How can transporting & accommodating 1.274 million leave no evidence?

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
Post Reply
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 28141
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

How can transporting & accommodating 1.274 million leave no evidence?

Post by Nessie »

According to denial, by the end of 1942, some 1,244,166 people (as recorded by the Hofle Telegram and Korherr Report) were transported from the AR camps, fed, clothed and accommodated, without leaving any evidence of that happening.

Deniers love to examine in detail claims that have been made, to establish if that claim was possible or not.

There is no evidence from witnesses (despite there being a pool of 1.24 million witnesses, plus guards and camp workers) to that happening. We have witnesses to far smaller transports of people selected to work and who went from TII to Majdanek and Sobibor to Auschwitz to work. Those transports of a few thousand in total left eye witnesses, but the far larger transports left no eye witnesses.

There is no evidence from documents of mass transports from the AR camps or arrivals at other places from the camps, but there are records of transports to the AR camps and the camps where those 1.24 million could have been sent, kept records.

There is no physical evidence of the construction of enough camps to accommodate that amount of people and the ghettos where they could have been sent were being emptied and closed down, often to the AR camps.

There is no evidence of how the Nazis managed to feed and clothe so many people. There is evidence of property, down to people's underwear leaving the AR camps and being sent for processing and reuse. But there is no corresponding records of the supply of prison uniform for 1.24 million people.

So, how did the Nazis manage to transport, feed, clothe and accommodate 1.24 million people by the end of 1942, without leaving any evidence?
Last edited by Nessie on Mon Feb 03, 2020 5:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.


Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!


Turnagain
Posts: 7287
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie shrieks, "Where did they gooooo?". Nessie apparently forgets that he has...

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 28141
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 8:02 am
Nessie shrieks, "Where did they gooooo?". Nessie apparently forgets that he has...

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
That is a lie. I have evidence for cremains, graves and gassings. You discuss that evidence constantly.

You are clearly dodging explaining how you happily believe what is impossible to have happened.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 7287
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
That is a lie.
Nope. You have...

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 28141
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:11 am
Nessie wrote:
That is a lie.
Nope. You have...

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
Your tactic is to suggest that I really do have no evidence. You suggest that there are no cremains at the camps, no trace of any graves and no evidence of gassings.

You do that to distract from there genuinely being NO evidence for the mass transportation, feeding, clothing and accommodating of `1.24 million people by the end of 1942.

How can such a massive movement of people leave no evidence at all?

The only credible answer is that it did not happen. There was no mass transportation, feeding, clothing and accommodating of those people.

That leaves denial with a massive problem, because it means the last place there is any evidence of those people is inside the AR camps, where all of the evidence is that they were gassed. That explains why there is no evidence of their existence after they arrived at the camps.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by Huntinger »

Turnagain wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 8:02 am
Nessie shrieks, "Where did they gooooo?". Nessie apparently forgets that he has...

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
This is about the tenth thread this poster has made on the exact same topic, just to go round in circles again. Just ignore it.


𝕴𝖈𝖍 𝖇𝖊𝖗𝖊𝖚𝖊 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙𝖘...𝕾𝖔𝖟𝖎𝖆𝖑 𝖌𝖊𝖍𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖗 𝕹𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖑
Alle Trolljuden werden ignoriert Hüntinger

Turnagain
Posts: 7287
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
You do that to distract from there genuinely being NO evidence for the mass transportation...
There is proof of mass transports of deportees out of Treblinka but you ignore that. You have...

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.

User avatar
blake121666
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:26 am
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by blake121666 »

As I've told Nessie countless times, it is 1,274,166 - not 1,244,166.

1.27 million - not 1.24 million.

Just an example of how Nessie never cares to be correct about anything. He has been corrected on this for years but he doesn't care enough to actually STOP using his misread number.

Everyone on the planet knows the Korherr Report and Hoefle Telegrm number to be 1.27 million except for Nessie. The number is 1.24 million to him.

Does Nessie sing the Tommy Tutone "Jenny" tune as 864-5309?

Jenny I've got your number
I need to make you mine
Jenny don't change your number
Eight six four five three oh nine


864-5309! :D


User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 28141
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: How can transporting & accommodating 1.24 million leave no evidence?

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:55 pm
Nessie wrote:
You do that to distract from there genuinely being NO evidence for the mass transportation...
There is proof of mass transports of deportees out of Treblinka but you ignore that. You have...

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
There is proof that a few thousand were selected for smaller transports of workers. That is not daily mass transports. You ignore that it is very odd those few smaller transports are evidenced, but there is no evidence of the far larger daily mass transports. Indeed, the exception proves the rule. If those smaller worker transports left evidence, then the far larger more frequent transports would have to have left evidence. Since they did not, it is logical to conclude, there were no such transports.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 9 guests