Turnagain wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 8:05 pmOoh! Das Prussian has truly gotten his panties in a twist. What he's really trying to hide in his clouds of smoke and bullshit is the fact that NO mass graves exist at Treblinka, there were NO exhumations by excavators, the magic Jew barbeque is a total bust and NONE of the witnesses in the USC videos said anything about the odor of burning flesh OR the smell of decomposing bodies. I didn't say that the lack of noxious odors were "proof" that there were no cremations. That lack is just another nail in the coffin of the holyhoax fantasy.
Ignoring the worthless off-topic arguments Turnagain has introduced through desperation at the start of the above passage, I see he has repeated his claim that he "didn't say that the lack of noxious odors were "proof" that there were no cremations. That lack is just another nail in the coffin of the holyhoax fantasy"
I previously asked him to explain what his argument actually was, but not surprisingly he ignored this request. So lets give him another chance :
Question : What exactly is your argument if it is not to prove the absence of cremations of dead bodies ? Especially in light of you making this statement earlier on in the debate : viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3592#p142031
I look forward to your responseThe answer, of course, is that no such cremations took place at Treblinka but I am curious to see what kind of a weasel dodge the hoaxers will attempt to explain why there's no mention of the smell of burning flesh by the witnesses who were transiting Treblinka.
Nope, i just gave you advice about watching all of the video and concentrate on what the witness DID say rather than what they DID NOT say in a few seconds snippet. I asked you if you agreed this approach previously and originally you decided to answer another question you made up in your head, and then you decided to change tactics and ignore my second attempt at asking . So, third time lucky -Turnagain wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 8:05 pmHe claims that we must watch the entire now unavailable USC videos inferring that Hunt edited out the portions of the witnesses mentioning noxious odors. Until you can prove that, DP, Hunt's video stands as valid evidence that the witnesses DID NOT say anything about noxious odors during their stays at Treblinka. The Stangl and Suchomel interviews are another bust yet he natters on about witnesses who DIDN'T observe the cremations. The fact is that the witnesses in the USC interviews are entirely credible while DP's so-called witnesses are dubious at best.
Better luck next time, DP.
Question : Do you agree it is better to watch the entire video rather than just a snippet before you start making any claims about anything ?
As i said twice before, just because they did not mention smells doesn't mean to say there were no smells. You have to know the exact circumstances of each individuals persons 'visit' first. You may even have to prove that they were even in Treblinka in the first place . How you gonna do that from a few seconds interview ? There are already 2 of them witnesses where doubts can be cast over their reliability , imagine what else a bit of digging would find ?
Basically until you can present to us an interview where these Jews were specifically asked if they smelled any odours and they all answered "NO I did not" then i'm afraid you're just pissing in the wind. So...what you got ?
Even if you want to dismiss Stangl and Suchomel, that leaves 9 other witnesses from Treblinka from my list, and there's even more from Sobibor and Belzec. This is relevant as the 3 camps shared the same objectives and set-up. Now compare that to your worthless speculation and scraps you've picked out the bins ! The games over , son. It's a complete annihiliation.