of that! Werd. Sorry.
I can explain myself and support my accusation that you tacitly support two Zionist agendas but I'm not going to bother.
Face it, you can’t understand simple words and concepts if it means you have to accept your view is mistaken.
Me EARNESTLY ASKING been-there FOR WEEKS to show me where I fucked up and tacitly supported those two Zionist agendas is me NOT WANTING TO BE SHOWN MY MISTAKES OR SHOWN PROOF OF HOW AND IN WHAT WAY I TACITLY SUPPORTED THOSE TWO ZIONIST AGENDAS! In other words, I don't mean to use the words they way I do in English with first preference dictionary definitions and I'm not really asking to be shown evidence and if I was shown it, I would ignore it and refuse to admit it. That's been-there's conspiracy theory.
It's all been-there has. Virtue signaling and NO EVIDENCE OF ANY KIND!
Look, you need explanations for basic words like support, supporting, Islamaphobia, etc., etc.
Notice how been-there is feigning that he doesn't understand that "support" or "supporting" could mean MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF "SUPPORT" such as INTELLECTUAL
, or MORA
L, or PHILOSOPHICAL
, or MONETARY
, etc, and that he knows damn well he needs to be SPECIFIC and then follow those specifics with EXAMPLES such as a LINK OR QUOTE TO SHOW WHERE I FUCKED UP AND TACITLY SUPPORTED TWO ZIONIST AGENDAS. In other words, HE'S THE DISHONST ONE. I even said show me what you mean by support IN THAT CONTEXT SPECIFICALLY! WHAT KIND OF SUPPORT, SPECIFICALLY? So what happens when he is challenged?
I ASK FOR SPECIFICS, AND BEEN-THERE RUNS AWAY AND HIDES IN GENERALITIES AND VAGUE LANGUAGE!