We all read books, we just do not brag like some others we know RtG
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!
Don't you mean 'A Year in Treblinka' ? If so, I suggest you ask Turnagain. It's his favourite book.
Well, at least you got the title right this time. Yes indeed, "A Year in Treblinka" is one of my very favorite books about the holyhoax. It contains an almost endless reserve of physically impossible fantasies. Takes me back to my childhood and reading the tales of Mother Goose, Grimm's fairy tales and Tik-Tok of Oz. Shades of:Don't you mean 'A Year in Treblinka' ? If so, I suggest you ask Turnagain. It's his favourite book.
Hi diddle diddle, the cat and the fiddle and
The cow jumped over the moon.
The little dog laughed to see such sport and
The dish ran away with a spoon.
Such fantasies as Wiernik's and L. Frank Baum's are to be appreciated.
YOU said it DP. I read "A Year in Treblinka".DP wrote:Don't you mean 'A Year in Treblinka' ? If so, I suggest you ask Turnagain. It's his favourite book.
Yep, kable.jirin/Wilman1960 got the boot along with attendant dialogue. Oh well, I tried to tell him to clean up his act. I can now go giggle and gloat, "I told ya' so" down in Siberia.Looks like the admin did some deleting.
"Good Show!!!" Turnagain.
How different it is at the Clowns Forum (SSF). We have StatMech pontificating about books which Jews would like to make mandatory reading in schools, whilst at the same time admitting he has never read Night, one of the most widely read “survivor” memoirs of all time. SM has also mentioned on numerous occasions that he has never actually watched any of Eric Hunt’s documentaries but at the same time he feels qualified to constantly ridicule Mr. Hunt.
However, when it comes to narrow-minded bias and complete ignorance Jeffk 1970 takes some beating. These people are religious fanatics who would drag the world into a new Dark Age. How can the exterminationists engage in reasoned debate with revionists when they do not understand their opponent’s arguments? It therefore comes as little surprise that when they do show up here with sockpuppet accounts, the best they can do when their poorly researched arguments are eviscerated with cold hard science and logic is to insult their opponents and engage in off topic trolling.
To his credit Goody67 admonished Jeffk 1970 for his closed-mindedness in refusing to read read Irving’s work. Jeff’s stumbling reply to this was to claim he was too busy reading books which supported his version of the Hoax to have time for Irving.
Jeffk 1970 again:
https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic. ... ad#p697650
https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic. ... 20#p721767
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 14 guests