I do NOT "claim" that the evidence is imagined. The statements, the testimony of the witnesses are demonstrable lies. What they claim to have witnessed are impossibilities. They are impossibilities under ALL circumstances. That is NOT a flawed argument.You discuss the evidence for gassings, graves and cremains. You then claim that evidence is imagined and therefore no gassings, TII was a transit camp. That is a logically, scientifically and empirically flawed argument.
That Treblinka was a transit camp is a logical possibility. It could have served some other unknown purpose. What is known is that Treblinka did NOT serve as an extermination facility.
No, I discuss whether the testimony given by the witnesses is possible or impossible. Your attempts to obfuscate that isn't going to fly, Nessie. Their testimony is false, therefore the events that they describe didn't happen. You can turn and squirm and weasel dodge forever but nobody was murdered in hermetically sealed gas chambers, buried in giant mass graves, exhumed and cremated on a magic Jew barbeque at Treblinka.You discuss the evidence for gassings, graves and cremains. You then claim that evidence is imagined and therefore no gassings, TII was a transit camp. That is a logically, scientifically and empirically flawed argument.
People could have died in transit to Treblinka, been executed for unknown infractions or died from disease or old age while at Treblinka. That is almost a certainty. Evidence of that should be found. Evidence of ~850,000 people being cremated shouldn't be found and hasn't been found. No proof for the giant mass graves as claimed by the eyewitnesses has ever been found. Evidence that they don't exist is shown by Wiernik's model of the camp.
There is evidence that deportees left the camp for other destinations from at least two (2) sources, the USC film archives and the USHMM. That is evidence, not proof but evidence that Treblinka functioned as a transit camp. Your opinion of that evidence doesn't mean jack squat, Nessie.An attempt was made to equate work selections with it being a transit camp, but that failed.
Your attempt to change the burden of proof to revisionists is laughable. Your claim that nobody would object to revisionists core sampling the Treblinka site or even engaging in a noninvasive investigation is beyond ludicrous.You need evidence to prove your claims and that is simple to find.
No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.