Code: Select all
So, anyway... Trolling and troll-feeding aside... Back on topic.
In the light of what I recently discovered due to the Jewish press's drama-queen over-reaction to a recent painting of the murder of Simon of Trent — and then what Werd has helped me discover regarding the overwhelming evidence pointing to the TRUTH and accuracy of the regular occurrence of human sacrifice of Christian children in Jewish ritualised murders — the following part of the documentary now takes on a different significance.
At 49:21 the following dialogue commenced.
The arrogant, ignorance (or the calculated deceit and DENIAL OF REALITY) displayed by David Baddiel starts to take on added dimensions.Dermot Mulqueen: “I'd open a newspaper and I'd see an article on 'the holocaust', and this victim of 'the holocaust', and this fear about the holocaust”.
David Baddiel: “I don't know which newspaper you were reading”.
Dermot Mulqueen: “So we are constantly fed this narrative about anti-semitism in Europe and whatever. And most of the anti-semitism that Jews have experienced in Europe has either been [because of] usury or satanic child sacrifice of Christians by Jews”.
David Baddiel: “Ok. When is that happening?”
Dermot Mulqueen: “Well its been happening, ...its happened over the centuries”.
David Baddiel: “Do you think Jews are still sacrificing babies?”
Dermot Mulqueen: “I don't know to be honest.
David Baddiel: “Do you think they might?"
Dermot Mulqueen: “I'm not the least attracted... That's something that you'd no more.
David Baddiel: “Well, again I haven't been invited to that particular party”.
Dermot Mulqueen: “Ok.
David Baddiel: “So why did you believe that?”
Dermot Mulqueen: “I saw a very good documentary”.
David Baddiel: “Ok. About killing Christian babies. Ok, I think it's time for a song.
Firstly his comment about not knowing which newspapers regularly feature articles on 'the holocaust' seems dishonest or denial bordering on deeply delusional.
ALL the press in Britain, Europe and America regularly carry 'news' stories on 'the holocaust' presented from emotionally gripping perspectives. It is relentless. I have a whole thread on exactly that bizarre and deliberately disturbing phenomena here.
Secondly, does David Baddiel — someone who self-identifies as Jewish but apparently has little to no interest in Judaism or Jewish history — know anything at all about the wealth of detailed documentary evidence confirming the Jewish ritualised cruel and torturous murder of terrified non-Jewish children over the last eight centuries from Britain, to Germany, to Italy, to Spain, to Greece, etc?
Again, what I NOW see as so blatantly obvious is that Dermot Mulqueen is shown making statements that — although Baddiel ridicules them and attempts to refute them as 'lies' — upon investigation are all revealed to be true and accurate!!
From swimming pools and bakeries at Auschwitz,
to the limitations of cremation muffles,
to disproportionate occurence of holocaust newspaper articles,
to Jewish control of the BBC,
to centuries of Jewish human sacrifice of non-Jewish children....
What do the 'true-believers' here at RODOH focus on? Answer: The false logic in Dermot's response to criticism of his song rhyming 'perks' with 'Mercs'.
1. Newspapers DO regularly have 'news' stories about the holocaust, about victims of the holocaust, about anti-semitism related to the holocaust. That is an easily verifiable, empirical fact.
So David Baddiel was lying, or was in ignorant DENIAL!
2. Jewish ritual murder of non-Jewish children HAS been occurring down the centuries and has been covered up by Jews, right up to the last century. FACT!!!
So yet again David Baddiel was shown to have been practicing a deception, or was in ignorant DENIAL!
I think it is the latter: namely, ignorant denial. He just doesn't know anything about these topics.
So why was he allowed to research and present a BBC documentary dealing with these subjects??
It's hard to avoid the conclusion that it's because he is a popular Jewish comedian, and the Jews who control the BBC thought it would be a good vehicle to perpetuate the deceits regarding this bogus aspect of WW2 history to have a popular, Jewish ignoramus present it to the ignorant population. They can confirm and validate each other's smug, self-satisfied, self-righteous, arrogant, delusional ignorance.
The question which remains in my mind is, a.) is that because they are consciously practicing a deception, or b.) because they are also similarly self-deluded? I think it is the latter.
I suspect that all those people who appeared in the programme, from Jewish professor Deborah Lipstadt to the Muslim Professor Gilbert Achcar of the School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London — are all victims of a collossal mass-delusion.
Just like the story of the Emperor's new clothes.