Best Revisionist Arguments for a Newcomer to Revisionism

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).

Moderators: Budu Svanidze, Joe Future

Post Reply
User avatar
Friedrich Paul Berg
Posts: 2657
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:21 am

Best Revisionist Arguments for a Newcomer to Revisionism

Post by Friedrich Paul Berg » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:09 pm

The above thread links to CODOH. The arguments one can see there are lame and pathetic. At RODOH we can do much better.

1. How do hoaxers explain the autopsies?

2. How do hoaxers defend the claim that diesel engines were the source of the deadly carbon monoxide that supposedly murdered nearly two million Jews in the AR camps?

3. How do hoaxers explain the fact that ONLY one "eyewitness" claimed to have seen REDDISH coloring on any corpse from cyanide or CO?

4. Why did the Germans supposedly use what at best would have been a "makeshift" gassing technology when they had perfectly excellent gas chambers for fumigating entire railroad trains?



Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Nessie and 11 guests