Auschwitz

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
Turnagain
Posts: 5957
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Turnagain » Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:18 pm

Bunim Abend is desperately trying to reverse the burden of proof. He is apparently assuming that the holyhoax is a proven fact. It isn't. We are supposed to take the unsupported word of fakirs and liars as gospel truth. Wherever did you come up with that harebrained notion, Abend? Where did you get the equally harebrained claim that the belief of thousands proved anything? People used to believe in witchcraft and the Sun revolved around the earth. Disease was caused by "bad" air and phlogiston was a substance released by combustion. Ever heard of a book titled, "Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowds", by Charles Mackay?

Your claim that "everybody believes it so it must be true" claim is a bust, Abend. That we must believe in the holyhoax because all of the cool kids believe it is pure, unadulterated bullshit.

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Huntinger » Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:44 pm

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:18 pm
Bunim Abend is desperately trying to reverse the burden of proof. He is apparently assuming that the holyhoax is a proven fact. It isn't. We are supposed to take the unsupported word of fakirs and liars as gospel truth. Wherever did you come up with that harebrained notion, Abend? Where did you get the equally harebrained claim that the belief of thousands proved anything? People used to believe in witchcraft and the Sun revolved around the earth. Disease was caused by "bad" air and phlogiston was a substance released by combustion. Ever heard of a book titled, "Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowds", by Charles Mackay?

Your claim that "everybody believes it so it must be true" claim is a bust, Abend. That we must believe in the holyhoax because all of the cool kids believe it is pure, unadulterated bullshit.

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
It obviously has been inculcated to this belief system of the hoax. I suspect it is not after discourse but just another hoaxer trying to peddle their wares with exactly the same methods as Goody, Nessie, Das Prussian, AfG and the Bobbsey twins all use. This one like the bellie danca who hits its thigh with rhubarb leaves while dancing the mamba has an interest in the Slavs with a similar preoccupation with books and of course Hitler said this, Goebbels said that with another tonne of anecdotes which are suggestive. It cannot realize that once those anecdotes are put to the test they vaporize.
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖊 𝕾𝖙𝖆𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎 𝖋𝖚̈𝖗 𝖉𝖊𝖓 𝕾𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖗𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖙𝖘𝖉𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖘𝖙

Bunim Abend
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Bunim Abend » Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:00 pm

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:18 pm
Bunim Abend is desperately trying to reverse the burden of proof. He is apparently assuming that the holyhoax is a proven fact. It isn't. We are supposed to take the unsupported word of fakirs and liars as gospel truth. Wherever did you come up with that harebrained notion, Abend? Where did you get the equally harebrained claim that the belief of thousands proved anything? People used to believe in witchcraft and the Sun revolved around the earth. Disease was caused by "bad" air and phlogiston was a substance released by combustion. Ever heard of a book titled, "Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowds", by Charles Mackay?

Your claim that "everybody believes it so it must be true" claim is a bust, Abend. That we must believe in the holyhoax because all of the cool kids believe it is pure, unadulterated bullshit.

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
I'm not trying to reverse the burden of proof. It is the deniers who are simply refusing to provide any evidence for their unfounded claims and at the same time ignoring the evidence which refutes their unfounded claims.

1. The Holocaust as defined as the Nazis attempt to exterminate European Jews between 1941-1945 is a proven fact. If you dispute the fact, present your evidence.

2. I've never said "everybody believes it so it must be true", don't quote me as saying something I have never posted.

Why do you always end your posts with "No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story." and then when asked to provide proof for the first two claims you refuse to provide any evidence and instead just repeat the same sentence?

You also keep posting "no holyhoax" - what do you mean by that statement?

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Huntinger » Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:04 pm

Bunim Abend wrote:
Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:00 pm
1. The Holocaust as defined as the Nazis attempt to exterminate European Jews between 1941-1945 is a proven fact. If you dispute the fact, present your evidence.
A proven fact would have absolute irrefutable evidence. Here is your chance to present this evidence, not just merely state it exists.
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖊 𝕾𝖙𝖆𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎 𝖋𝖚̈𝖗 𝖉𝖊𝖓 𝕾𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖗𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖙𝖘𝖉𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖘𝖙

Turnagain
Posts: 5957
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Turnagain » Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:07 am

Bunim Abend wrote:
I'm not trying to reverse the burden of proof. It is the deniers who are simply refusing to provide any evidence for their unfounded claims and at the same time ignoring the evidence which refutes their unfounded claims.

1. The Holocaust as defined as the Nazis attempt to exterminate European Jews between 1941-1945 is a proven fact. If you dispute the fact, present your evidence.

2. I've never said "everybody believes it so it must be true", don't quote me as saying something I have never posted.

Why do you always end your posts with "No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story." and then when asked to provide proof for the first two claims you refuse to provide any evidence and instead just repeat the same sentence?
What utter bullshit. Revisionists have produced evidence in abundance of the holyhoax being a fraud. I have stated multiple times that the hermetically sealed gas chamber was a violation of Boyle's law and impossible. Al Neumaier showed proof of that and I duplicated his work. I demonstrated that it was impossible for the M&H Mb clamshell equipped dragline to both excavate and stockpile the ex from the alleged mass graves. The same for that piece of equipment to exhume the bodies as described by eyewitnesses. The magic Jew barbeque is another impossibility. Cremations take fuel. Yet here you are, claiming that revisionists have presented no evidence of their claims.

The holocaust is defined as a hoax. The National Socialists persecuted the Jews and wanted them out of Europe but there was no plan to exterminate them. If that's the case, show a signed order from Hitler or any ranking National Socialist to commence murdering Jews. Even Stalin gave Lazar Kaganovich a signed order to murder the Kulaks in the Ukraine. Dr. Faurisson savaged Hilberg over his claim of exterminating the Jews was a matter of consensus. "Mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy".

So, you're not saying that revisionists should believe the holyhoax tales because millions of other people believe in the fable. Glad that you finally admitted that.

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.

Bunim Abend
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Bunim Abend » Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:05 am

Turnagain wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:07 am
What utter bullshit. Revisionists have produced evidence in abundance of the holyhoax being a fraud. I have stated multiple times that the hermetically sealed gas chamber was a violation of Boyle's law and impossible. Al Neumaier showed proof of that and I duplicated his work. I demonstrated that it was impossible for the M&H Mb clamshell equipped dragline to both excavate and stockpile the ex from the alleged mass graves. The same for that piece of equipment to exhume the bodies as described by eyewitnesses. The magic Jew barbeque is another impossibility. Cremations take fuel. Yet here you are, claiming that revisionists have presented no evidence of their claims.
"Revisionists" have produced no evidence that the Holocaust is a "fraud" or a "hoax". Instead, they rely on using fallacies and lies to back up their claims.

Neumaier proved nothing.

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... -rest.html

Image

From the Kurt Franz Album.
By using excavators to uneartth the corpses of the victims, employing Jewish prisoners in large numbers, and operating simply built, huge, open-space crematoria, which were activated in the shortest possible time, the Operation Reinhard staff was able to complete its mission of cremation and the erasure of their despicable crimes.
From Yitzhak Arad's "Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka: The Operation Reinhard Death Camps".

You don't have any idea what you're attempting to refute, do you?

What on earth is the "magic Jew barbeque" that you regard as an impossibility?

Fuel was used, what are you on about now? :lol:

You haven't produced any evidence that no cremains and no graves have been found at Treblinka. Instead, you just repeat "No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story." at the end of your posts. Embarrassing really. :lol:
The holocaust is defined as a hoax. The National Socialists persecuted the Jews and wanted them out of Europe but there was no plan to exterminate them. If that's the case, show a signed order from Hitler or any ranking National Socialist to commence murdering Jews. Even Stalin gave Lazar Kaganovich a signed order to murder the Kulaks in the Ukraine. Dr. Faurisson savaged Hilberg over his claim of exterminating the Jews was a matter of consensus. "Mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy".

So, you're not saying that revisionists should believe the holyhoax tales because millions of other people believe in the fable. Glad that you finally admitted that.

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.
The Holocaust is defined as a "hoax" by antisemitic (and often neo-Nazi) twats. Ignorant fools who have neither read a single book on the Holocaust nor watched a documentary about the Holocaust. What kind of imbecile would deny a historical event which is one of the most (if not the most) documented events in modern history?

Hitler was clever enough to not sign a written order to exterminate the Jews after the outrage of the T4 Aktion programme which he publicly stopped, although it continued secretly. However, his speeches and quotes from the Goebbels Diaries demonstrate without any doubt that he knew what was happening and approved of it. An absence of a written order is not proof that Hitler did not know what was happening; on the contrary, he was kept well up to date about the killing of the Jews.

You think because Stalin gave an order for something then Hitler must have given an order for something? Thanks for exposing the stupidity of a denier.

Hitler said in January 1939 in his infamous "Prophecy speech":
Today I want to be a prophet once more: if international Jewry succeeds in plunging the nations into another world war, the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe!
A few years later, he repeated the "Prophecy":
... [T]he war will not end as the Jews imagine it will, namely with the uprooting of the Aryans, but the result of this war will be the complete annihilation of the Jews. Now for the first time they will not bleed other people to death, but for the first time the old Jewish law of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, will be applied. And – world Jewry may as well know this – the further these battles [of the war] spread, the more anti-Semitism will spread. It will find nourishment in every prison camp and in every family when it discovers the ultimate reason for the sacrifices it has to make. And the hour will come when the most evil universal enemy of all time will be finished, as least for a thousand years.
In his political testament during the final days of the war, he stated:
I have also made it quite plain that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by these international conspirators in money and finance, then that race, Jewry, which is the real criminal of this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I further left no one in doubt that this time not only would millions of children of Europe's Aryan peoples die of hunger, not only would millions of grown men suffer death, and not only hundreds of thousands of women and children be burnt and bombed to death in the towns, without the real criminal having to atone for this guilt, even if by more humane means.
Goebbels in 1943 said:
None of the Führer's prophetic words has come so inevitably true as his prediction that if Jewry succeeded in provoking a second world war, the result would be not the destruction of the Aryan race, but rather the wiping out of the Jewish race. This process is of vast importance, and will have unforeseeable consequences that will require time. But it can no longer be halted. It must only be guided in the right direction.
In November 1941, he published an article titled, "The Jews are to blame" which returned to Hitler's prophecy of 1939 and stated that world Jewry was suffering a "gradual process of extermination".

Goebbels also privately wrote:
February 14, 1942: The Führer once again expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.

March 27, 1942: A judgment is being visited upon the Jews that, while barbaric, is fully deserved by them. The prophecy which the Führer made about them for having brought on a new world war is beginning to come true in a most terrible manner. One must not be sentimental in these matters. If we did not fight the Jews, they would destroy us. It's a life-and-death struggle between the Aryan race and the Jewish bacillus.
Goebbels' diaries mention plenty examples of Jews being "liquidated" and that the rest of the world should follow Germany's example of killing the Jews.

Rosenberg said during the war:
Some six million Jews still live in the East, and this question can only be solved by a biological extermination of the whole of Jewry in Europe. The Jewish Question will only be solved for Germany when the last Jew has left German territory, and for Europe when not a single Jew stands on the European continent as far as the Urals... And to this end it is necessary to force them beyond the Urals or otherwise bring about their eradication.
During the war, Hitler was shown "Report to the Führer on Combating Partisans", stating that 363,211 Jews had been killed by Einsatzgruppen in August–November 1942. The report was marked as "Shown to the Führer". Similarly, Gestapo Chief Heinrich Müller sent a telegram on August 2, 1941, ordering that "especially interesting illustrative" material should be sent to Berlin because, "the Führer should be presented with continuous reports on the work of Einsatzgruppen in the East from here".

The reason you're claiming that the only proof would be a written order is because you know that one does not exist (ignoring also the fact that if one did exist it would have been one of the first things the Nazis would have destroyed!) and you are deliberately ignoring all of the other evidence, including Hitler's own words. Nice try, but you have failed and instead demonstrated what a denier only considers to be proof. :shock:

I'm saying that Holocaust deniers should actually study the evidence, something they aren't fond of doing, clearly.

Do you have "No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story." ready to paste every single post? :lol:

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Huntinger » Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:32 am

Bunim Abend wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:05 am
The reason you're claiming that the only proof would be a written order is because you know that one does not exist (ignoring also the fact that if one did exist it would have been one of the first things the Nazis would have destroyed!) and you are deliberately ignoring all of the other evidence, including Hitler's own words. Nice try, but you have failed and instead demonstrated what a denier only considers to be proof. :shock:

I'm saying that Holocaust deniers should actually study the evidence, something they aren't fond of doing, clearly.

Do you have "No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story." ready to paste every single post? :lol:
It says it is not the fat tart hitting its wobbling fat thighs with rhubarb leaves but it is taking on where the bellie danca left. Fair enough who cares. National Socialist Deutschland had no such policy and even if they did they expected to win the conflict. Whatever, they did would have been within their law and legal. Perhaps this poster just thinks laws are made by Mr Trump or Ms May or perhaps on stone tablet given by Yahweh. If such a secret project existed no Ukrainian blabbermouth guards would be used but highly trained SD men who knew the Kreislauf system of insect and vermin control. This is the equivalent of a highly sensitive CIA operation in say Syria using Jude. Of course with Jude they can be bought but Ukrainians are different. All of us have studied the evidence hoping some Messiah like you Jude would come along and relieve us all from our burden of suffering. Of course there are some neo Nazis and right wingers, even anti semites. Glad I am not one of them.
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖊 𝕾𝖙𝖆𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎 𝖋𝖚̈𝖗 𝖉𝖊𝖓 𝕾𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖗𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖙𝖘𝖉𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖘𝖙

Turnagain
Posts: 5957
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Turnagain » Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:39 am

Bunim Abend wrote:
Neumaier proved nothing. http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... -rest.html
Right, the eyewitnesses agreed that the original gas chamber was HERMETICALLY SEALED. Roberto's argument seems to be that there was an opening for discharging the CO after the gassing. That has nothing to do with the HERMETIC SEALING of the gas chamber prior to introducing the engine exhaust. Then we have conflicting claims of the air being evacuated from the gas chamber. No mention of Boyle's law and the impossibility of such claptrap. Don't forget that up to 1,500 people were forced into three 25 square meter chambers. Well, according to Wiernik, that is.

Bunim Abend wrote:
Fuel was used, what are you on about now? :lol:
Uh-huh, Rajchman described the fuel as twigs the size of toothpicks and another time as being "brush with gasoline thrown on it". Another description was of sufficient wood to build some small campfires that were lit with a match. Care to explain what fuel was used and where it came from? Cremations in India require 300-450 kg of wood per body so Sergeant Floss's magic Jew barbeque was invented to dodge the absence of any evidence of logging or shipments of wood/coal/whatever to Treblinka.

Here is a video of a clamshell equipped dragline demolishing a building.



Note how easily the clamshell cuts through masonry and rips apart beams and rebar. Now let's drop that clamshell into a pit full of decomposing bodies and see what we get. You for damned sure aren't going to get complete, whole bodies that can be neatly laid, fat women first, on the magic Jew barbeque grill. You really don't have a clue about how equipment such as a dragline actually operates, do you. Embarrassing, actually.

So far, you're zero for two.

Then we come to Abend's long and tedious he said/she said tirade. Too bad, Abend, but you can turn and squirm from now til forever but you still haven't explained the workings of the hermetically sealed gas chamber. You can begin by explaining how Boyle's law took a vacation in Eastern Poland during the mid 1940s. After you have done that, you can explain how that M&H Mb dragline both excavated the 10X25X50 meter graves and stockpiled the ex from them. Then you can explain where the eeevul Narzis put the ex since there was about 1.7 km of it. We've already been over the impossibilities of the exhumations and the magic Jew barbeque. The fact is that you innumerate fools have no inkling of even the most basic physics and are totally clueless about the workings and capabilities of a Tonka toy let alone real world machinery.

Here is an example. A dragline equipped with a clamshell bucket and ~35 foot boom can build, by calculation, a stockpile ~5 meters high. If you look at the ARC photos you will see that the stockpiles are about four feet above the cab of the dragline. Per mfg. specs, the cab of the M&H Mb was 12 feet confirming that the maximum height of a stockpile built by that machine was ~5 meters. Are you clear on that? Since the angle of repose for wet (damp) sand is 45 degrees then each meter of stockpile will contain 25 cubic meters of excavated soil. The gain (or fluff) for sand is 12% so add that to the amount of soil excavated. Can any of you clowns understand that the claims made for Treblinka are completely bogus regardless of what Hitler or Goebbles said in a speech? Are you really that thick? Apparently so.

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story. (Nah, I don't copy and paste it. I just write it out.)

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by Huntinger » Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:12 am

Turny this thread is about Auschwitz Birkenau, not Treblinka. It is about Zb not alleged diesel engines. There were no excavators at Birikenau ( I don't think atm anyhows). Seems the fat Bellie Danca hitting its buttocks with the rhubarb leaves is trying to make you dance the mambo with her. Good post but more appropriate elsewhere. Cheers. I think you have sussed this one out, it is obviously a clone.
Beware the maids who slap their buttock with rhubarb leaves. Linden leaves are perfectly OK.. :D
𝕲𝖊𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖊 𝕾𝖙𝖆𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖕𝖔𝖑𝖎𝖟𝖊𝖎 𝖋𝖚̈𝖗 𝖉𝖊𝖓 𝕾𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖗𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖙𝖘𝖉𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖘𝖙

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8516
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: Auschwitz

Post by been-there » Wed Jun 05, 2019 7:11 am

Bunim Abend wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:05 am
"Revisionists" have produced no evidence that the Holocaust is a "fraud" or a "hoax".
Really?! :lol:

Image
Bunim Abend wrote:
Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:05 am
Instead, they rely on using fallacies and lies to back up their claims.

You don't have any idea what you're attempting to refute, do you?

The Holocaust is defined as a "hoax" by antisemitic (and often neo-Nazi) twats. Ignorant fools who have neither read a single book on the Holocaust nor watched a documentary about the Holocaust. What kind of imbecile would deny a historical event which is one of the most (if not the most) documented events in modern history?

Hitler was clever enough to not sign a written order to exterminate the Jews after the outrage of the T4 Aktion programme which he publicly stopped, although it continued secretly. However, his speeches and quotes from the Goebbels Diaries demonstrate without any doubt that he knew what was happening and approved of it. An absence of a written order is not proof that Hitler did not know what was happening; on the contrary, he was kept well up to date about the killing of the Jews.

You think because Stalin gave an order for something then Hitler must have given an order for something? Thanks for exposing the stupidity of a denier.

Hitler said in January 1939 in his infamous "Prophecy speech":
Today I want to be a prophet once more: if international Jewry succeeds in plunging the nations into another world war, the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe!
A few years later, he repeated the "Prophecy":
... [T]he war will not end as the Jews imagine it will, namely with the uprooting of the Aryans, but the result of this war will be the complete annihilation of the Jews. Now for the first time they will not bleed other people to death, but for the first time the old Jewish law of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, will be applied. And – world Jewry may as well know this – the further these battles [of the war] spread, the more anti-Semitism will spread. It will find nourishment in every prison camp and in every family when it discovers the ultimate reason for the sacrifices it has to make. And the hour will come when the most evil universal enemy of all time will be finished, as least for a thousand years.
In his political testament during the final days of the war, he stated:
I have also made it quite plain that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by these international conspirators in money and finance, then that race, Jewry, which is the real criminal of this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I further left no one in doubt that this time not only would millions of children of Europe's Aryan peoples die of hunger, not only would millions of grown men suffer death, and not only hundreds of thousands of women and children be burnt and bombed to death in the towns, without the real criminal having to atone for this guilt, even if by more humane means.
...you are deliberately ignoring all of the other evidence, including Hitler's own words. Nice try, but you have failed and instead demonstrated what a denier only considers to be proof. :shock:

I'm saying that Holocaust deniers [history revisionists] should actually study the evidence, something they aren't fond of doing, clearly.
I have spent years looking into the actual evidence. Initially I was actively looking for evidence to support it as I was shocked to discover that even the famous and respected 'holocaust' survivor eye-witnesses had lied. I wanted to confirm that it had actually occurred as claimed.

And what I discovered is the reality that ALL the top brass of the Third Reich denied any knowledge of a mass-gassing extermination policy. I have looked into this in some detail to see if I could find anyone in the upper echelons of the Supreme command and found no-one. They ALL denied any knowledge of it.

Not only that but the Jewish Pyschologist Capt. Gilbert — who was a fluent German speaking Jew from America — admitted that all the top staff at Nuremburg except Goebbels were in emotional shock when they heard the (unbeknownst to them) coerced testimony of Auschwitz Commandant Rudolf Höß.

Herman Göring wasn't shocked, because he correctly recognised that Höß's testimony was physically impossible. Something that is now accepted as correct even by the defenders of the Holocaust narrative. Göring had a very high IQ according to the tests by Jewish psychologists of the Nuremburg captives. So he correctly saw through the emotional misinformation and false testimony.

Hitler, Himmler, Frank, Kaltenbrunner, Göring, Ribbentropp and all the others all denied any knowledge of the mass-gassing allegations and initially regarded them as atrocity propaganda. Few people today know this because this information is deliberately witheld.

Here is part of Himmler's testimony to the Swedish Jew Norbert Masur in April 1945:
Masur wrote:
In order to stop the epidemic, we were forced to cremate the bodies of the many people that died of the disease. That was the reason we had to build the crematoria, and now, because of this everybody wants to tighten the noose around our neck.

"The war in the East was unbelievably difficult. We did not want any wars with Russia. But suddenly we learned that the Russians had 20,000 tanks and that forced us into action. Either we prevailed or we would perish.
The war at the eastern front made the most difficult demands on our soldiers. A terrible climate, never ending distances, an enemy population, and constantly appearing partisans. Only by being harsh could the troops prevail. Because of this, they were forced to destroy whole villages, if there was resistance and shooting from such a village.
The Russians are not ordinary enemies, we cannot understand their mentality. In the most hopeless situations, they would refuse to capitulate. If, because of these difficulties in the east, the Jewish people suffered great casualties, one needs to remember that the German people also suffered severely.

"The bad reputation of these camps was because of the unfortunate choice of names for them. That was a mistake, we should have called them ‘educational camps’. There were not only Jewish and political prisoners in the camps, but also criminal elements, who were detained after they served their sentence in prison. Because of this, in 1941, a war year, Germany had the lowest crime rate in decades. The prisoners had to perform heavy labour but that was true of the German people too. The treatment in the camps was severe but just."
MASUR: But one cannot deny that many atrocities occurred in the camps.
"I have to admit that this happened, but I then punished the guilty." [N.B. via investigator judged such as Konrad Morgen]
MASUR: Tell us the number of Jews still alive in the camps.
Theresienstadt 25,000,
Ravensbrück 20,000
Mauthausen 20 to 30,000, in addition to smaller numbers in several other camps.
In the camps captured by the Allies the following numbers of Jews were left:
Auschwitz 150,000,
Bergen Belsen 50,000,
Buchenwald 6,000.
In Hungary we left 450,000 Jews.
"So what were the thanks for this? The Jews shot at our troops in Budapest."
MASUR: "If there were 450,000 Jews left of the original 850,000 it means that 400,000 Jews were deported to an unknown destiny. The Jews left in Hungary could not know what fate the Germans had in mind for them, and that was the reasons for this kind of reaction."
Himmler pushed such arguments aside quoting the well-known verse of LaFontaine,"This animal is very bad, when attacked it defends itself".
"It was my intention to turn over the concentration camps without defending them, as I had promised. I turned over Bergen Belsen and Buchenwald, but I got no thanks for this. In Bergen Belsen they tied up a guard and photographed him with a few prisoners who had just died. And such pictures are now being published all over the world press.

I also turned over Buchenwald without a struggle. Suddenly the advancing American tanks opened fire, hit the hospital building which consisted of a wooden barrack, and which of course caught on fire, burned down completely and the burned corpses were later photographed. With these kind of pictures the world press is now printing hate propaganda.

When I released 2,700 Jews into Switzerland this also resulted in a press campaign again me personally. It was written that I only released these people in order to establish an alibi for myself. I do not need an alibi as I only did what I thought was necessary for my people, and I will stand on that. I did not become a rich man.

Nobody has been covered with dirt in the newspapers in the last 12 years as much as I have been. It never made any difference to me, even in Germany anybody could write about me whatever they wanted. But the publication of atrocities as incitement against myself does not encourage me to continue my policy to turn over the camps without resistance. That is why, a few days ago, when the American tank columns closed in on a camp in Saxony, I had this camp evacuated. Why should I do anything differently?"

Theresienstadt is not a camp per se but is a town inhabited only by Jews, is completely government by Jews and all the necessary labour is performed by Jews.
“This is the kind of camp created by myself and my friend Heydrich and we hoped to make all camps this way.”
My meeting with Heinrich Himmler
by Norbert Masur
This actually demonstrates another fraudulent aspect of the 'holocaust' as reliable history. Viz. that books and documentaries lie by omission: they omit awkward facts, such as this conversation with Himmler.
And they lie by commision: they falsely promulgate the belief that 'the Nazis' admitted the mass-gassing claim. That is a clear lie and deception.

~~~~~~~~~~

Adolf Hitler also denied any knowledge of mass-gassings, denied ordering it, and denied that it occurred. Just as his deputy Herman Göring did at the Nuremberg trials. And just as Heinrich Himmler denied it to Norbert Masur on April 20th 1945 and as Himmler had previously denied it to officers at Krakow in February 1944.

Image

Here is the court testimony of Hans Frank regarding the alleged 'extermination camp' genocide, and how Hitler had told him personally when specifically asked, that the rumours of a systematic extermination of the Jews were "false":
HANS FRANK: On 7th February 1944 I succeeded in being received by Adolf Hitler personally — I might add that throughout the war he received me three times only. In the presence of Bormann I put the question to him:
“My Führer, rumours about the extermination of the Jews will not be silenced. They are heard everywhere. No one is allowed in anywhere. Once I paid a surprise visit to Auschwitz in order to see the camp, but I was told that there was an epidemic in the camp and my car was diverted before I got there. Tell me, my Führer, is there anything in it?”

The Führer said:
"You can very well imagine that there are executions going on — of insurgents. Apart from that I do not know anything. Why don't you speak to Heinrich Himmler about it?"

And I said:
"Well, Himmler made a speech to us in Krakow and declared in front of all the people whom I had officially called to the meeting that these rumours about the systematic extermination of the Jews were false; the Jews were merely being brought to the East."

Thereupon the Führer said: “Then you must believe that”.

-- Hans Frank. Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 12. 18th April 1946
Image
Hans Frank at the Nuremberg show-trials in 1945

~~~~~~~~~~

Adolf Hitler also denied it to Otto Dietrich
Otto Dietrich wrote:"Toward the end of 1944 the first allegations about the crimes in Poland began appearing in the foreign press... I handed these reports to him [Hitler] and took the occasion to ask him TWICE... Each time he replied indignantly that the reports were typical "propaganda lies and distortions of the enemy, intended to cover up their own crimes at Katyn Forest".

-- Otto Dietrich. 'The Hitler I knew: Memoirs of the Third Reich's Press Chief'. Pg 130.
Image
Book cover showing, Joe Goebbels, Otto Dietrich and Adolf Hitler.

Anyone who genuinely looks at the actual evidence fairly and honestly will discover that the claims and the supposed evidence for them are laughable.

Image
Image
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests