Most of the nonsense comes from people like the above poster who support the official narrative of the alleged holocaust.
All of this writing is due to his interpretation of the burden of proof, which is why he is demanding the same kind of evidence they have for for supporting this probable hoax.
Lets return to our old Latin Classes and look for guidance.
Maxim semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit..... "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."
In everyday debate, the burden of proof typically lies with the person making the claim, but it can also lie with the person denying a well-established fact or theory.
Revisionists contest that the alleged holocaust never ever had enough proof or evidence to support the Holocaust claim in the first place, but relies on adminicles and eye witness testimony probably supported by the very powerful Allied leaders and Zionists.
To discuss the alleged holocaust there must be a working definition, which according to Dr Nick Terry there is none. However, wiki says:
- Shoah...calamity now associated with the Holocaust.
- 6 million... has occurred so many times that one is unsure which 6 million is referred too. Obviously the last one until the next one comes about as mentioned by Netanyahu when he said Iran wanted to holocaust another 6 million. No doubt they are running short of shekels again.
- systematically murdered...intentionally put in to rule out deaths by disease, congenital conditions and war.
- pogroms...actions of revenge due to the denunciations of Polish people to the Soviets resulting in executions of loved one.
- Policy..There was no policy, this is fiction.
- Occupied Poland... Occupied by the Soviets for 40 years.
People like Nessie insist that the burden of proof lies in those who resist "well known facts"; the fact that they are well known due to intense propaganda efforts, movies, paper clips and legal injunctions is of no concern. The truth of history is not what happened but what the powerful say happened; this human failing is what allowed the churches to hold huge power in the past plunging the world into dark ages.
The reality is all Nessie and hoaxers have are witnesses and adminicles, nothing convincing to show that what they say happened did indeed happen. This failing is why there have been huge adjustments to numbers of murdered. This alone screams that the eye witnesses are wrong and a re examination of the facts are needed, impartial examination which sadly the hoaxers are not capable of.
The "facts" are not clearly established enough to reverse the burden of proof as sucking populations in with propaganda does not constitute information or reality.