been-there wrote: ↑
Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:47 am
That is the logical fallacy called 'begging the question'. Just repeatedly claiming something occurred does not make it so. Saying the same thing repeatedly does not make it more correct.
Instead think it through for yourself.
Obviously as 65 to 85 million people are estimated to have perished during WW2 and as approximately 63% of them were civilian non-combatants, thus the four million Jews who are alleged to have been killed in Operation Reinhardt would be a relatively small number of that total. That's common sense.
Its not something that we are taught, or constantly reminded of, but do the arithmetic yourself and apply your intellect to it honestly.
Try and think it through by yourself, without succumbing to the programming that we have all been conditioned to apply.
Try and follow what has already been explained to you.
There is no conclusive empirical evidence supporting the Allied and Jewish accusation of a planned and executed genocide of Jews via mass-gassing in extermination camps. An explanation for this lack is that this narrative was an atrocity-propaganda devised to convince the world and the defeated Axis nations that they had been party to a monstrous crime which all decent people should be horrified by and deeply ashamed of. It was a psy-op deceit that justified the Allied nations' own deliberate targeting and mass-murder of civilians for having the 'wrong' ethnicity, and was used to discredit the NSDAP and thus prevent a prolonging or reawakening of the conflict. The hostilities and resentments didn't completely end in May 1945. Conflict continued in Greece and elsewhere.
There was a fear of prolonged guerilla warfare and a resurgence of NSDAP loyalty. To combat the potential for that, German patriots and ex-soldiers were demonised in the public imagination worldwide as 'evil Nazis'. We have ALL been subjected to this indoctrination programme for decades. We continue to be subjected to that mental manipulation. You are still in the grip of that conditioning. Try to recognise that and release yourself from it, by looking at the known facts with a rigorously honest approach.
Read critically what the confessing perpetrators actually admitted to. They "admitted" to physical impossibilities. They were tortured. They made false testimony to protect themselves and their families. Those who denied the allegations were killed or were found 'dead from suicide' in their cells.
Q1. were you aware of this?
Coerced testimony is not reliable. Q2. Do you agree?
Any 'history' that does not permit investigation, critical analysis, or revision of its salient axioms is not a history at all. It is a belief-system.
Any history that sanctifies
its 'survivors' and demonises
the alleged perpetrators in the way that the Jewish 'holocaust' true-believers do, is more of a quasi-religion than a history.
The fact that so many survivor stories contain obvious ridiculous and physically impossible elements yet the mass-media repeat them to us and no-one dares to expose their ridiculousness is a further sign of the quasi-religious status of this ‘history’.
Three graves, some yellow tiles and a wall foundation?!?!
Do you genuinely believe that these archeological findings are “evidence that Treblinka was a death camp”