Even if you have proved (which you have not) all 5 lied, you have still not proved no gas chambers.Turnagain wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:15 pmNessie wrote:(sigh) Another weasel dodge from Nessie. I didn't prove that "A" witness to gassing lied. I proved that five (5) witnesses to the gas/vacuum chambers lied.You still do not understand that even if you have proved a witness to gassings has lied about seeing gassings with your mathematical calculations (which are just arguments from incredulity and ignorance), that does not mean therefore there were no gassings at TII.
You don't get to add your coulda etc speculations about the gas chambers. You have made false claims about what witnesses have said and so i insist you back up any claim with evidence, which took a lot with Bomba.Right, mathematics is a product of "incredulity and ignorance". Were the gas/vacuum chambers as described by the alleged eyewitnesses an impossibility and no, you don't get to add your coulda' woulda' shoulda' to what they said. Hide and watch, folks, Nessie will attempt to change what the witnesses said. Just as he attempted to change what Bomba said about pumping the air out of the gas chamber.
You now weasel dodge he also said that the chambers were run by pumping gas INTO them.
I am talking about the evidence you are trying to dismiss with your unevidenced allegations.What evidence is that? The unsubstantiated claims of the communist political hack, Lukaszkiewicz? Why didn't the Soviets invite third party observers to witness Lukaszkiewicz's investigation as did the Germans at the Katyn massacre? Why no neutral Swedes or Swiss? Why no allied military personnel? What other evidence? C S-C's tiles and building foundation? Her "discovery" of bones in the T-1 Christian cemetery? Her alleged discovery of the irregularly shaped rabbit holes? What evidence are you talking about?It is not true I rely solely on witness evidence and that I uncritically accept what the witnesses said. I accept that witness evidence is the most flawed form of evidence and I only accept what can be corroborated by other evidence.
Where is your evidence to back up your chant about no cremains etc?
In parts your opinion agrees with the evidence, such as blood is not flammable. In parts the evidence disagrees with your opinion, such as bodies are not flammable.Uh-huh, it's just my "opinion" that blood and human cadavers aren't flammable. It's just my "opinion" that one of Wiernik's 10X25X50 meter graves would produce 14,000 cubic meters of excavated material. It's just my "opinion" that a conventionally constructed brick building won't withstand a vacuum. That's all just my "opinion" but Nessie has "evidence". Right.My method of determining what did and did not happen at TII is evidenced based. Your method is opinion based.
No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
How about you list your evidence as to how many people were killed at TII?