Turnagain wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 7:34 am
been-there wrote:Language changes. The current common usage is 'racist'.
By definition a "racist" is prejudiced. A "racialist" isn't. That's why the "language" changed.
Then these are two different words with different meanings.
I was using a particular word to esteem Historical analysis devoid of prejudice based on race, ethnicity or nationality. My observation is that the pseudo-historical, legally protected, flawed narrative that is now called '
THE Holocaust' is ironically a narrative based upon racist hatred and irrational prejudice against Germans who are demonised as ''Nazis'.
And it is a narrative that NOW deviously and dishonestly attempts to discredit seekers of truth by demonising them with hate-tropes and deliberate hate-terms such as
'neo-Nazi' and deliberate misuse of terms like
'anti-semite'.
Turnagain wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 7:34 am
They diminish — and presumably might even eventually disappear — over time within equal, multi-cultural, diverse societies.
Uh-huh, all differences are artificial and would smooth out in "multi-cultural, diverse societies". All living happily under the umbrella of a global government. The only thing I can think is, "Un-effing believable". IIRC, you live in Sweden. The country that decided to turn itself over to the new Caliphate. How "multicultural" of you.
I suggest that your own 'beliefs' are distorting your understanding of my position.
I am against enforced multi-culturalism.
I would prefer the natural perpetuation and preservation of diverse cultural traditions and races to be permitted.
I see the current campaign to enfore 'diversity' and encourage miscegenation as predominantly motivated by malevolent self-interest of groups with a sinister motivation. It is my informed opinion that this campaign is being conducted by people sharing a delusional self-identification that I regard as unempirical and abstract.
If a majority of people want and democratically choose to disown and irreversibly destroy their cultural and national heritage by creating a multicultural society, that is their democratic right.
But if it is unwittingly 'chosen' and forced upon them by an outside, undemocratic group who hypocritically base their motivation on an intrinsically racist, elitist ideology, then that needs to be exposed.