Nessie wrote: ↑
Tue Jun 23, 2020 5:06 pm
"The best you could" was to copy and paste Mattogno's arguments from incredulity and ignorance, which are fallacies and not evidence.
Including the documentation that forced you to admit that the morgue was actually used for storing corpses and that the ventilation system that was being discussed as far back as November 1940 for the ventilation room was genuinely about ventilating a genuine corpse room?
Including the witness critiques that showed at a MINIMUM, three detectable liars so far?
Including the original plans of the whole Krema which allowed Bob to make those posts showing how the Poles screwed up their "reconstruction" and revealed that those so called Zyklon B holes aren't evenly distributed on the roof of the morgue?
It is not good enough to claim the witnesses lied, therefore no gassings. You HAVE to provide evidence as to what did happen.
We didn't have to locate every Jew after the war to figure out that one so called witness lied about what happened to those Czech Jews. All we had to do was check the documents of the Central Construction Office (ZBL) of Auschwitz. No wild goose chase necessary.
We can also check the original building plans and the current state of the polish "reconstruction" and see if the Poles made any mistakes in their "reconstruction." No wild goose chase about where all the Jews went is necessary.
We also don't need to go on a wild goose
Jew chase for populations post war when discussing why we should believe your ad hoc that Krema I is the only place where Nazis put alleged gassing holes in unevenly, but did it properly for the other Kremas.
I have never denied that when I make a claim, the burden of proof is on me.
Since you apparently admit that documents about gassing people don't exist, can you still show me ANY trace of Zyklon B in that room in Krema I?
Correct, a gas tight door on its own does not prove homicidal gassings.
So I guess that means every time you point to a gas tight door and declare victory, it's not really a victory.
It is you who points to a gas tight door and declares victory,
I'm showing how an actual gas tight door, of the type that the Nazis were KNOWN FOR ORDERING would not have been properly anchored into the wall. HENCE, why you tried to say one made by the Germans in the camp that wasn't a super dense, heavy, metal, steel door could have still served as a good enough air tight door. I'm declaring victory on the fact that the BEST DOOR FOR THE JOB could not have been used.
Your idea of evidencing what happened inside the Leichenkeller from autumn 1941 to spring 1942 is to call the witnesses to gassings liars.
Three of them, yes. Feel free to quote any others at length and justify their credibility.
No other academic discipline uses that method.
Historians call people of history liars and frauds all the time, silly. What are you even talking about?
Your claim is a ventilation system was built, ventilation is needed for a mortuary, therefore it was a mortuary. That is a non sequitur,
Not pre October 1941, jackass.
It's up to you to prove gassing started then. So did the work that Grabner want done as far back as his complaint in June that ran into September and October 1941 on the ventilation system, was it completed BEFORE or DURING the gassing of Jews? Which means, did they empty the room of corpses before gassing, or were there some gassings with corpses still inside?
YOU NEVER ANSWERED ME THE FIRST TIME I ASKED THAT. YOU DUCKED LIKE A COWARD!
documents are not as infallible as you suggest. Mistakes are made, for example with the Hofle Telegram, where a 5 was missed from the TII total. Plus, if documents always trump witnesses, the Stroop Report proves Jews were murdered at TII.
1. This has NOTHING TO DO with how that one Jew CLEARLY LIED about what happened to those Czech Jews. If you now want to construct a stupid conspiracy theory about how the Central Construction Office of Auschwitz faked those documents to cover up the real homicide, be my guest. Just don't expect to be taken seriously.
2. I can just as easily take your attempt to shit on documents and say that documents with "gas tight" proves nothing. OH WAIT, WE ALREADY SAW THAT NOT EVERY THING IS A CRIMINAL TRACE!