He knows more than you do. Your own incredulity doesn't refute him!
The article is here. Scroll down and read the section "The Blueprints." It's the last section. Also you can read the introduction of the letter from an ITALIAN ARCHITECT who thought of this problem FIRST! So yeah I will take an architect over YOU, Nessie.
And the POSSIBILITY of fitting a less satisfactory door inside the doorway is not proof that it happened so you have no victory. We're both stuck in the middle about the door.Your admission other gas proof doors fit, hands the victory to me. That one type of gas door would not fit does not mean no gassings
If work is being done IN THE SAME MONTH AS GASSING IS CLAIMED, YOU STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED MY QUESTION:viewtopic.php?f=13&t=4238&p=173202&hilit=month#p173202
"If the ventilation work was continuing until October 1941, all that does, is mean the secondary source is one month out. Instead of gassings starting in September, they start in October."
Did they clear out the corpses before they started gassing or were they gassing Jews with corpses still in the room?
That would make scrapbook pages a SECONDARY source, not a primary one. Learn the difference.I do not know where scrapbookpages sourced their information from.
You have not listed the witnesses, nor examined their testimony. You've "cited" without actually showing anything. Saying "these witnesses agree on gassings and holes, and there are holes, therefore gassings are correct" is a non sequitor. I mean you claim you have evidence of Zyklon B residue but you can't link or quote that either. LOL.I have produced corroborating evidence it was used for a number of months as a gas chamber.