This poster posted the following here about 24 hours later. Even the spelling mistakes are identical. It is profoundly clear this poster is just copying and pasting without considered reflection to advance any knowledge. It is clear this poster has little interest in clarifying history but the opposite, to obfuscate it.Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:48 amYou have provided no GPR or any other evidence to show no (or very little in the way of) ground disturbances.
You have provided no forrensic evidence to show no cremated remains mixed into the ground.
You have provided no witnesses who worked at the camp who say no gassings and what happened instead.
You have provided no documents to show mass transports back out of the camp that arrived anywhere else.
You keep on dodging, so I will keep on reminding you that you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence, over what is evidenced.
You have provided no GPR or any other evidence to show no (or very little in the way of) ground disturbances.
You have provided no forrensic evidence to show no cremated remains mixed into the ground.
You have provided no witnesses who worked at the camp who say no gassings and what happened instead.
You have provided no documents to show mass transports back out of the camp that arrived anywhere else.
You keep on dodging, so I will keep on reminding you that you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence, over what is evidenced.
.It says Less volume in the chamber, the less gas is needed, the lower any pressure change (assuming there is no means to regulate pressure
It is clear this poster has very little technical knowledge and is making uninformed layman assumptions. It is out of its depth.